I am a Go enthusiast and have a Go board and a chess box at home. Yesterday, I shook one of the chess boxes in the moment of boredom. As a result, only one piece fell. What are the reasons for the lottery you said, and I want to ask if the chess pieces fall out for the same reason? Mizukawa said, and everyone was listening carefully. It's just that Dueñas immediately stood up and said, isn't it the same as signing? Mizukawa said, the sign is because the length is very long, do you think the chess pieces are also very long? Any one of them can be a drop draw, and the piece can only be the top one. After he finished speaking, he immediately stopped refutating, and Mizukawa was also waiting for others to explain. After the scene was quiet for ten minutes, Liuzi Fenglai volunteered and said: This has something to do with the way it is placed. The pieces are placed horizontally, while the sticks are placed vertically. There is a transfer of force in both horizontal and vertical placements, however there is a direction in horizontal placement.

The six sons of the wind are coming, no. When you put the glass beads in the coverless quilt and slowly drip them, what do you think will happen to the glass beads? Won't fall out. Why is the shape of the glass beads so good at dissipating the forces of the outside world, so that none of the glass beads can fall out.

In Dueñas, glass beads are spheres. There is only one way to place it, and there is no difference between flat and vertical placement. That being the case, there is no such thing as a pawn. Of course, the shape also has a certain effect on the object.

You're wrong, not in the way they are placed, but in the way they are placed according to the principle of lowest energy. Due to the special shape of the piece, it can only be placed flat in the box. Similarly, the sign will lie flat when there are no spatial constraints. Since the longest line of the lottery barrel is smaller than the longest line of the lot, the lot can only be placed vertically. Let's talk about Mizukawa rice. Actually, there is a movable space involved here. Chess pieces and sticks are placed differently, but most of them have little room to move. In this way, they are unable to dissolve the forces of the outside world on their own. Thus, a chain of force transmission is formed. The transfer chain of force, like dominoes, requires the last object to withstand the force from the transfer chain, causing the object to come out of the container.

Movable space? Fill a bucket with a couple of prickly chestnuts and do you think one of them can fall out? The answer is no. So, movable space is not a completely correct explanation. I think the chestnuts must be stacked at more than half the height of the barrel, but not more than nine-tenths of the barrel.

In Dueñas, concave and convex toothing occurs between spiny chestnuts. The chestnut will not fall out after the tooth is occluded. This is a special case and is not discussed. Newtonian classical mechanics is only suitable for macroscopic matter, but microscopic matter requires quantum mechanics. But, can you say that Newton's classical mechanics was wrong?

You say the quantity must be large, so I'll put a few milk cartons in the bucket. Do you think it's going to come out? I'm telling you do, but with a lot of force. Theoretically, in this case, the milk carton gains the most elasticity. In other words, it confirms that it is possible to fall out of the movable space when it becomes larger.

Margarita, you do have some truth in what you say.

No, I'm speaking the truth.

Margarita, I think you're a little too confident.

……。

Whether it is true or not, leave it to time to verify!