When I see someone on the Internet scoffing at perpetual motion machines, I can't help but say a few words. Thinking about it, it's always been there. First of all, the physicists' rule of not relying on any energy source is a mistake, because you have to admit that there is a closed system in the universe. Otherwise, such a provision would be meaningless. Academically, there is nothing wrong with this. After all, the purest conditions reflect the laws of the object to the greatest extent. On the Internet, people often say that they have created a perpetual motion machine, which is the kind of physics. But I'm going to ask you when you made it, did you make a closed system? Aren't you saying my home is a closed system? No, of course not. Theoretically, it means that the energy from the outside world cannot come in and out. We know that all objects contain energy, and the heat in the energy must be emitted. Therefore, a closed system does not exist, and a physical perpetual motion machine is impossible. Their perpetual motion machine can only be a realistic version, that is, it will absorb energy from energy sources. Opponents always say that a perpetual motion machine violates the law of conservation of energy, which means a perpetual motion machine in physics. The real-life version of a perpetual motion machine has great possibilities because it breaks free from the law of conservation of energy. In fact, people always confuse the two types of perpetual motion machines. So, what problems does the real-life version of perpetual motion machine face? Forever. To solve the big problem of eternity, it is estimated that only infinity can be explained. So what do you mean by infinity and eternity? Mizukawa asked.

I believe that objects can have infinity, but I don't believe that objects can exist forever. Since it is a perpetual motion machine, doesn't that mean that no object can destroy it, including black holes? Motion requires energy, so how much energy does an object that is always in motion need? It's fine if the energy it needs is fixed, but what if it's not fixed? Wouldn't such a perpetual motion machine become a time bomb that would destroy the universe? Massive celestial bodies cause space-time to bend, and perpetual motion machines also cause space-time to bend. Duenas unceremoniously spoke his doubts.

This is well explained. You know malleability, right? The perpetual motion machine will deform, but it will soon recover. The reason for this is that it is extremely malleable. How much energy is needed? Determined by speed, there is no definite value. Space-time bending exists, but it has no effect on us.

Mizukawa rice, what happens when the speed is infinite?

No, speed is not infinite. Because two infinities cannot coexist.

Water, I think speed and time can be infinite. And infinity is the dimension of dimensional space. An infinite number of zeros is a one-dimensional object, and an infinite number of one-dimensional objects are two-dimensional objects. And so on. For each additional infinity, the dimension increases by one.

Margarita, isn't an infinite zero a zero?

Mizukawa rice, you think that zero is not and does not exist, but in fact this is not the correct view. I think that everything comes from zero, and zero is a number and an unreal existence. Of course, it does not mean that zero is applied to daily life, but that zero, like energy, objectively exists on top of the world. As for why infinite zeros are not zeros, I haven't thought about it yet. That's what I think, though. And, I believe that one day my guesses will be confirmed or falsified.

The three of them sighed: Margarita is really not an ordinary person. Mizukawa said again: I thought I thought that objects were infinite and very different, and I didn't want her to say zero.

……。