I'm sure everyone has an empty milk crate at home, and you've probably touched it at some point. However, it can stay on the move. I'm curious about what caused it, so let's answer my questions! Mizukawa said.

That's because it has a dump limit. Naturally, it is possible to move freely without exceeding the limit. Once, if the limit is exceeded, it will fall.

Dueñas, the shape is also the reason. The parallelogram can only be placed horizontally, but will not wiggle. The ladder can only be swung when it is reversed. However, the dumping limit does have a more impact.

If you fill an empty box, the dumping limit increases. However, the pouring limit is not arbitrarily increased. There is a limit here. This limit is called the loading limit. How so? When the milk carton is still unopened, it can be difficult to get it to swing.

The six sons of the wind come, in fact, the dumping limit is still divided into directions. The front and side ones are different, which is related to the shape of the milk crate. The milk crate has six sides, and it is upright. Therefore, the upper and lower sides do not need to be considered. However, the toppling of the object is still related to the upper and lower sides. There are four sides left. Since the milk crate is symmetrical, the four sides are actually equal in pairs. Therefore, there are two pouring limits. The front side is based on the length of the bottom surface as the moving axis, and the width of the bottom surface as the swing length. Because of the short swing length, the swing frequency is higher than that of the side. The side side is based on the width of the bottom surface as the moving axis, and the length of the bottom surface as the swing length. Therefore, the swing length is long. Thus, it can be seen that the underside has a great influence on the toppling of the object.

Margarita, in fact, the placement of the milk crate will also affect its pouring limit. Placed face up, the other sides are smaller than it, so there is no tipping. As a result, there is no tipping limit. There is a tipping limit for side-facing placements. The analysis of the immovable axis and the placement length is the same as that of the bottom-up placement.

The specific situation of the dumping limit fully speaks of the effect of the yin shape on the object. However, this is not the case, and the cup has only one surface in addition to the upper and lower sides. Then, the swinging length of the cup should be the circumference of the bottom circle. However, I observed that it was actually the diameter of the circle on the bottom surface. When it comes to placement, the cup has three sides, two of which are roughly the same. It stands to reason that there should be two swings at this point. However, there are theoretically an infinite number of ways to place the cup when it is placed on its side. Either way, there is no limit to the pouring.

The bottom surface of the sieve has a tendency to curve, which greatly increases the pouring limit. When the angle between the sieve and the horizontal direction is greater than 90 degrees, the sieve will tipple. In fact, the sieve was made like this in order to make the pouring limit larger. In other words, the swing length is longer. The longer the length of the swing, the higher the degree of sieve. As a result, the efficiency is higher.

The bottle is placed upside down, and the swing length is the diameter of the bottom circle. This is a special case. Originally, the length or width of the side should be the swing length. Since the sides of the bottle are curved, but not cylindrical. Eventually, this situation arises. Here's a detail. If the side of the object is not flat or cylindrical, then the tipping limit of the object must be the key line of the plane figure with the shortest circumference. If it's rectangular, it's long or wide. If it's a circle, it's the diameter. Mizukawa added.