In economics there is the industrial chain and the capital chain, while in biology there is the food chain. I think there is also a chain for heat transfer, but I am not sure whether there is also a chain for force transfer.

And today we are mainly talking about the heat transfer chain. My question is, is there one or more transmission chains?

This raises the question of whether temperature differences are universal. Could there be two isothermal objects?

Is heat transferred to one object or to multiple objects? What are your thoughts on this?

Mizukawa wrote down the question and showed it to them. First, to answer the first question, there are multiple delivery chains.

Because if it's one, the heat transfer will be non-stop no matter what. Eventually, the temperature of all objects in the world will drop to absolute zero.

And isn't there no place for such heat to exist? And if there are multiple transmission chains, the problem mentioned above is solved.

Different transfer chains have different transfer initiation temperatures. An object with the highest temperature in heat transfer is likely to encounter two objects that are cooler than it.

Depending on the nature of heat transfer, it may transfer to two objects. Then, these two relatively low temperature objects are also dispersed in the transfer.

With the gradual decentralization, there are more and more transmission chains. Due to the sun's irradiation, the temperature of the object increases.

The original transmission chain is broken, and a new transmission chain is created. However, we know that the sun shines on the Earth every day.

As a result, the chain of transmission is constantly being broken and rebuilt. Dueñas spoke logically and analytically.

The three of them couldn't help but say to him: It's good. I have a question: Is there an end point to the delivery chain? According to Dueñas, the chain of transmission cannot go on indefinitely.

Then, this is to say that yin has an end. But is that really the case? To answer this question, it is necessary to discuss whether all objects have temperature differences.

If there are both, then absolute zero is the end of it. It stands to reason that all objects should be reduced to absolute zero.

Of course, this is the case where the absorption of heat by the object is not taken into account. In geography, there are isotherms. Since both isotherms can exist, why don't two objects with equal temperatures exist?

In this way, it can be said that some transmission chains do have an end. And the objects are interactive, so that the other transmission chains also actually have an end.

It is a good strategy for the six sons to find their own logical basis in Dueñas's argument.

。 Dueñas says that the heat of one object A is partially transferred to two objects B and C, so I have to ask if there is a loss in the process of object A to object B?

We know that it takes energy for an object to get from one location to another, but what about heat?

Heat itself is energy, do you have to consume yourself? Real objects need to pay the price of energy, but what does non-real heat need?

I don't think the heat needs anything else. However, when he reached the closest object to him, a portion of the heat was emitted into the air.

When the six winds come to mention isotherms, does this mean that objects with the same yin temperature must appear in ensembles?

Perhaps only two objects were isothermal at first, and later on, with the similarity of heat transfer, the end temperature and their temperature were the same.

Margarita was talking too, and the shadow felt a little different.