Sometimes it's bold to think about it. Imagine that magnetoelectricity has been discovered in the field of physics.

But can electricity generate magnetism? No one thinks about it. But Faraday thought so.

Through experiments, he discovered inductive induction. And the first step to bold imagination is to ask questions. A molecule is a very common microscopic particle in science, but is it really ordinary?

Could it be that its ordinariness is just a matter of our assumptions? We know a few biological macromolecules and inorganic small molecules, but we don't know much about them.

German philosophers say that to exist is to be reasonable. Just as the law of conservation of energy has preconditions, it has its own scope of application.

We know that molecules are moving irregularly, so there must be a reason for it.

You might say that this is an application of the law of cause and effect, but in fact there is not always a causal relationship between two things.

In this regard, I say that the law of cause and effect must exist. First of all, everything is in motion, and motion inevitably affects the surrounding objects.

In this world, every object does not exist in isolation. From the perspective of the universe as a whole, the law of cause and effect is by no means accidental.

Back to the topic. Molecule. Let's use your imagination to speak freely! Everything has a source, and philosophy is the basis of Mizukawa's thinking and logic.

The essence of deformation is a change in shape. So, why did the shape change? We know that molecules are the most basic microscopic particles that make up objects, and there is no bigger microscopic particle than it.

In this case, if the shape of the object changes, the molecules are not affected at all. Thinking about this, I thought that the deformation of the object was probably due to the falling of molecules.

Of course, the molecule here is marginal partial. The deeper reason is that the van der Waals force between the molecules of the marginal part is less than the external force.

There is also the force constraint between the two molecules inside that is broken by an external force. It's like an inflated balloon, poke the dented part with your hand.

Liuzifeng's words are indeed a bit earth-shattering, which is shocking. My question is connected to yours.

Are the molecules at the edge of the object bare or connected to other molecules? In other words, are they like threads on clothes or a head left out after a shoelace is knotted?

Maybe you didn't take this into account in your analysis of the problem. If the marginal molecules are exposed, then the deformation is likely to result in the molecules entering the object and becoming entangled with other molecules.

Different objects have different situations. The edge molecules of a malleable object are like fishing nets, so they must be exposed at the edge of the object.

If there is no malleability, such as wood, the edge molecules should be connected to other molecules like the nodes of the cube network.

Dueñas added to the question of the coming of the six sons, making the question more gloomy and clear.

。 My question is not as complex as yours should be. Who provides the energy for molecular motion?

Perhaps you will say, without thinking, of course the object itself. So, where do you get the object from?

Organisms can obtain energy by absorbing nutrients from the outside world, while non-living things cannot obtain a lot of energy? So where does the energy it provides to the molecule come from?

Previously, we mentioned irrational numbers. And I think that's the problem. Precisely because the value of a variable of an object is an irrational number, and an irrational number has numerical energy.

The energy of molecular motion is provided by irrational numbers, and the infinite non-circulation of irrational numbers is the reason for the irregular motion of molecules.

Margarita's question, though simple in narrative, is difficult to falsify. It is as difficult to prove that the value of a variable is irrational than that of a general formula for solving prime numbers.

Suddenly, Margarita said, I have one more question: the molecules of the object are moving irregularly, so is it possible for them to collide?

I don't think it will bump into. Isn't it incredible? Yin and Yin are doing irregular movements, and the molecules actually don't collide?

In fact, although irrational numbers seem to have no reason, their arrangement conforms to the decimal digit carrying law.

If two molecules collide, irrational numbers cannot continue to exist in the object. In short, it is a sentence: irrational numbers also have regularities.