In linguistics, there is a molecule. When we went to school, our teacher told us to be part of the class.

And we know that molecules are derived from molecules. After all, we all have molecules in our bodies.

If we are molecules, it is easy to produce ambiguity, causing confusion in semantic expression. In order to avoid this, there was a single side.

The generalization of terms is a special linguistic phenomenon, and it is a typical representative. Although the physical movement of molecules was not directly described by ancient poets, it can also be found through analysis.

Lu You, a famous poet in the Northern Song Dynasty, has a poem about the sudden stop of flowers, which is a physical phenomenon caused by the movement of flower molecules.

As the saying goes, the aroma of wine is not afraid of deep alleys, and the same is true of the smell produced when ethanol molecules are in motion.

The ink drips into the water and spreads, which is naturally a manifestation of molecular movement. Aren't we guessing whether molecules fall off when they are in motion?

I think that even if it doesn't fall, the spread of smell doesn't mean that some molecules of yin move away from the object.

If so, then it is not impossible for the molecule to fall. Recently, when I was reading "The Laws of Prime Numbers", I realized that some laws are not universally applicable.

For example, conservation is not applicable in weak interactions. Yang Zhenning and Li Tsung-dao discovered that the products of the decay of theta and τ are different, the former has two π mesons and the latter has three π mesons.

The physics community at the time could not explain this phenomenon. Because they think that theta and τ are the same kind of particle, and the result of decay proves that yin is not.

It was a dark cloud in the world of physics that plagued physicists at the time. Yang Zhenning and Lee Tsung-dao pondered this phenomenon with a fearless spirit, and in their research, they made the famous discovery that the universe is not conserved.

Later, the negative was obtained in the spatial inversion symmetry that the left-handed neutrino destroys. We can't ignore the details when we think, because that's the manifestation of a great law.

Okay, now it's time to get down to business. So, let's play freely! Mizukawa continues to talk about cases related to molecular movements.

We know that the Earth rotates and revolves, but we don't move all the time. In the same way, is it possible to assume that atoms, protons, and quarks are not in motion because of molecules?

The atoms are bound by chemical bonds and it seems impossible for them to move. The proton is in the nucleus, and the nucleus is very binding.

It also seems impossible to make movements. Whereas, quarks have confinement. If a quark is not in motion, then how can it be confined?

Although physicists have not yet discovered particles smaller or more fundamental than quarks, they are not incomposable.

In addition to confinement, there is also the phenomenon of progressive freedom. If quarks are stationary, there should be no progressive freedom.

It may be said that as long as the particles are not the lowest particles, they should be bound by some kind of force to produce a structure.

Due to the existence of this structure, it is impossible for particles to move all the time. It is easy to know that the shape of a fluid changes with the movement of molecules, but why doesn't a solid change shape with the movement of molecules?

There are forces between molecules, and solid molecules are larger than fluid molecules. But the problem remains unresolved.

The intermolecular forces are great, but the movement of the molecules is also going on. Even if van der Waals could undo some of the shape changes, shouldn't the rest of the changes still exist?

We know that van der Waals forces are forces between two molecules, that is, one molecule can be subjected to multiple van der Waals forces through permutations and combinations.

Imaginatively, the molecules at the periphery are exposed to very little van der Waals force and much more to the center.

It is the small number of molecules at the edges that results in no visible change in shape at the macroscopic level. However, fringe molecules are rarely affected by van der Waals forces.

Therefore, I think that the surface tension of the object is most likely due to the change in shape. Thus, the shape of the solid is slightly changed on the surface and not on the inside.

Dueñas does not directly draw conclusions, but proceeds from phenomena. This makes the conclusion more convincing.

。 As Duenas said earlier, one molecule is subject to more than one van der Waals force. That being the case, there must be mutual interference between the two molecules when they are moving.

We think that molecular motion is irregular, and that's when we look at it as a whole. From an individual point of view, the molecular movement is obvious.

It's like an irrational number, it seems to be irregular. However, it conforms to the decimal carrying rule.

However, it is not known what the law of carrying is. In the same way, how molecules interact with each other will need to be observed for a long time before a conclusion can be reached.

Einstein's theory of relativity says that yin mass and energy are two sides of the same coin, and motion increases mass.

Molecular motion will inevitably increase the mass of the object, so what is the mass of motion?

Molecules are in motion all the time, and so is nature when objects are in motion. Perhaps then, the mass of motion is caused by the absorption of energy by molecules.

When the mass of the molecule increases, it causes a chain reaction of molecular movement. In order to maintain their original state of motion, molecules will inevitably release the energy carried by the moving mass after the end of the motion of the object.

The Six Sons came to supplement Dueñas's words and introduce new content. So, sometimes the method is important.

Dueñas said that van der Waals forces are forces between molecules, so the analysis must affect each other.

He also said that the Van der Waals force on the marginal molecules is very small, so I think that the Van der Waals force is the largest for the molecules at the geometric center of the object.

I think it's the key molecule that controls other molecules. As long as its motion is made orderly, then the molecular motion can become orderly.

Since molecules are mutually influencing, or there is a chain of motion among molecules. It is precisely because of the existence of this chain of motion that the object must turn the chain of motion when turning.

And the steering of the kinematic chain is not so easy, because the molecules are accustomed to the original state of the kinematic chain.

It seems that everyone likes to replenish, and Margarita is no exception.