In language, many words are synonymous. But it's not exactly synonymous. For example, France and France also have Gaul, France refers to the hexagonal country located in the western part of Europe, while France refers to West Francia, which split from the Franks, and Gaul refers to the ancient regional names of some modern countries in the Roman era before the Franks, including Switzerland and France. However, they generally include the whole of ancient France. Both matter and object can mean the same thing, just like weight and mass. Of course, the object is more inclined to the spoken language. Matter, on the other hand, is used more in philosophy. The difference in use is what differentiates them. Somebody actually means me, but it's not just me. A certain word is meant to mean random, any. From the point of view of expression, it is more to emphasize that he is just a certain person. As for who it was, it was not clear. Of course, I am the same. In general, middle-aged people may prefer to use someone. First, someone is obviously more analyzable than I am. Second, the ancient atmosphere is heavier. It turns out that people in ancient times were prone to call themselves like this. Let's go back to matter and objects. There is a slight difference between an object and a substance. Objects refer to non-living organisms, while matter includes people. Philosophical matter is more discovered from people.

Speaking of confusion, we have to mention ambiguity. When it comes to translation, ambiguity is the most challenging. Chinese say meat generally refers to pork, and Westerners say meat generally refers to beef. If there is an article that says, I'm going to buy meat. So, how should meat here be translated? One or two is certainly easy to solve, but what about many? Without a unified approach, not only will your own thinking be disrupted, but the reader will also be distracted. If you want to translate meat into pork, you have to say that the Yin Chinese like to eat mainly pork, and this cannot appear in the text. With the exception of history books, any book that uses this method is likely to cause misreading by readers. Poetry translation is the hardest hit area of ambiguity. There has always been controversy about which translation of the poem best fits the original mood. For me, every translation is good. After all, something is better than nothing.

To say confusion is to say paradox. There are many paradoxes in philosophy and mathematics, and they are always talked about. The liar's paradox is undoubtedly the hottest of them all, but if you think about it, confusion is the biggest reason. Some people say that what I say is all false. This is the full proposition in logic. But do you want everyone to be an individual and be able to meet all the requirements? You say that what you say is false, then whether this sentence is true or false. If this statement is true, then you are indeed telling a lie. But didn't you tell the truth, so you didn't say everything you said that was false. And in this way, it cannot be deduced that what you say is false, and this sentence is true, so there is a logical loophole. In fact, one of the key points of the liar's paradox is whether the words you use to say whether your words are true or false should not be counted as what you say. We know it should count. Then, when he says this, he cannot guarantee that he is telling the truth and falsehood. It's a bit like Hilbert adding infinity and infinity to one. I mentioned real infinity and adjacent integer infinity, and infinity here is a false infinity, or not real infinity. It is possible that it is an infinite number of adjacent integers. For example, there are infinite decimal places between 3 and 4, and this infinity is not a real infinity. I think that as long as there is no real infinity, the infinity can be added to one, so here I am confusing the two infinities.

If it had been in the past, the discussion would have ended. But there is a development in everything. And I think the discussion should continue, so let's use our own energy! Mizukawa didn't seem to look at his watch, and it took thirty minutes at once.

We always hear about heat and heat, but is there a difference between them? We know that energy has the words energy and quantity, and heat and heat obviously come from energy. I thought there was a difference, but the formula again said there was no difference. Perhaps, they are originally interchangeable synonyms! Originally, I thought that there was no difference between momentum and kinetic energy, but I found out that they were different through the formula. Momentum is equal to the product of velocity and mass, whereas kinetic energy is momentum multiplied by velocity. Didn't we collect a few conservations earlier, and among them there is the conservation of momentum. I was thinking why there is only conservation of momentum, why is kinetic energy not conserved? I know that it is impossible to make multiple numbers equal and multiple square numbers equal at the same time, and one of them must not be satisfied. Dueñas probably didn't want to say more this time, so let's be brief!

Duenias seemed to remember something and said: I have something else to say. Thermal energy is the amount of change in temperature, while internal energy is the sum of kinetic and potential energy. Many people confuse them because they don't understand how they behave.

When it comes to confusion, how can you not mention angular momentum and momentum. I always thought that angular momentum was a type of momentum. Although the formula is not negative, angular momentum is still based on momentum. Whereas, it is equal to the momentum multiplied by the distance from the mass to the center of rotation. Fact table Yin angle momentum is only present when the object is rotating, whereas momentum is present in all states of motion.

In particle physics, there is the concept of spin. Many popular science videos say that spin and rotation are different. The reason for this is that the number of rotations of the spin is not always 1, or more often than not. Of course, there are also particles with spin of 1. I think a spin of 1 should be considered a rotation. It seems that everyone is unanimously pursuing minimalism.,And that's the case with the six sons.。。

Dueñas mentioned kinetic energy, and I'll talk about potential energy. There are five types of potential energy, gravitational potential energy, molecular potential energy, elastic potential energy, magnetic field potential energy, and electric potential energy, and another classification is gravitational potential energy, gravitational potential energy, and elastic potential energy. Both electricity and magnetism can generate each other, and the electromagnetic force is a sign of electromagnetic unity. In this way, I can't help but wonder if the electric potential energy and the magnetic field potential energy are the same? The electric potential energy is related to the amount of charge and the distance of the charge, and the potential energy of the magnetic field depends on whether the magnetic field is uniform or not. Judging by the formula, they are not the same. When I first looked at gravitational potential energy and gravitational potential energy, I thought they were the same. However, by formula. Gravitational potential energy is equal to gravity multiplied by height, whereas gravitational potential energy is the product of the mass of two objects multiplied by the gravitational constant multiplied by the distance between the two. There is only one gravitational potential energy for an object, while there are many gravitational potential energies. In general, the gravitational potential energy is greater than the gravitational potential energy. When reading the encyclopedia, it says that elastic potential energy and kinetic energy can be converted into each other? I wondered why? The reason may be that they are all produced by movement, and they need to be embodied by movement.

I have me milk yogurt here, do you want to drink it? Margarita was also very brief, but in the end, it came out like this. When the three of them heard that there was yogurt, they naturally couldn't help it. So, the four of them drank yogurt.