The axon is a quasiparticle that is said to be related to dark matter. Physicists speculate that it is likely to be the particle that makes up dark matter.

Dark matter and dark energy are both undiscovered physical quantities, accounting for 20/100 and 70/100 of the mass of the universe, respectively.

It's a strange thing that this size hasn't been discovered. We know that we can see objects because of light, and the appearance of light allows us to recognize the existence of objects.

It is said that there is an object called an absolute black body. It doesn't reflect light, so we can't see it.

So, is dark matter an absolute black body? I don't think so. The energy that can be obtained by an object is naturally light energy at most.

If dark matter rejects light at all, then wouldn't it become a passive well? Mizukawa said. We know that an object loses electrons and gets a positive charge, whereas an object gets a negative charge.

Electric charge is produced because of electrons. If an object is to have an electric charge, isn't it necessary to have electrons?

The axions are quasiparticles, not atomic-level particles. It stands to reason that the shaft should not contain electrons.

Therefore, there is no electric charge. It makes sense to say that. We know that neutrons are not charged, but neutrons have electrons.

Once a neutron loses its electrons, it becomes a proton and becomes a positive charge. So, do neutrons have an electric charge?

Some say yes, some say no. And I said yes, but not now. From this, I am reminded of the rule that the number of baryons of the meson is zero.

I think maybe particle physicists are forcing the charge of the axes to zero purely for the sake of the self-consistency of a theory.

Just as the baryon number is conserved for the baryon number, the zero charge here is actually to conform to the law of conservation of charge.

Because once the axon is involved in the particle reaction, there must be a change in charge. If the charge is not regulated, then the law of conservation of charge cannot be universally applied.

Didn't we talk about anyons earlier? Sometimes, zero doesn't mean nothing. For example, some particles have zero spin.

However, it's not without spin. Because everywhere it looks the same, as if there is no spin.

However, the spin is actually carried out. It's like 2x²+2=10 and x²+1=5 are equivalent if the algebraic x range is the same.

A spin of zero is positionally equivalent to no spin, but it is not the same. However, the fact that the charge of the shaft is zero does mean that it has no charge.

There is a difference between a prescriptive zero and a natural zero. It can be said that this kind of rule of the axle is zero, which means that there is none.

And zero in nature means that there is still a possibility. For example, the height of a two-dimensional space is zero, which is a kind of natural zero.

We know that zero is also a number. In life, zero doesn't mean much. However, if you think about it, you will find something different.

We can do the math with numbers, and zero is no exception. In the world, there is a difference between having no height and having zero height.

For example, you may not have Ethiopia in your memory. I don't know anything about it.

Suddenly, one day, someone said about the country of Ethiopia. At the time, you felt the novelty. But it didn't take long for it to be forgotten.

So, at this point, zero can really indicate the existence of a variable. Just like the height of two-dimensional space, it is not always zero.

What did the two-dimensional space look like in the beginning? If two-dimensional space has been zero in height since the universe was created, then it should have no height from beginning to end.

If it wasn't zero at the beginning, then it makes sense to have zero now. We said before that dimension is one infinity, and two-dimensional space is two infinities.

Of course, the infinite here is not the real infinity, but the interval infinity. This infinity may be an integer infinity, or it may be other infinity.

。 Charges are divided into particle charges and matter charges. The charge due to the gain and loss of electrons is the charge of matter.

Whereas, the spin component and the isospin component produce a particle charge. Very intriguingly, the charge of the shaft refers to the charge of the particle.

Liuzifeng said. There are thousands of words, how can they be said? There are endless details, how can they be exhausted? However, heaven and earth have their own laws, and discussions cannot be endless.

Now that we have said that, it is time to conclude our discussion for today. Mizukawa said.