We know that a vacuum means a blank space where there is not even air, but how can there be a vacuum zero point here?

Vacuum zero energy is generated by measuring the Kashmir force. According to quantum field theory, the universe is full of virtual particles.

Gravitons are considered virtual particles, and particle physicists have not yet discovered them. Objects made up of real particles vibrate and collide with virtual particles, resulting in the Kashmir force.

Note that a vacuum simply denotes emptiness as space and not emptiness as a container. As a pure space, it contains no other objects.

However, that doesn't mean other objects can't come in. For example, light can move in a vacuum. In other words, there are no stationary objects in a vacuum, and every object just passes through it.

However, the little heat energy left by the object in the vacuum is extremely limited. It does not seem strange that a vacuum has a zero point of energy.

You think that if a vacuum really doesn't have anything, then it shouldn't accept nothing. Therefore, it stands to reason that a vacuum should deny any object access to its interior.

Thus, it becomes an absolute vacuum. If so, the vacuum has a lot of energy to prevent external objects from entering it.

However, although the energy is virtual, it is not a real existence. However, energy is still a kind of existence after all.

That is to say, there is something in an absolute vacuum, such as energy. Thus, a vacuum cannot become an absolute vacuum.

The high energy density of the vacuum is the reason for the yin. In order for any object not to stay in a vacuum, the vacuum must have a huge amount of energy to drive the object away.

Vacuum decay. Do you think it has something to do with vacuum? In fact, this is the same as the Antarctic Wall, which needs to be paid attention to.

The vacuum here does not refer to a space, but to an energy state. When in the lowest energy state, it is called a true vacuum.

In the excited state, it is called a pseudovacuum. Why do we say decay, is it really the decay of particles?

In fact, it is the quantum that jumps from a higher energy level to a lower energy level. In the past, I always thought that photons were produced by the transition of electrons, and that electrons were transitioning from a lower energy level to a higher energy level.

I thought there must have been a transition of electrons from higher to lower energy levels, and now it seems to be true. So, what is the pattern of this transition?

It turns out that at the time of the transition, the period experienced shows a decreasing trend of semi-decay. This means that the cathode quantum still follows the principle of lowest energy.

As the quantum gets closer and closer to the lowest energy level, the speed of the transition becomes faster. It's like skydiving.

The time it takes you to jump from a height of 10,000 meters is naturally different from that of a height of 100 meters. Although quantum fluctuations are much more complex to explain, they can be simply understood as the phenomenon of position uncertainty caused by quantum fluctuations.

It is said that the Casimir effect is related to quantum fluctuations. Jupiter and Saturn have rings around them, and this is the effect of gravity on them.

The surrounding ring is full of dust, all bound by their gravitational pull. The energy is all around us, but we can't see it.

It's like an unpredictable weather, and it's puzzling. I remember hearing about energy when I was in school and didn't feel that much different, and then I heard a chicken soup blogger talk about positive energy.

I thought there were positive and negative aspects of energy, and then I realized that there were people who really put forward the concept of negative energy in the area of time travel.

We always say that there is no energy, but in fact, they are all provided by energy. Mizukawa sent the article to the three of them, and all three of them gave different opinions.