We knew that the juicer could beat walnuts, so I was thinking about how the rotor could beat the walnuts finely.

Didn't you say it earlier, it was caused by eddy currents. When it comes to hardness, walnuts are bigger. However, it is not much bigger.

According to common sense, walnuts should last longer. However, I didn't find a noticeable difference.

We know that there are many types of hardness, Brinell, Rockwell, and Vickers are some of them.

Regardless of that hardness, a walnut will not have a hardness value of two units higher than an apple. Moreover, due to the inherently fast speed of the rotor.

This virtually forms the hardness of the movement. The hardness of paper at rest is almost negligible, and of course the thicker ones are different.

It has been proved that using a piece of paper as a rotor makes it reach a speed of 1000 per revolution. As a result, the piece of paper can actually cut the coconut.

The hardness of the coconut shell can be seen in contrast. Although the hardness of hard walnuts is not low, it is significantly inferior to the coconut shell.

This can be done after a piece of paper moving at high speeds, and no movement hardness can explain it. The fire is hot, but as long as you are in contact with the fire for no more than a second.

Theoretically, you just don't feel hot. This is because when a person's hand touches fire, the nerves in the hand transmit signals to the brain.

The brain cells of the brain then communicate with each other to make decisions. This process is obviously not something that can be done in a second.

Since it is rotation, I think of the symmetry of rotation in space. The properties of an object exhibited by clockwise rotation are the same as those exhibited by counterclockwise rotation.

While there is symmetry in the world, there are also symmetry breaks. For example, neutrinos are always left-handed, while antineutrinos are always right-handed.

But what we know is that particles have two spins. Either left-handed or right-handed. There is absolutely no such thing as having only one spin direction.

This is because they both have spatial inversion symmetry. Due to the presence of neutrinos, the symmetry of the reactions in which they participate is broken.

Since the spatial inversion symmetry corresponds to the conservation of the universe, it is proved that the universe can be non-conserved.

Through thought experiments, it can be seen that the symmetry of space rotation is not broken. When we talk about rotation, we have to talk about vortex.

So, the energy of the upward vortex is the same as the energy of the downward vortex? We know that the upward vortex not only has to maintain its own rotation, but also bears the gravitational pull of the downward vortex.

So, the vortex at the bottom actually has more energy. Since we talk about eddy currents, do the upward vortices stop first or the downward vortices stop first?

We said that the former has more energy, note that this refers to the energy that comes from movement. That being the case, when the rotor stops rotating, the former moves more energy than the latter.

However, since the former is under more pressure, the former must exercise for a shorter period of time than the latter.

So which one stops first? We know that the position of the rotor is very low, so the motion energy of the former is not 1/10 more than that of the latter.

I think the former will stop first. There is a saying that the blades of a rotor that are not full are all 3, such as the blades of a fan and a juicer.

Prime numbers can prevent the occurrence of certain dangers and promote the emergence of certain beneficial phenomena. I observed, and it did.

Although the juice machine is ordinary, there are many rules in it. If there is a suitable opportunity in the future, I may probably come back and talk about it.