When the news of the award for the film "Golden Age" came out, the media naturally reported it heavily.

The public has also joined the hot discussion.

"Last time Liu Yiqian was shortlisted for the award, I was still a passer-by who didn't care, but this time I was very nervous for two days, and I used to tell the bitterness and tiredness in the filming process wittily, especially the breakthrough of myself over the years, not to mention a word of pressure, and now I finally came to God to reward hard work, and I have accumulated a lot of money to achieve the unstoppable "Golden Age", the actors respect the audience, and the audience loves you very much, of course, I am a fan now, hahahaha."

"When I first joined the Canadian work, I had the opportunity to visit Xiao Hong's former residence, and I didn't read a single of her books at that time, and I didn't know anything about Xiao Hong's life.

Now, I have read "Life and Death Field", "The Biography of Hulan River", "The Biography of Xiao Hong" and also watched "Golden Age" directed by Xu Anhua, to be honest, without the foreshadowing in front, this movie is really a bit difficult to understand, thanks to Luo Binji, who made the biography for Xiao Hong, let us see Xiao Hong's life, thanks to Xu Anhua, and restored Xiao Hong's life.

In fact, Xiao Hong and Xu Anhua have the same trait, that is, they tell things as they are, without any judgment, but just tell them in a real way, so that people who understand her can empathize..."

"I like Liu Yiqian very much, and I also like the movie Xu Anhua and "Golden Age".

But this does not prevent me from watching Xu Anhua talk about all kinds of regrets in her heart. I also feel that "Golden Age" has all kinds of regrets. Many people don't understand that regret is not a total denial, but in any artistic creation, regret is a norm, and so is writing, and so is film.

All accomplished art creators have one thing in common, that is, they always want their works to be better.

Those who ponder the regrets of their own creations endlessly, and are easily satisfied with themselves, are not real artists, and they will not excel at all.

If Xu Anhua hadn't been able to get along with herself like this, she wouldn't have achieved what she is today. Any great director has this trait. The only difference is that some people tell you these experiences, and some people don't. This has to do with the director's personality and also with the director's age. Xu Anhua is 75 years old, many people are still young, and people won't tell you all about my experience. What does that person eat?

It's just that the writer is created by himself, and the regrets are all my own. But the nature of the director's work is there, and when she talks about her creative regrets, it is impossible not to talk about the actors, because that is part of the work and part of the regrets.

As long as you share your experience, you can't avoid it, and if you say good things, it's not a real experience sharing. However, on the other hand, for the audience, it is the listener's personal ability to distinguish between dry goods sharing and useless complaints.

[The app that has been running stably for many years is comparable to the old version of the book-chasing artifact, which is used by old bookworms.]

Before I watched this movie, many people had a pretty good evaluation of this film, but how to listen to what others said, in fact, I can't empathize, especially some people, who don't like to watch literary films so much, but the people who were recommended by me to watch this movie still feel that this movie is somewhat boring after watching it.

Even in fact, among the many praises on the Internet, I can also find a small number of negative reviews, and most of these negative reviews are saying that the movie is too long, and it took 3 hours to understand what to do, and the director is interpreting Xiao Hong in his own way, which is a kind of self-deception of young women in literature and art, which is not a golden age at all.

It is always impossible for everyone to say that a work is good, and there are always people who say that it is bad, which is also normal, and most people can say that it is good.

Anyway, I didn't stop going to the cinema to watch this movie because of this bad review, on the contrary, I was still looking forward to it, so I watched this movie energetically in fatigue.

After watching it, I think it's very good, the picture is very beautiful, the rhythm is also very smooth, at least the things are explained clearly, and on some important issues (such as the plot of Xiao Hong and Xiao Jun's breakup), the statements of the three people are quoted, and the director's intentions can be seen.

The Academy Awards are well deserved.

Among the actors in the movie, what satisfies me (or impresses me) is the one who plays Liu Yiqian's fiancé, hahaha, who is Liu Yiqian's husband in reality.

Although he can also be regarded as the male protagonist in this movie, in fact, the length of time he appears in the whole movie is too short, but the small plot where he appeared made me see a vivid character, especially the serious appearance of this character at some moments is still a little handsome, worthy of Xiao Hong's favorite man, that kind of charm is really evocative.

It's just that these two endings are not very good, and in the end they parted ways, and when I watched it at the time, I especially hoped that the two of them could be together forever, and it was not bad that the years were quiet, but even if the two of them were separated, I was not so sad, but there was a trace of melancholy.

Because this is Xiao Hong's life, and Xiao Hong's psychological activities are also very understandable, and I can probably accept the so-called parting caused by various reasons and social situations at that time.

Another point, I have to say, to be honest, in fact, I don't know if it's because the hero and heroine themselves are not so famous characters, so Xu Hengzhou and Liu Yiqian played better, or what's going on.

Anyway, I see that some of the other supporting characters are of course very outstanding, and some of them can't see the temperament that matches the historical figures at all, and I have a headache when I look at them.

Anyway, every time I see the monologues of these so-called historical figures, I have a special play, of course, this only exists in a few characters, but it is these few characters that make me want to skip these clips and watch other characters appear directly.

But to be honest, this way of letting historical figures make monologues and highlight what kind of person Xiao Hong is is is really novel, and it doesn't give me a very divided feeling at all.

Anyway, before I watched it, many people said that the plot would be very scattered if they engaged in the monologues of various historical figures like this, but I didn't think so.

I feel like it's a documentary, a sense of documenting history, looking back at history.

Of course, for the monologues of historical figures that I feel are playing, I can't criticize the actors' acting skills.

Maybe my standards are too high, "Golden Age" tells the story of famous literary and artistic young people, and among these young actors in China, there are too few people with such cultural literacy.

Not to mention cultural literacy, the entertainment industry is mixed, many people know what wine leaks fish is, everyone understands it.

But I firmly believe that academic qualifications are not the most important, the important thing is personal learning, I think these actors must not stop learning after they go out of society, so there is no good class for them to continue their education?

Or I think actors also need to take some qualifications, divided into primary, intermediate, advanced, etc., otherwise, the cultural knowledge of actors is really not up to the mark.

Anyway, I think it's the actor's problem if there's a problem, so I can't criticize the director, she is careful about this film.

Just like director Xu Anhua once said in an interview, she is a person who is not very critical of actors.

Usually she will tell the actor what she thinks first, but whether the actor will act according to her is uncertain.

Generally speaking, if an actor approves of her, I believe she will act according to what she says, but there are some actors who just don't trust the director.

If those actors perform in their own way, then there is nothing they can do.

In this respect, she feels that she herself is a director who is not very good at managing actors.

I won't comment on this aspect, anyway, I think this movie is good-looking, especially with some narration excerpts from Xiao Hong's prose, which is very tasteful.

When watching movies, it is enough to enjoy those beautiful pictures and beautiful sentences."

"I think this film deserves to win the award.

First of all, the aesthetic experience of the film is very good, although the rhythm and sense of the plot are hard and long, and it is difficult to stick to it.

But the latest cinematic approach is refreshing.

However, the attempt to innovate in the film circle actually relies on this long-famous female director to try, which shows that there is a lack of talent in the Xiangjiang film industry.

In addition, as a young year of the Academy Awards, Chen Guo and Zhuang Mai did not play too hard, and Chen Kexin's subject matter limited his award, and it may be the best choice to award it to Xu Anhua as an encouragement to encourage innovation."

"Let's talk about the name of the film, what the so-called Golden Age means.

At first, I thought it might be that it was an era as bright as gold, with countless innocent hearts, literati and righteous people.

As a result, after watching this movie, I found that this movie was actually on the topic.

Because such a letter appeared in this movie, and the title of the film comes from this letter written by Xiao Hong to Xiao Jun:

"When the window was full of white moons, I was willing to turn off the lights and sit down in silence for a while, and in this silence, suddenly a wake-up call came to my heart: "Isn't this my golden age? At the moment." 」

The movie "Golden Age", whether it is the director, screenwriter, or actors, they all show 100% sincerity and 100% professionalism.

For many people in the film industry, "Golden Age" has become the ultimate classic in their hearts! But the audience didn't buy it.

When I watched "The Golden Age", I cried several times, and I only felt a burst of sadness entrenched in my heart, and if I was not careful, I would taste bitter. In the movie, when Xiao Hong picked up the dilapidated enamel basin to drink water, I felt that life under the lens of Xu Anhua became real and chilling.

Xiao Hong is also a talented female writer in the end, but when poverty oppresses her like a villain, the embarrassment she reveals is somewhat cruel and ironic. At that time, the life of the literati was also precarious.

The tone of the whole era has also become heavy and turbulent.

It is not like Zhang Ailing's "waterfront flowers" situation, it belongs to the war and chaos, and it also belongs to the upheaval and displacement.

In the movie, Xiao Hong's eating appearance is also extremely realistic, and even carries some absurdity.

When her fiancé was kicked to the ground by his brother, Xiao Hong was still eating.

Her mouth did not stop, but her eyes were a little wandering and melancholy. She couldn't grasp where her fate was going, she just knew very well that she might not be able to live long.

When Xiao Jun first brought her to the circle of friends, while everyone else was busy rehearsing, she and Xiao Jun watched and ate cookies.

That day, Xiao Hong ate one piece after another, and also gave Xiao Jun one piece after another. When I saw this scene, I heard someone around me sighing.

Regarding the sophistication of human feelings, Xiao Hong is almost in a state of ignorance. She was like a child, but she was able to use her own

Innocence to sting the people around you. Her loneliness, her pain, can be seen by others. In the film, Xu Guangping's evaluation of Xiao Hong is also a little slight, she is always like this, she sits for a long time when she comes, and she doesn't care if others are busy or not.

She is like a traveler walking in the snow and ice, once she comes to a warm corner, she will rush to it desperately, and then stay there for a long time. After the relationship between her and Xiao Jun went wrong, her loneliness was all in her eyes.

She often went to Zhou Shuren, and the two sat opposite each other for a long time.

For this film, Xu Anhua did not splash ink to describe the relationship between Xiao Hong and Zhou Shuren, she just took some quiet and slow clips to map. There is a clip where Zhou Shuren said to Xiao Hong that they are all sick people. seems to be a sentence without a trace, but there is an undercurrent surging inside.

He was a literary giant of his time, she was a fledgling female writer, but there was a sense of sympathy between the two. I couldn't tell if they were literati or attracted to the opposite sex.

Maybe it's a mystery. At least in Anhua Hui's films, she doesn't try to unravel the mystery. We can only speculate and chew secretly!"