When he knew that the topic of the debate was "whether to judge heroes by success or failure", Zhu Quan knew that he was already sure of victory.

Not to mention anything else, the mouth cannon of the opposing Yuan Ding boss in the previous life can be called a "nuclear bomb", and the other party who blew it up was dizzy, and he had no power to parry it at all.

Although Zhu Quan thinks that he is not very good at debate, he still has more than enough to inherit and carry forward the will of Yuan Ding's boss in the parallel world.

The female classmate named Wu Tian was still telling her argument: "... There is not only one value in our time... The notion of a hero based on success or failure is bound to be coordinated and constrained by other values in our society..."

On the Internet, the barrage has been brushed up, and the most is, "The voice is good", "The appearance is suppressed", "I like this girl so much"... And so on, these barrages that have nothing to do with the debate itself.

Of course, there are also barrages that focus on the debate itself:

"What Zhengfang wants to express is that 'success or failure is one of the criteria for heroes', but it is not the only criterion. Based on this, then the right side can win the game. ”

"It's great!"

"What's the problem, doesn't this positive theory just prove that 'you don't need to judge heroes by success or failure'? Because there is simply no way to judge! ”

"Let's see what happens! The opposing side needs to be understood in that way, but as a judge, you can't innate yourself into the point of view, so it is appropriate to develop the theory in this way. ”

"The topic of the times should have the significance of the times, it's so good!"

"Anyway, I think this argument is a bit of a neutral one. There is a saying where it comes from, surrender and lose half? ”

"2333...uh, I guess they also know that their holders are poisonous, so they can only express that I don't deny your point of view, right?"

"That's not right! You can see the debate clearly, okay?! Is the focus of the topic "Heroes by Success or Failure"? No! It's "undesirable"! Then neutrality can prove 'desirable', and the natural victory will be won. Do you want to choose the squareは squarely

D mode? ”

"In terms of the topic, this kind of debate maximizes the interests of the positive side, and this compromise method is not easy to be directly refuted."

...

Wu Tian then elaborated: "... A hero is not a simple person, nor is it a medical beauty hero, nor is it a cold tombstone, it represents a spiritual symbol, a national flag and a national example. The value of heroes based on success or failure is to turn people's pursuit of success into a spiritual pursuit, and to inspire people to be positive and enterprising..."

Zhu Quan listened and memorized, and half of his arguments had already been said, but he still hadn't been able to find a single flaw, as if he had practiced Tai Chi Kung Fu, and directly avoided talking about all the points that might be attacked on the positive side, and was in a neutral position.

If you want to refute his arguments next, you have to refute your own arguments first, which is quite like a thousand-year-old turtle, and you can't escape from the world.

This has a special tactical name in the debate arena called "neutral" play.

In other words, instead of directly refuting the other party's point of view, but integrating the other party's point of view into your own point of view, so that A has B, and B is a branch of A.

Just like if A is correct, B can be correct, and if B is wrong, it does not affect whether A is correct or not.

It's an almost rogue style of play, and if they do, then there is no need to continue the game.

Zhu Quan didn't like this kind of debate, but he still didn't panic, because this situation was already expected.

In the previous three hours of brainstorming, Zhu Quan already had a comprehensive guess about the possible playing style of the yellow team, and now the speech of the first debater Wu Tian is exactly within the range he thought.

Debate is not only to expound one's own point of view, but also to dismantle the other party's point of view, only in this way can we win.

If this point is not reached, then when the judges judge in the end, there will be disagreements, "the public says that the public is reasonable, and the mother-in-law says that the mother-in-law is reasonable", which cannot be perfectly crushed.

For Zhu Quan, victory is not his most important goal, a big victory and hit the heart of the player named Sun Qiang to continue to walk the road of debate, this is what Zhu Quan has to do.

Who made him speak disrespectfully to himself?

At first, Zhu Quan didn't care about the other party's sneering at him, after all, the other party was a real person who came from the audition all the way to the debate, and looked down on the players who came in halfway with the "invitation letter", thinking that they were "related households", which was normal, and Zhu Quan also planned to use the competition to prove his strength.

But when Jiang Feng and others confided to Zhu Quanhe, saying that the reason why Sun Qiang was sarcastic about him was because he grabbed this place, which caused his girlfriend to not be "resurrected" from the losers, and he could not participate in the International College Debate Tournament held in Jiujianwa together.

When Zhu Quan heard that this was the case, the anger in his heart rose suddenly.

Since you and your girlfriend can't go abroad to eat, drink and have fun at public expense, then stay in China obediently and find your girlfriend to comfort each other!

Zhu Quan raised his head and looked at the Wu Tian player who was speaking on the yellow team, and at this time her argument was at the end:

“... The pursuit of success and the encouragement of heroes are the hallmarks of our times and the value orientation that our times need. Heroes of the times, the pursuit of success, the success of the times, need heroes! Thank you! ”

As soon as the words fell, the scene burst into applause.

Then the hostess took control of the scene and said: "Thank you, Wu Tian, let's ask the opposing side to argue Jiang Ge's position on the opposing side, and the time is still three minutes." ”

Jiang Ge, the female classmate who followed Jiang Feng before, stood up and began to say: "The ancients also said that if the name is not right, the word will not go well, and if the word is not good, it will not be successful. Therefore, it is only when things are made clear that we can have a meaningful debate..."

This is the strategy that Zhu Quan, Jiang Feng and others specified when they were preparing, that is, no matter what the Yellow Team's argument is, whether it is a frontal hard shoulder or a neutral fishing, then when expounding, their own side will adopt a blanket attitude of opposing the arguments and statements of the positive side in the first sentence.

Of course, it is not to oppose for the sake of opposition, let alone to oppose verbatim, but to refute it at a high latitude level.

Because the two sides are naturally opposites, they say that "it is desirable to judge heroes by success or failure", then they focus on "desirable", and they naturally have a "geographical" advantage over their own side.

Therefore, the Chinese side should pay more attention to "success or failure" and move the focus of the debate closer to the word "success or failure."

After all, the word "desirable" is too broad, and it is not all true of "can", which gives the Yellow team plenty of leeway to maneuver.

So if you follow the other party, how can your team win this debate?

Therefore, the first step of the argument is to clearly "oppose" everything that the yellow team just said, and this second sentence formally puts forward his own point of view:

"Success or failure is relative to specific goals, achieving is success, failing to achieve failure. However, a hero is a person who can arouse the feelings of sublime in others with the qualities of talent he is exposed to. The so-called 'heroes by success or failure' means that success is a hero, and failure is not a hero. ”

"Therefore, we consider this view undesirable!"

After hearing such arguments, the five people on the judges' table all showed playful shallow smiles.