Sun Qiang, the fourth debater of the yellow team, looked at Zhu Quan, who was sitting on the opposite side of the second debate seat with a smile on his face, and then looked at the three dejected people in his team, and whispered through gritted teeth: "Specially, cheer me up, don't drop the chain for me, we will be invincible if we elaborate according to what we discussed before." ”

"Zheng Zihao, this second argument will be sent back to me, and I will be beaten back!"

It is undeniable that Sun Qiang's strength is the strongest existence among these four people, so he deservedly won the captain's seat, and arranged for Wu Tian, who came from the back door, to argue.

Because for Sun Qiang, the role of a debate is to say what he prepared before the game, as long as he can speak, there is no problem.

As for the big melee after that, just leave it to the other three.

Sun Qiang took advantage of the hostess to control the scene and introduce the second debate, and whispered in the audience to warn the three of them to obey his arrangement.

On the other side, Zhu Quan, Jiang Feng and Yu Lei, the third-debater player, all praised Jiang Ge's speech just now.

"Jiang Ge, your argument just now is simply amazing!"

Jiang Feng turned sideways and said to the place where Jiang Ge was sitting.

"Jiang Ge's gestures, tone, posture, smile, time control, and sense of rhythm of the argument just now all played a 100% effect, and the lawyer Xu was the most appreciative of Jiang Ge's argument among the judges."

Yu Lei then said behind Jiang Feng.

"It's thanks to Zhu Quan's guidance to me, which helped me correct some of the control of rhythm points and make my narration more engaging."

Jiang Ge is a gentle woman, although she studied literature, she majored in international law, and she also hid a charged, belligerent side.

In the lawyer's business, the little sheep that can only "bleat" will be eaten by those "whooping" big bad wolves, and there is no hair left.

"The main thing is that you are talented, you are not bad in the first place, otherwise you would not have completed so much in just a few dozen minutes."

Zhu Quan has always been a person who has a clear love and hate of "people respect me for a foot, and I respect people for a foot", so for Jiang Ge's goodwill, he naturally has to wear a high hat.

Moreover, this is not a "high hat" made out of nothing.

So what is Jiang Ge's speech just now? What's so good?

The argument of the debate should be judged not only by its content, but also by its effect.

Just like what Yu Lei said, whether it is from Jiang Ge's gestures, tone, posture, smile, time control, and sense of rhythm of the argument, by the way, as well as Jiang Ge's natural atmosphere and natural sense of goodwill, there are few that can be matched in the debate circle.

And just now, Jiang Ge showed all this vividly.

What is a good argument?

In short, it is a good argumentative voice, which is to make you close your eyes and hear from beginning to end, neither falling asleep because of boredom and boredom, nor letting you fall asleep because of harshness and showiness;

A good argumentative gesture is to let you understand the ups and downs of the argument, but it will not dominate the audience;

A good argument, everything he does is born for the sake of making arguments and being able to do things.

In other words, the realm of one argument is a state of nothingness.

Just like Jiang Ge just now!

Maybe her thesis was written by the coach or four people, but every word and every word is her soul, every and every laugh is her sincerity, and her more hard work is not in the manuscript, not in the confrontation, but in the most difficult place.

Many laymen, even insiders, don't pay attention to this aspect, just like Sun Qiang thinks, a debate is a manuscript, but in the actual operation process, in fact, it is really, really, really very difficult to do.

For example, take the host of the Spring Festival Gala of National Television every year, it is nothing more than a series of words to say some clichés, for these experienced hosts, they still need to practice for more than a month?

Why do you spend a lot of time doing "ineffective" labor?

In fact, this time is to achieve the most perfect state in all aspects of your tone, intonation, gestures, and demeanor through continuous practice.

One is as perfect as possible, the other is foolish, and the audience is not stupid, the eyes are very sharp, and they can be seen at a glance.

Perfection and goodness are two different concepts, which is why everyone praised Jiang Ge's performance just now.

"Okay, don't be humble both of you, you both have merit." Jiang Fengzai encouraged Zhu Quan again: "Zhu Quan, this second argument depends on you!" ”

Zhu Quan nodded slightly, and his gaze shifted from the first debate on the other side to the second debate.

Zheng Zihao, the second debater of the yellow team, is a graduate student from Chang'an Jiaotong University majoring in railway system, and this is the second time he has entered the final stage of the selection competition.

For the first time, due to the gap in strength, and I didn't get a thigh to fly with myself, I missed the last International College Debate Tournament.

And this second time, he was actually lucky, and he was drawn to a team with Sun Qiang.

Although Sun Qiang is only a sophomore, he is already recognized as a god in the debate circle, and he is also one of the two thighs selected step by step through the audition.

And the other thigh is Jiang Feng!

In order to enter the finals, Zheng Zihao is an unswerving Sun Qiang party and abides by his words as a holy decree.

After clearing his throat, Zheng Zihao got up, stretched out his right index finger and middle finger, made a "2" gesture, and said in a straight voice: "I will first point out the two mistakes made by the other student." ”

Then, Zheng Zihao's right index finger was still erect, and the middle finger was lowered, and he gestured with a "1", and then said: "The first point, logically, "desirable" in our side means that it is desirable, but it is not the same as copying, and "undesirable" means that the other party means that it is not desirable. The other side must argue that this sentence is not worth learning and accepting from any angle or at any level. ”

Finally, he let go of the curved index finger again, juxtaposing with the originally erected index finger, Zheng Zihao posed the word "2" again, and said sharply: "The second point is that the other party regards the 'success or failure of the hero' as a specific method to apply in the practice of real life, but the other party, please don't forget that what we are going to do today is a value judgment, not a factual judgment." ”

It's a bit of a feat!

Zhu Quan heard Zheng Zihao's argument, and half-squinted his eyes and recorded the two rebuttals that the other party had just said on the paper:

First, desirable means desirable, and undesirable refers to undesirable;

Second, it does not make a factual judgment, but only a value judgment.

Cheng went on to impassioned: "On a personal level, the desirability of this value is reflected in his advocacy for success and his encouragement of people to pursue it. Heroes are judged by success or failure, and people are encouraged to pursue all-round personal development in order to achieve the goal of self-improvement and harmony... Being able to get certain incentives and evaluations is the driving force behind progress. ”

The desirability of this value is also reflected in the fact that he has promoted the development of the country, from the small individual to the large country, all pursuing the same principle of advocating success. When the country... The individual needs to succeed because the individual needs self-actualization; The country needs to succeed, because the country needs the country to be rich and the people strong; Our society encourages success because society needs heroic examples. ”

sprinkled a large paragraph, but Zhu Quan's brain was running rapidly in his mind, and he quickly sorted out the points of the other party's argument.

That is, from the personal aspect, advocate the evaluation and encouragement of the "success or failure hero" to the person who reaches the goal, so it can be concluded that the evaluation and encouragement are the source of progress, so the "success or failure hero" can encourage people to pursue the goal of self-improvement, so it is desirable;

Then, from the social aspect, it is desirable to advocate that the "success or failure of heroes" will give the people a common positive belief and thus promote the sustainable development of the country.

Hehe!

It's really crazy!

I actually went around again!

Since you are going to play "Value", then I will give you a good "Value Lesson" next!

As the hostess took control of the scene, the applause gradually became smaller, Zhu Quan smiled, stood up confidently, and said:

"The other side told us from the first to the second argument that their point of view today is only to prove that there is merit and desirability in 'judging heroes by success or failure'. Then there is something desirable, and having desirability means that there is also undesirable and undesirable. If there is merit is desirable, then does the undesirability mean that it is undesirable? ”

"In other words, does the other student also argue our own point of view as a premise when proving your point of view?"

As soon as these words fell, the four members of the yellow team instantly felt as uncomfortable as eating, the kind of green hair oil.