"To be honest, I didn't understand the point of his debate..."?!

What a situation!

Zhu Quan was directly stunned when he saw this sentence.

A professional debater, let's call him a professional, after all, he is also a reserve member who entered the national college debate team with his own strength, and he actually said that he didn't understand the point of debate!

This statement is a bit like "cats don't eat fish, dogs don't eat meat, and Ultraman doesn't fight little monsters", which is absurd.

However, out of a rigorous academic attitude, Zhu Quan did not easily send a WeChat message based on this sentence to respond to Sun Qiang.

Because Sun Qiang still has such a long section behind him, he has no right to speak without investigation, since he said that he didn't understand, then Zhu Quan didn't mind understanding what he didn't understand first, so he explained it to him one by one in his subsequent response.

Zhu Quan used the fingerprint of his right thumb to unlock the mobile phone screen, and what appeared on the interface was the content of the college debate chat group, and the latest news was Sun Qiang's long paragraph:

"I think Zhu Quan's performance in this issue is just an upgraded version of Fu Ershou, and his highlights are only in the way he expresses himself and his oratory skills during the debate, but not in the argument itself."

Zhu Quan disagrees with this, although he mainly starts with gags, but this is just the appearance!

The core of my own debate is quite profound.

Just because there is an element of performance in the narration does not negate that large part of the argument.

Zhu Quan can feel Sun Qiang's deep jealousy and dissatisfaction, arrogance and prejudice towards him from this sentence.

But Zhu Quan didn't care, sneered, and continued to look down.

“... The foreshadowing of the current rhythm and endless jokes made the audience run for votes, but after speaking, these votes could not be retained, and they could not play too decisive role in the final vote... Those audiences are the grass on the wall, when Huang Da Boss said, he ran the ticket in a hurry, and when Zhu Quan said it, he also ran the ticket..."

“... It can be seen that this audience is originally freewheeling, and there is no gradual gradual of their own at all, and the psychological factor of "people following the herd" is too great, so Zhu Quan just took advantage of the backhand..."

Hehe!

Zhu Quan only has these two words to evaluate this.

What does it mean to "take advantage of the back"?

Zhu Quan did not deny that the 100 audience members at the scene had the psychology of "conforming to the herd", but if he really wanted to say that he had the advantage of being a "backhand", he would inevitably look down on what Cai Yijian said when he was defending the three sides in the back!

It is also a demolition argument, the same is a new idea, the same is value, and the logic is also quite meticulous, but it has not been able to pull back many votes for the positive side.

Therefore, the advantage of the "back hand" was not taken advantage of, and the rhetoric of "people conforming to the crowd" was not the most fundamental reason why he won so many votes.

In other words, Sun Qiang was wrong on both points.

Zhu Quan did not doubt that Sun Qiang's debating strength could understand what he said, but through such a few evaluations, he could know that Sun Qiang was judging with colored glasses.

Zhu Quan was patient and continued to look down.

"I feel that the points mentioned by Zhu Quan in this issue are not on such a stage where emotion exceeds rationality, but on the stage of rationality, then after a little thought, you will find that the arguments he expressed are very flawed..."

Seeing this, Zhu Quan smiled contemptuously, he wanted to see how Sun Qiang was.

"Zhu Quan said in the first point of view, 'The best destination of famous paintings is to burn...', so in other words, those permanently lost cultural relics in human history have received the best fate?

There are many more cultural relics destroyed than the existing cultural relics, but the famous things that have been destroyed, the public knows the Old Summer Palace!

If you look at the world, it's a Babylon!

How many of those who are alive can be named?

I'm sure there are a lot of them!

So according to Zhu Quan's point of view, why don't we destroy all the famous paintings now? And then all that people are left is a Old Summer Palace, a Babylon, and that's it. ”

Not... It's quibble, but it's rational enough.

"Then, Zhu Quan said, 'The value of a painting comes from the story behind it, so sacrificing a famous painting to save a cat is the best story...'?!

I'm going to refute that.

A fire, the painting was destroyed for a cat is a story, isn't that a man struggling to save a painting from the fire also a story?

And wouldn't the continued existence of this painting create more stories? ”

It's kind of interesting!

It smells like that!

When Zhu Quan saw this, he also nodded slightly.

Don't blow it or don't black, although this Sun Qiang is black for the sake of black, he is quite powerful.

"Zhu Quan said that the eye of morality... Saving a cat and raising it will guarantee that you will be a good person in the future?! That... Hypothesis... The owner of the cat wants it back or if the cat is dead, then you don't have a moral constraint? ... Is this logic so casual?! ”

Zhu Quan frowned, if he was so hard-witted, then all the words could be refuted with this!

When we go to school and our teachers teach us knowledge, can we guarantee that we will be knowledgeable people in the future?!

This is obviously a paradox!

Do you have to use a few to negate all?!

Sun Qiang still has a lot to say, but Zhu Quan feels that there is no need to continue reading.

Because in addition to the first two points, there is indeed a rebuttal point, but the latter is obviously opposed for the sake of opposition, and it has no value at all.

After a slight glance, I saw that it read:

"'You can't control the cry in the distance, can you control the cry in the distance', the sentence itself is too beautiful, but the question is, all the people who control the cry in the distance must have ignored the cry in the distance?

It is true that there have been people in history who sacrificed others in order to achieve greatness.

But do all those who want to be great recklessly sacrifice others?

Shouldn't we first analyze what we have fulfilled and sacrificed in this context? Ask a question, and then jump to "the sacrifice must be hypocritical and dangerous" without arguments... Isn't that too irresponsible? ”

Hehe!

It's really against for the sake of opposition!

The minority really represents the majority!

In the end, Sun Qiang concluded: "Zhu Quan's big argument is like saying to those audiences, 'You see this person is so good at saying this, but I tell you, what he will say is a liar, you must be more wary of his words!'" ’。 ”

Therefore, this is not a logical speculation, but a "serious and you lose" stance attack of "value is hypocrisy". ”

Sprinkled with joy, Sun Qiang's full of angry words attracted everyone's attention in the college debate group, and the debate team leader inside also saw it, for fear that there would be a contradiction between several team members, so he hurriedly came out to play a round and let everyone discuss this debate topic.

Jiang Feng, Jiang Ge and others also spoke in the group.