When they heard Zhu Quan's question, "What crime did Li Si and that woman commit in this incident", everyone was completely confused by his turn.

Shrimp?

Is it really guilty?

But isn't it just an emotional issue?

Why is it still involved in crime?

This... It's too bad!

Before, because Zhu Quan only replied to the text version, and there was a hint of ridicule in his tone, most of them were unimpressed.

There are even many people who think that the man who asked the question is a trust, and after raising this question, he cooperated with the "law popularization expert Zhang San" to carry out a hype, the purpose is to attract attention and achieve the purpose of attracting fans.

Otherwise, how to explain that under the first Weibo, so many netizens who asked legal questions did not get the flop of this "law popularization expert Zhang San", but only flipped the man's cards?

In short, netizens who like "conspiracy theories" can be said to have a big brain and an extremely rich imagination.

In line with the idea of "cooperating with acting" and finally "exposing the truth", many netizens posted barrages when they watched the video here:

"Teacher Zhang San, this friend of yours Li Si boldly pursues love, that's right! I mean there is no fault in the legal sense! ”

"I don't think it's morally wrong, because your friend Li Si is used to break through the world's vision, break free from narrow thinking, pursue the freedom of love, and strive for true liberation, which is an example of the new era!"

"That friend of yours, Li Si, is too wronged!"

"That's it, that's it! Teacher Zhang San, you also said that your friend Li Si has asked the woman for a divorce, and he is with him, but he hasn't had time to handle it yet! If you want to blame, you can only blame the time for being too rushed! ”

"The matter of asking for a divorce can be seen that Li Si has love for the woman, and it is true love! Shouldn't we applaud true love? ”

"I think the woman's husband... No, the person who should be called 'in name only' is the criminal! Li Sida was hospitalized, this has to be detained, right?! ”

"Li Si is so pitiful! Not to mention being beaten and locked up, he was also ridiculed by his friend Zhang San, as a case! ”

"Tell me, what crime have you committed? Anyway, I support Li Si's innocence myself, and those who agree with it please line up in the back! ”

"Platoon support!"

"Platoon support!"

"Platoon support!"

...

The man who asked the question also saw the barrage support of all netizens, and also saw Zhu Quan's experience with his friend Li Si, and then glanced at the woman who was asleep, and his heart couldn't help but soften, and then tightened.

Couldn't I have such a good woman?

Could it be that her husband, who was not capable of satisfying her, would dare to do it with herself?

The man was puzzled, he felt that Li Si in this story was very similar to him, and couldn't help but empathize with him.

After Zhu Quan successfully released the video, he also paid attention to the comments and opinions of netizens on his first video of popularizing the law.

When they saw that they asked the question of what was the sin, the reaction of the crowd was actually one-sided support for the man's approach, firmly believing that the man was not guilty, and some people even said that it was a "role model"!

What a "role model"!

Zhu Quan immediately felt quite helpless when he saw this, and he also understood what a correct decision he made to inherit the mantle of Luo Yangyu in his previous life.

The Chinese country of this world is very much in need of a popular law video like itself!

What the hell is a bunch of legal blindness!

And it is a group of young and legally illiterate, and the future of Huaguo belongs to them!

Because this is on Weibo, it is the main battlefield of young people.

And if even this group of young people who have received basic education are so ignorant and unvirtuous, one can imagine how terrible the thinking of the remaining large part of those who have not received a good education is.

Or, what's even more terrifying is that because of the wrong direction of education, these young people have the idea of flattering and accepting dross?!

Zhu Quan couldn't help but shiver.

It is also thanks to the constraints of China's 5,000-year-old excellent and rich traditional culture, and it is also fortunate that the things of "losers", "selling ancestors", and "digging up the foot of the wall" have been done in a mess, otherwise I don't know what it will become.

Zhu Quan patted his chest very happily and continued to see how netizens reacted to the following video.

After a pause of three seconds, "Zhang San" in the video gave everyone enough time to react and think, and said sharply:

"Yes, although my friend Li Si has a very good relationship with me, he is like a person, but the law is not merciful, and I have to say that he has broken the law. In this story, Li Si committed the following crimes:

The first crime is based on Article 259 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China, which stipulates that a person who clearly knows that he is the spouse of a serviceman on active duty and cohabits or marries him shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention.

Some people may wonder that in this case, Li Si and the woman did not live together or marry, but only maintained an improper relationship for a long time, which does not meet the sentencing of this law.

Don't rush, friends.

Here we have to mention a judicial interpretation - according to the interpretation in the Notice of the Supreme People's Court (Fa (Yan) Fa [1985] No. 16) issued by the Supreme People's Court on July 18, 1985 issued by the Supreme People's Court at all levels of local people's courts, military courts at all levels, and railway transport courts at all levels across the country:

Maintaining an illicit relationship for a long time is also a type of sabotage of military marriage.

It may be because the crime of sabotaging military marriages is relatively "unpopular", and there are very few related cases, and many people do not know that there is such a judicial interpretation, which has caused the saying that "maintaining an improper relationship for a long time is not a crime" on the Internet to spread widely and mislead many netizens. ”

Zhu Quan did not stop after saying the first charge of his friend Li Si, and continued:

"The second crime invokes Article 17 of the Property Law of the People's Republic of China, the crime of property fraud, that is, the use of various methods to induce a married person to give away high-value money, including but not limited to a large category of high-value items, patents, etc., thereby causing huge economic losses to the spouse of a married person. where the amount is less than 100,000 RMB, a sentence of up to two years imprisonment or short-term detention is to be given; The amount is between 100,000 and 500,000...

Think about how much ill-gotten money my friend Li Si has obtained. ”

"The third charge..."Zhu Quan made an "OK" gesture with his hand and continued:

Citing Article 13, paragraph 1 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China: "The State shall protect the ownership of citizens' lawful income, savings, houses and other lawful property." and Article 75 of the General Principles of the Civil Law... Article 39 of the "Marriage Law" and Article 199 of the "Property Law" stipulate that Li Si's improper relationship to induce the other party's wife to divorce and thus divide the other party's property can be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than 10 years or criminal detention. ”

Zhu Quan didn't stop in one breath, and directly listed all the three charges of his friend Li Si, citing scriptures and classics, and the evidence was detailed, which made all netizens stunned and exclaimed Gao Neng.

Those who have done good things have found all the legal provisions that Zhu Quan said for verification.

Before all netizens could react from their surprise, Zhu Quan, Zhang San in the video, spoke again:

"Do you know, then, what sin that woman has committed?"