"I'll give him a full score for this conclusion!"

"Cow beep, cow beep! I can't say anything to praise except cow beep! I'm a die-hard fan of Zhu Quan's "Ollie" little brother! ”

"Is the literary literacy upstairs worthy of being a die-hard fan of Zhu Quan's little brother? Please come back after learning Chinese culture well! ”

"Hey, hey, just study hard! This is said as if you are not worthy of being a fan of Zhu Quan without cultural literacy! That's not right! Isn't this recruiting for Zhu Quan's little brother? ”

"That's it!"

"Let's remember the concluding remarks of Zhu Quan, the fourth debater of the Chinese team in the finals of the 2019 College Debate Tournament! This will definitely be a milestone for the Chinese Debate Competition. ”

"That's... Is there any big guy who can help explain? I can only say 666 to the argument just now! ”

"Let me explain the subtleties of this argument!

This pinnacle argument is a masterpiece of Chinese debate at all levels.

From a literal point of view, its attacks are concise and to the point;

From an ideological point of view, his analysis of the proposition of human nature and evil is deeply divided, and the wonderful pen of Shenghua writes profound philosophical thoughts;

From a structural point of view, the proportion of rebuttal, argument and sublimation is appropriate, and the aggressiveness and rationality are perfectly combined;

From the logical level, its arguments are rigorous and in-depth;

In terms of argumentative style, it is elegant and elegant, and it is lightweighted;

From the perspective of inheritance, it is destined to be sung and sighed by later debaters, and it will be fun again and again;

This is a poetic and bold ending. ”

"Hold the grass, there is a big guy upstairs! This analysis is too powerful! I don't know how to do it! It's even better! Wow-haha..."

"It's very familiar to look at an ID! My name is Jiang Jianchang? Jiang Jianchang... Isn't he the MVP of the first class in 1993? ”

"What MVP?"

"Hold the grass! I just checked it on the Internet, and indeed, the best debater in the first college debate tournament that year was Jiang Jianchang! At that time, it was still a university team. Big Guy Jiang is the fourth debater of Shuangdan University! He was also the MVP of the year! ”

"Could it be the host of the "Best Brain" program on Lychee Channel?"

"Welcome big guy!"

"I didn't expect the big guy to still pay attention to the college debate tournament!"

...

"I didn't expect anyone to remember me! (smiley)"

"Big guy, big guy! Is the championship of our Huaguo team stable this time? ”

"It's definitely stable! Unless the old depression doesn't even want to have a face, then there will be no more countries and regions to compete, and our Huaguo will directly throw them off and go it alone! ”

"Jiang Jianchang is mighty!"

"Mighty!"

"Congratulations in advance to the Chinese team for winning the championship!"

...

The remarks of Jiang Jianchang, the startling boss on a certain platform, instantly spread from this platform, and the Chinese people still believe in this evaluation of this ancient debate god.

The crowd has already begun to celebrate the arrival of the Chinese team championship in advance.

Through these analyses, the audience also saw the characteristics of a good closing argument, that is, "the seductive beauty of content", "the artistic beauty of form", "the logical beauty of argumentation", "the harmonious beauty of argumentation" and "the beauty of the debater's demeanor".

Jiang Jianchang, as the leader of the Huaguo team, sat in the rest room of the Huaguo team in the background, watching the live broadcast of the scene, and watching the reactions of the domestic audience with his mobile phone, and he was very relieved.

As the person who opened the road to Huaguo's hegemony in the college debate tournament, he has a very deep affection for the college debate tournament.

Sixteen years ago, he failed to win the championship for five consecutive years, always hated the finals, and even in the semifinals, Jiang Jianchang was appointed as the leader and coach of the Chinese national team.

For this reason, Lizhitai also moved the recording time of "The Best Brain" to the second half of the year, so as to support Jiang Jianchang's decision.

Sure enough, the big guy came out, one top 10,000.

In the next two editions, they won the championship.

And now, with Zhu Quan's speech, the possibility of three consecutive championships is almost 100%.

With only an hour to search for information and discuss, Jiang Jianchang knew that it was very important to take the "lead", that is, in the stage of rebuttal, his own rebuttal must be offensive and to the point.

Fortunately, under the performance of the first three debaters, the old depression reduction team was suppressed, and Zhu Quan's final argument won "strategic space".

Because both the opposing and positive debaters have a heavy responsibility, that is, to attack the mistakes made by the opponent throughout the game.

Therefore, in the "old depression reduction debate mode", that is, under the four debaters in turn, the final debater often becomes the key to determining the outcome of the debate.

Whether or not the sword can be pointed to the southeast, turn the tide, and break the enemy with one sword has become a concentrated embodiment of the ability of the debater.

In order to reflect the importance of the "winner and loser", Jiang Jianchang made a surprise move and let Zhu Quan take on the fourth debate for the first time, so that he could devote himself to analyzing the loopholes of the opponent's defense in the first three rounds of speeches, and accumulate for the improvement of the final debate.

Sure enough, Zhu Quan lived up to expectations.

The two attacks made at the beginning of this closing argument can be said to be to the point, in one sentence, although the attack is not much, but the few words show the true character of the best debater.

In this game, there were many mistakes made by the old depression reduction team, but Zhu Quan did not catch them all, but let them go small and catch the big, and caught two real fatal injuries:

First, the concept of the word "this" has always been vague, constantly avoiding, constantly swaying, and timid, sometimes defining "this" as the initial stage of human development, and sometimes defining "this" as the birth of an individual;

Second, logically, there are serious logical problems in the positive theory, which cannot be justified, but only says that "human nature is good" and attributes all kinds of evils to the objective influence of society.

Especially the second mistake that follows, which is obviously difficult for the masses to accept.

Because it's easy to come up with a dilemma:

If society is objective, it is equivalent to equating society with the material environment, and the evil of the material environment is impossible to talk about.

So apart from the subjective factors of human beings, how can society have an impact on human nature and make people who are good do evil;

If society is not objective, then it is recognized that society is a collection of relationships between people, and acknowledging the evil of society is equivalent to admitting the evil of man.

If society is not evil, then under the effect of such a non-evil collection, how non-evil human nature behaves evil becomes another contradiction;

In the free debate, these two points became the focus of the Chinese team's firepower, and the logical errors of the old depression reduction team were pointed out by the Chinese team five times.

In this case, Zhu Quan's statement achieves the greatest effect with the most simple pen and ink.

It can be said that a sword seals the throat.