Zhu Quan began to study this interview record, picked up the materials, and cooperated with the video of Chai Jing'er's interview with Academician Ding playing on the computer in front of him, and drew the key points of the record in circles on it.

I have to say that during this half-hour-long interview, Academician Ding vividly demonstrated the noble qualities of Chinese scientists' meticulous thinking, rigorous logic, and the ability to safeguard national interests to the fullest.

In the video, Academician Ding Zhongli is upright and upright all his life, and he is completely a fan of him.

Sure enough, BRAINY, IS, NEW, SEXY! (Wisdom is the new trend of sexy!) ）

Chai Jinger, as a star host, is of course a lot higher than ordinary people in all aspects.

Throughout the interview, Chai Jinger interviewed Academician Ding Zhongli with literary style, pride and conceit, debate skills, cleverness and cunning, and as a result, in the face of Academician Ding's absolute strength, she exposed the essence of "bronze and copper" from all aspects.

Zhu Quan very seriously experienced the expressions and micro-expressions of the two during the interview, "gold" and "bronze", which can be known at a glance.

Zhu Quan feels quite unreasonable, thinking that back then, Chai Jinger also evolved from the grassroots to a star host in China, doing a lot of interviews, publishing a lot of books, and hosting a lot of programs.

She is very good, Zhu Quan was also moved by her five-minute speech, and also thought that the book "Seeing" written by her was great.

Especially when she saw the cover photo of Chai Jing'er facing the elderly and children with cleanliness and care in her eyes, Zhu Quan had a good impression of this woman in her heart.

However, this kind of goodwill disappeared after seeing "Under the Sky" and this interview with Academician Ding Zhongli Ding.

Because from this, Zhu Quan can no longer see the clear and compassionate eyes.

In this half-hour video, Zhu Quan took a look at the performance of the two in several rounds of confrontation:

In the first round, there was a debate on "China has too many people, so it should emit less";

In the second round, it was "according to the country. or by head";

In the third round, the debate was held on "China's development and the interests of all mankind".

In these three rounds of competition, Chai Jing'er was impure in thought, and was speechless by Academician Ding's argument, and finally ended up embarrassed and ended the interview.

In connection with what happened at the previous Copenhagen World Climate Conference, Zhu Quan has roughly sorted out the context.

The Copenhagen World Climate Conference is the 15th Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the 5th Conference of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol, also known as the Copenhagen United Nations Climate Change Conference, which was held in Copenhagen, the capital of Denmark, from June 17 to 28, 2019.

At this meeting, the international community needs to agree on the following four points:

First, what are the greenhouse gas emission reductions in industrialized countries?

Second, how should major developing countries like China and East India control their greenhouse gas emissions?

Third, how to finance developing countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and adapt to the impacts of climate change?

Fourth, how is this money managed?

At the meeting, the Chinese delegates were domineering and directly angrily denounced the Western countries led by the lighthouse countries, without showing any mercy:

“... It's been more than 20 years since you talked about emission reduction, have you done it?

No!

According to the official statistics of the United Nations, the carbon emissions of your developed countries have doubled to quadrupled in the past 20 years, and some have even increased by more than 260 percent!

You said to provide technology and funding, did you provide it?

No!

It is difficult for us developing countries everywhere, and the equipment exported to our developing countries is inflated!

The last sentence, we have done all of the above, what qualifications do you have to tell me these truths?! ”

As soon as these words came out, all the developing countries present burst into thunderous applause, while those developed countries in the West, which claim to be the beacons of mankind, lost face.

Zhu Quan watched the process of the conference on the sidelines of the college debate competition, because it was a hot event, and it is likely that the debate competition will have relevant debate topics.

What I didn't expect was that the debate competition was not released, but the first program after returning to China was released.

From this interview, Zhu Quan has already judged the conspiracy behind the Copenhagen conference:

First of all, let's sort out what this ICPP is.

ICPP is a research institute funded by the lighthouse nation Wall Street and an intergovernmental panel on climate change under the name of the United Nations.

It sounds like a very authoritative organization, after all, it is an association under the name of the United Nations.

But in reality, however, it is only a notification body for the results of scientific research.

Yes, it's not even a research institution!

So, where does the data it publishes come from?

Academician Ding Zhongli gave the answer.

He said, "... It will not investigate the changes in the temperature and cooling of the geological history period, it is calculated by computer, and after the calculation, a conclusion is made:

If the temperature rises by two degrees, how many species will die.

This is what a research team in the United Kingdom did.

It is strange that this conclusion, which has not yet been proven by most scientists, immediately became popular..."

The full name of the "research group in the United Kingdom" mentioned by Academician Ding here is "Climate Research Centre of the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom".

This is a scientific institute that studies the data and disseminates it to the world by the ICPP.

Why is it that "this conclusion is immediately popular"?

Because the organization behind it manipulates the world's mainstream media.

However, the real result of the study is that the global temperature has fallen since 1981, not the increase in temperature as claimed by the international mainstream media.

So, digging here, in fact, the truth of the matter is almost the same.

To sum up, the full playbook of conspiracy theories at the 2019 Copenhagen climate conference looks like this:

Before the 2019 Copenhagen Conference, Wall Street Capital invested in climate disaster blockbusters such as "The Day After Tomorrow" and "2012" through remote control of media public opinion, creating public awareness of "global warming" on a global scale.

Under the bombardment of domestic and foreign media public opinion and Hollywood blockbusters, and in the audience's basic acceptance of the concept of "global warming" and the formation of a general understanding, Wall Street capital further pursued and consolidated the victory, created an authoritative academic scam of "global warming", and funded the establishment of a lofty-sounding "research institute" - the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ICPP).

As a result, the ICPP was shaped into an authoritative publishing body for scientific results, with "scientific results" coming from a "Centre for Climate Research, University of East Anglia, England".

The center uses the money given by Wall Street to recruit a group of scientists from all over the world to form a so-called "mainstream" scientific community, falsify and aggregate data, and create a global big lie to achieve the goals and results desired by Wall Street capital groups.

And what is the purpose and outcome that Wall Street wants?

The first is to deprive developing countries and third world countries of their right to development through the so-called "carbon emission rights", stop the process of industrialization that hinders them, and make developing countries and third world countries forever become the objects of exploitation and oppression by Western developed countries.

The second is that once the total carbon emissions are confirmed, "carbon emission rights" will become a rare and scarce resource, and you must buy them if you want to.

The key point, where to buy?

Wall Street Emissions Exchange.

In this way, Wall Street will not only be able to blatantly sell the world a virtual resource of carbon credits for industrial production.

It is also possible to condemn the countries and people around the world who work honestly from a moral perspective for "destroying the environment" and "polluting the earth".

And they can get nothing for nothing, and they will always plunder and rule the world.

He made a/son and set up an archway.

A real shamelessness to the extreme.

This is why the fact of "global cooling" has been changed to "global warming" for political purposes.