This book is also going to be on the shelves.

Speaking of me, old book friends are very familiar with me, and new book friends may have heard of me, a crow professional.

Night crows, silver crows, and crows, I am all writing crows.

Tsar's book, the basic type of the protagonist's inhuman form is a bird dragon.

I remember that at first, when I wrote about the Night Raven, some people thought that the setting of my Night Raven saying that the dragons had fled from the Glory World (the early world of the Night Raven) was very boring, and the dragons casually crushed your broken birds, and one AOE burned a large area.

I was quite surprised at the time, the dragon didn't actually exist, the bird actually existed, and it was really big in history.

The largest flying creature, although not birds, but the pterosaur sister branch of the dinosaur, from the evolutionary history, birds were originally a member of the main dragon family, or from the largest land animal body size of the dinosaur family evolved from a member, and later came to the top, in the competition with the pterosaur, gradually occupied a small ecological niche, step by step, eliminated the pterosaur.

That is, birds have completely degraded their claws and gums, and then take the route of large-scale, which is more difficult than other creatures.

If we go back from the anti-bird that has not degenerated its claws and gums, I wonder what will happen to the evolutionary history.

Designing fantasy creatures based on birds, pterosaurs, and dinosaurs that have existed in real life is why can't it be better than "dragons"?

It's all humanistic creations, why can't they be stronger than you, why should the fantasy creatures that killed the prototype of the bird must be weaker than the dragon?

However, after thinking about it in the end, forget it, after all, people have this kind of thought, probably because of the inertia of various works in reality.

Some people say that your big head is determined by the buttocks, because you like crows, so they say so, dragons are strong.

Yes, it's true that I prefer all kinds of birds to "dragons" because of crows, but to be reasonable, I shouldn't be the first to decide the position of the head with the ass, right?

Don't say "almost".

From the evolution of folk mythology and the direction of social psychology, a rough analysis shows that most of the survival of birds in modern times, except for eagles, can be bullied by humans, and they will leave an impression in the subconscious that "birds are weak" and "weak with feathers".

And "dragon", in many people's concepts, because of the vicious image of various large reptiles, and even the impression of dinosaurs, the brothers and sisters of the bird family, also left a general impression of "the power of long scales" to this group of people.

Eventually, it is combined into "the strength of long scales and the weakness of long feathers".

For example, once you use words such as "crocodile", "shark" and "elephant", you will subconsciously have the impression that they are "big" and "fierce", and from the perspective of communication, cognition, and experience, this is one of the formation mechanisms of human memory and experience.

It's a subtle process.

If I go to fight with people, what kind of crows in fantasy works, why can't fantasy birds be stronger than dragons, but stupid operations.

If you have to fight fantasy beasts, in the end, it is still a matter of the author fighting, and in the end, it is not about stacking boxes, going through all kinds of bells and whistles, and the grand setting of stream of consciousness.

For example, the hierarchical setting in my book of crows, what thoughts, what realities, phenomena, effects, laws, truths, rules, and finally elevate them to concepts, without any entity, without any substantial foundation support, and can penetrate cognition to distort and change things at the real level.

This set is inspired by materialist dialectics (presumably, it is so old that I can't remember where the inspiration was).

What is the fourth wall, the concept, the setting that rises to the narrative layer at every turn sounds awesome, but in the end, it's not a matter of the author fighting?

Of course, there is a basis for understanding this thing, and I don't read all kinds of books and materials on communication psychology and sociology in vain, just like the Internet scolding war, after simplifying it across the board, the conclusion is still who has the most supporters and who is awesome.

Old book friends who read Night Raven probably know that, like many new authors, when they first wrote a book, they more or less had the idea of "my boss, the second of God", and always felt that others were not as good as me when they wrote books, and the readers' opinions were different from mine, so I went up directly to talk to the other side, and those things that came out were completely different from those in the book, and even went up directly to scold you for not reading it, and spraying when you opened your mouth?

But, now, it's long been different.

Squirting with others can only make you angry, make yourself feel bad, and even make yourself physically angry, what's the point, what's the benefit?

Able to articulate the "real situation" so that other readers are not misled?

Think too much.

It's been a long time since I've read a novel, and if I think about it, even if it's me, it's a common thing to read books at a glance and ten lines.

I don't like direct comments, but I've seen a lot of amazing readers with ten lines at a glance + memory loss, swearing to say a sentence, and it's ridiculously wrong, not to mention that as long as you turn back a page, even if the next sentence is explained, but people are still in a hurry to express their opinions.

Even if it's ridiculously wrong.

Later, after experiencing the epidemic again, and watching the Internet scolding war again and again, I suddenly realized that sometimes, when some people go online, when he sprays books, he really doesn't necessarily think that there is something wrong with your book, it may be that he is in a bad mood and sprays when he is unhappy.

Maybe he will come back at another time, and he won't spray the kind.

There are so many things that are emotionally involved.

There are also people who have no opinion on you, and they are not sure if they are wrong, but as long as they are in line with people and quarrel, they will support their uncertain views because of the reverse effect and sunk costs, and even become firm (I have personally experienced this).

I've seen a lot, I've thought about it a lot, and because the grades of the books are not good, I don't care how much money the books can make me, and the overtime pay of several books over the years is not as high as a few months.

In the case of no interests, it is even more Buddha, and it completely becomes a hobby to write books.

One of the things I remember most clearly is that when I said that I was "interested in writing books, I don't know how to be a eunuch", a book friend said, "If you are interested in writing books, isn't it easier to be a eunuch?"

It seems like a common word, right? It dawned on me at that time.

Why do you deliberately engage in any plot ups and downs? Why do you want to set up any links in order to be "engaging"?

Just write what you want to write, just plain and long-winded, I can write my favorite crows, just write my brain holes.

It's okay if readers don't like it, it's normal.

There is no book that everyone likes, and my bland way of writing will sift out a large number of readers.

But it doesn't matter, Buddhism, salted fish, after finding out the problem, it will be even more salty, and I will resign directly from traveling, and I can't run anymore, so I will find a small place to stay and write my book slowly.

So, by now, everyone can see what kind of style I write books.

I've seen comments such as self-esteem, looking down on readers, don't write books if you can't write, Ah Q spirit, sweating soybeans, and dying quickly.

It's not a big deal, emotionally, you can say anything, and no one stipulates that you have to be peaceful when talking to you.

Sometimes, I am also emotional, and once when I encountered a vicious comment, I even wanted to say, you leave your address, I will go to your house, die in front of your house, take a knife to kill myself and then put the knife in your hand.

At that time, I felt that I was going to die anyway, and it would not be a loss to drag a person I didn't like to go to prison.

In the end, the mood went down, and this thought faded.

But to remember how terrible it is to remember this sudden thought.

Emotions are a scary thing.

Hawkers,I've written a lot of personal things at length.,It's useless.,At most, it's to advise all book friends.,When you encounter some big things.,Don't make a decision immediately.,Wait to calm down.,Then you want to do it.,Otherwise, it's easy to regret.,Sometimes it's too late to regret.。

As for my book, I still repeat what I said before, in a word, you don't need to give me a reward, if you subscribe, book friends who are willing to support me and are too lazy to change software, you subscribe, I can only say thank you for your support, let you break the bank.

If you think it costs too much to read a novel, you can also read it if you go to see the "free genuine", and I also support it.

In the final analysis, A takes most of A's earnings from B, then raises the price, and harvests more money from C, and then passes on the contradiction, saying that the price is reasonable, and then saying that C is unwilling to pay B for genuine.

There are more opaque things such as yin and yang contracts, and the old routine of capital is numb.

There's no need to quarrel over whether to see or not to see the "free genuine", both sides are in a lost mood when they quarrel, and in the end, the biggest benefit stands on the side with an innocent face and nothing happens, then it's really ironic, and it's treated as a monkey.

If it is another author, the reader does not subscribe, the capital is lost, and the author is also lost, but we also made it clear at the beginning that we don't care about the amount of income and are interested in writing books.

This book, read it if you want to, and chat with each other when you have the opportunity.

I think this is not good, and if you don't want to read it, it's okay, just delete the book, it's normal to think it's not good-looking, but you can come back and shop when you have time, and it's okay to be a small chat group, just don't quarrel, and it's not a loss to break up with us peacefully, right?

Seriously, it's not me who blows, my two taels of meat are still good (touching the stubble and throwing .jpg flattering eyes)

Well, the update continues, and after nine o'clock in the evening, there should be no update, and before that, it may be updated at any time (current code.jpg