The blood dragons on land, in the form of existence, should be said to be closer to "fungi".

It is well known that algae, fungi and animals are more closely related to plants than to plants.

Again, the boundary between the macro level and the micro level is a model lake.

Taking human beings as an example, they can be distinguished into many different functional organs by functional differentiation and organ and system distinction.

nervous system, digestive system, locomotor system, respiratory system, endocrine system, circulatory system, etc......

And each of these systems can continue to be subdivided.

So, the question is, which one should be the "consciousness" and "self" of human beings? Or which one is the core?

If you could choose more than one, most people would choose the nervous system and endocrine system.

The former is a biological structure that is directly related to memory, consciousness, reason, instinct, etc., in various senses, while the endocrine system is a biological structure that affects emotions and instincts.

So, what about subdividing again?

Subdivide the nervous system and the endocrine system again, and continue to choose the "core"?

Even if you are a living person, you will have a kind of labor-saving thinking of "simplifying thinking", which is a long-term evolutionary thinking structure that has survived because of energy saving, needless to say.

People tend to feel that their sense of personality is something constant and unchanging.

Many people don't realize that their "personality" changes when something that doesn't seem to be very important changes happens.

For example, after an organ is replaced, there will be a slight change in emotional personality.

Even, there is no need to really change the organs, just tell him, deceive him, say that his organs are replaced, there will be a change in personality, and the whole person will show a "different personality".

Because of encountering some big and small things, or knowing certain things, the habits of dealing with people will change.

There is no accurate and precise quantification of how much has changed and how much has changed.

It's often a kind of feeling like a model, and in this case, it's often "I think" that is more important than "calculated".

As long as it does not meet the criteria of "external interference" and does not interrupt the "continuity" of "me", people tend to ignore this change and think that they "have not changed" and that "me" is still "me".

To describe it in a simple and crude conclusion, this kind of underlying logic based on "invasion" and "defense", which originates from the basic instinct of the cell to invade and defend against foreign objects, often becomes the biggest loophole.

"What I agree with", "I take the initiative", what I can accept on the subjective level, can become a part of "me".

The bottom layer of the logic of human thinking is closely related to evolution.

This view of evolutionary psychology, although people will instinctively interpret it as -

"All psychological changes are brought about by evolution"

"All mental activity is genetically determined"

However, the earth will not make the mistake of distorting the viewpoint, setting up a target that is very different from the original viewpoint, and going to the void to shoot the target.

After all, this view is outrageous than-

….

"Because the computer is an electronic digital signal, the underlying framework system is built by electronic digital signals, with its own operating system and logic framework, and the underlying rules."

"So, a computer is artificial intelligence, and humans operate computers to do their work, but in fact, they only work on their own, and there is no human participation at all."

However, although there are many "because-so" that I don't know how to put together, this is not the point.

Just like the analogy used by the earth line, there is no precise quantitative standard judgment, and the thinking logic of many creatures is model.

Without a large enough and clear difference, people will be skewed in some judgments.

The reason why the earth bank is studying this is because...

.... Anaesthetic.

When a foreign object invades, pain perception is the most familiar type of basic warning feedback.

However, there are many ways to counter this warning.

The release of anesthetics, which are substances that target pain and temporarily eliminate the sensation of pain, is also a counter-alert function that many parasites have.

Expanding the scope of anesthetics, theoretically, all methods and means to eliminate rejection can be regarded as anesthesia.

Stunting is also a form of physical anesthesia.

Blood dragons, the most prominent ability, is this aspect.

The ability to cause the consciousness of the target to go crazy and be controlled by itself to a certain extent, has evolved before the earth.

Treat allies as enemies - Increase aggression and expand the range of "invasions".

Treats enemies as allies - Reduces aggression and reduces the detection range of "invasions".

In theory, yes.

In practice, it's not that easy to deal with.

It's not that you can't do it yourself.

But the blood dragons can't do it.

Dixing himself has the time, energy, and patience to go around and edit carefully, but the blood dragons don't say whether they have this knowledge or not, and even if they do, they won't necessarily do it.

The only way is to be "modular" and "triggered".

When you identify certain iconic genes, you cut them out and inject the entire section of the gene you carry.

How to inject? Modularly inject all the genes?

This method is undoubtedly a stupid solution.

Indeed, generally speaking, the division and replication of a cell after the initial stage is basically the division of the cell after division.

It is basically impossible to replace the cells of the whole body without injecting them one by one.

The previously mentioned "Ship of Theseus".

The cells in an organism have an apoptosis period, and they do not accompany the organism from birth to end.

Replacement of blood vessels, in fact, should be called "replacement of hematopoietic cells".

The main goal of the parasitism and symbiosis of the blood dragon is to replace the corresponding tissues and organs of the cells that are stem cells.

Blood is an important transportation network that can flow through the whole body and all cells.

The "living transformation" required by the ground is to transport the modified cells, which are the basal stem cells, to all parts of the body through the vascular network as a pathway.

Of course, you don't have to be in such a hurry.

It is only necessary to replace the target germ cells, starting with the next generation.

Replacing tens of trillions of cells is a big project, but only replacing sperm cells and egg cells is a relatively small amount of work.

However, the choice of the local bank is two-pronged.

Those who live must also be transformed.

When the host loses its rejection response, the blood dragons, as "parasites" or "symbionts", have to perform the work of protecting the host.

However, it doesn't require much protection.

When the host's resistance decreases and pieces of cells and tissues die, it is just when the blood dragons replace new cells.

In terms of performance, it is probably that after a serious illness, he has become stronger?

After most of the cells in the body have been replaced, the task of the blood dragons is basically completed.

The host is alive and stronger, and the memories and consciousness have changed, but not completely.

The goal of the Earth Bank has also been achieved, injecting the genes that need to be stored and backed up into them, making them a living gene storehouse.

Everybody's happy, aren't they?

ps: The parasite won twice, and the ground line only won once, win-win, win-win (stall hands)

South African giants

: wap.. com, you can read it anytime, anywhere....