Some readers said that they were not satisfied with the recent article, and there were suggestions and opinions from all sides, and there were even many opinions on the author's choice of words and sentences.

Maybe the book has achieved some good results, but I'm still the new author, and I don't have the mentality of indifference at all.

As for everyone's comments, I still care as much as ever.

So under these comments, I admit that the mentality has taken a lot of impact over this period of time.

Before I wrote about internal affairs, I thought that some readers would have opinions, and I also thought that some readers would be lost, after all, internal affairs are indeed less attractive than war.

It's just that for an author, I think that if a historical essay does not have a corresponding chapter on internal affairs, it should be considered incomplete, or regrettable.

Many readers have also suggested that I can follow the current trend and write about reforming military academies, setting up a general staff, and copying all the political, economic, and cultural reforms of later generations, so that perhaps domestic affairs will not be so boring.

For example, the development of black technology such as making guns and cannons, imperial examination reform, etc.

After all, the starting point now is not the starting point of 10 years ago.

Many readers don't care what the political system in line with the social productive forces in the Han Dynasty was, nor do they want to care why the wealthy families were able to entrench themselves in the place, they just want to see very handsome and eye-catching reform chapters, rather than relatively real but boring internal affairs chapters.

But I really can't write about it.

The reason why I wrote a book in the first place was that I didn't like historical texts that were too detached from reality, and I didn't want to go against my original intention of writing books.

In fact, it is very simple for me to write like this, because I can grab a lot of this at the starting point, and I can just click on one article and modify some content casually.

It's convenient and hassle-free, and I don't need to buy a lot of information to look up.

It's just that I personally think that if the author of a chapter does not have his own independent ideas, it is water in the true sense, and it is also irresponsible to the reader to the greatest extent.

Saying this, I just want to tell you the author's real thoughts.

I know that at the end of the day, I'm useless and can't write an article that will be enjoyed by all readers.

Looking at those comments, looking at the subscriptions that are far worse than they were at the beginning, I feel that it is time for me to adjust my mentality.

Because I have even made some readers dissatisfied with the words and sentences I have made now, which is tantamount to fundamentally denying all recent chapters, so what kind of mentality do I have to code words?

I'm going to keep writing according to my outline, but I'm really going to have to adjust my mindset.

Thank you to those who have supported this book, even if you may have left.

I also sincerely say sorry to the readers who have been reading it recently, and I'm sorry.

The author of the fungus worshipped.