Testimonials at the end of the volume
It's the end of another volume.,It's the first time I've written this kind of volume that is considered a leadless.。
I knew before I wrote it that my grades would not be good, but this volume must be written, so I wrote this volume with the risk of the book's grades collapsing, but I didn't expect the results to be better than the Three Kingdoms, which was unexpected.
Why was this volume written?
I just want to say one thing, the difference in this world is because of Luo's, without Luo's, it should be rotten or rotten, no one can change it, I'm just so pessimistic, and I've been reading the comments, but I don't reply, because it's not necessary.
I believe that the more people know about history, the higher the recognition of Lowe's existence, because history is so dark that I can hardly see the light, and can only imagine a beam of light.
I wrote this book until now, sometimes Calvin is very depressed, not because of grades, but because I know a lot of real history, but I can't write because I know that it is wrong to write negative things in the book, and I should write about the shining points of our ancestors.
I still insist on writing flashpoints, in fact, there are many things that don't need to be reminded of me, I know that a person who writes history, and it is a more traditional history, it is impossible not to turn over history books, but not everything can be written, and it is necessary to take care of the feelings of readers, and readers spend money to read books not to see their idols being scolded.
Moreover, my evaluation of historical figures has always used the horizontal comparison method, that is, how he compares with his contemporaries, because the evaluation of historical figures cannot be divorced from the times.
Why do I have such a high opinion of Zhou Gongdan, because in his time, he was really great to the point of incomparable, if he lived in the era of Shang Ying, he would still promote historical progress, what if he appeared in modern times?
For example, Emperor Zhaolie Liu Bei, he was able to adhere to benevolence and righteousness in the era when the Three Kingdoms were so bad, if he was a modern person, I believe he would definitely be able to become one of the top ten people who moved.
This is my evaluation method of historical figures, so I am most annoyed by the kind of remarks that say that there were no good people in ancient emperors and generals, and my evaluation is that throwing him back is definitely not as high as Liu Bei's moral bottom line.
By the way, let's also talk about the noisy sentence "The sin is in the present generation, and the merit is in the future", after all, I am about to write Emperor Yang of Sui.
I think that's what I really have a cow for.
This statement is certainly not true.
There are some things I don't dare to say, after all, it's too political, but I can only say that the incident that has been making a lot of noise, and almost everyone will discuss it, and this one has been particularly big recently.
If anyone agrees with this sentence, then go to "take over" to prove it, if you don't even want to "take over", don't say that the sin is in the modern era, after all, when the ancient people can say that the sin is in the modern era, they are basically going to die.
The next volume is the period of Emperor Wen of Sui, so stay tuned.