Seeing that Ronaldo was excited to find the referee theory, Deng Kai immediately stepped forward and grabbed Ronaldo.

In fact, Ronaldo's fall in the penalty area this time can be awarded a penalty.

But again, you have to say that it is not a big problem to judge a fake fall, and the probability of both is equal.

Because Ronaldo exists in a state of "passive confrontation".

This is also the biggest difference between football and basketball.

Every once in a while, the NBA comes up with some epoch-making players.

Four centers.

Jordan.

Four quentiles.

James.

After them, there were two players who changed basketball.

One is Curry.

He brought basketball into the three-point era.

One is Harden.

He brought basketball into the era of porcelain.

Before Harden, the foul making in basketball was actually the same as the foul making in football, that is, it was hard to beat.

Those who make others foul will also have to bear a certain price of confrontation.

In those days, making fouls was a double-edged sword, one of the ways to prove heroes, and it was very golden. But until the end, few stars will choose to use this self-inflicted style of play.

But the Wanci King style of play pioneered by Harden, all kinds of active touching, made foul making a derogatory term.

This style of play seems to conform to the rules, and even take advantage of the rules.

At one point, people did not dare to approach him within a meter radius.

Those shots that weren't shots at all repeatedly earned him free throws and created space to hold the ball.

This style of play is inherently anti-basketball.

It is to overdraw the passion and love of fans for the sport of basketball.

This is also a super booster for the originally fierce basketball to enter the era of "glass basketball".

Since then, as long as there is a breakthrough, there must be a foul, which is a change in degree.

In the past, most of the pitching fouls were only for the hitter, but now when you pitch, if you dare to defend the past, the opponent can almost make a foul, which is a change in purpose and nature.

It seems to be an obviously problematic style of play, but it is in line with the rules, so that the NBA has not been able to think of a way to stifle Harden for a while.

It was only through the introduction of regulations such as "that the foul making action of leaning at an abnormal angle on the defender when shooting is invalid" that the style of touching porcelain was gradually changed.

This makes people think about the question of whether we are playing the rules or basketball.

This is actually related to a problem that many people did not understand in childhood...... Everyone, including the police, knows that the other party is a bad person, but why can't they arrest the other party, and the other party can still get away with it?

This is a classic argument, and it is very difficult to say whether it is right or wrong.

In terms of sports, there are some things that are not written in the rules, not because the rules are missing, but because those things are not in line with the sport, not to say that everyone understands, but I didn't expect someone to be so shameless later.

Americans, for various reasons, and even in many respects, have become metaphysical and make a lot of jokes.

But Europeans have never forgotten the original purpose of football.

Nor is it allowed to exploit loopholes in the rules to take advantage of them.

Therefore, many foul actions in football, some are penalized, some are not, and the reason for excluding the impact of black whistle match-fixing lies in the referee's judgment of the motives of both sides.

According to the Americans, entering the penalty area, the opponent's leg and the ball carrier make contact, the ball carrier falls, and the absolute penalty.

Even if the ball carrier deliberately uses his own foot to hook the defender's foot, it is a penalty.

But in Europe, in football, the referee thinks that the ball carrier does not fully control the football after entering the penalty area, and the scale of confrontation between the two sides will be much larger than the scale of confrontation after you have possession of the ball.

At this time, you can easily fall, and you are not able to fight it yourself.

Or you enter the penalty area and have no intention of attacking, or you fall to the ground within the normal strength of the confrontation, etc.

Penalties are not awarded.

So Ronaldo has just been in the penalty area, which belongs to "penalties under American ideology" and "fake falls under European ideas".

This yellow card, he didn't eat it unjustly.

Many people are debating which of these two attitudes towards the rules is better or worse.

In fact, these two kinds of confrontation exist in every country and in every field.

"Absolutely according to the rules" seems to be very fair and demagogic at first glance.

But in fact, a careful study will show that it is too idealistic, too easy to exploit loopholes, and is just a big pie drawn by capitalists.

Any loophole in the rules, if a normal person can drill it, then the capitalist can drill it. However, normal people can only drill once in a certain time, while capitalists can drill countless times in a certain period of time by means of hiring, copying, etc.

Who do you say will benefit the most?

This seeming fairness immediately turned into an absolute unfairness.

Therefore, any public social platform, as long as it takes a long time and the water army accounts of capital pour in, the voices of real users are almost gone.

This is the absolute crushing of the individual by capital.

And "subjective regulation" seems unfair and full of trust crisis.

But it can shield the interference of capital to a certain extent, so that the individual's competitor is still an individual, which has given ordinary people a great opportunity.

Even if the subjective regulator is corrupted by capital and deceitful, in large-scale data, this is still a small probability event.

It is far better than that capital can openly crush ordinary people by modifying the rules.

That's why there are so many impressive black whistle games in European football, and there seem to be fewer black whistle games in American basketball, but everyone knows that the NBA controls the game much more than the big five leagues.

So many people love to watch basketball when they are young, and they love to watch football when they are older.

……

At halftime, Violante was brainstorming with the coaching staff.

They tried to plan a better ground fit to penetrate Poland.

But Deng Kai thinks it won't work.

The Poles' iron walls are really strong, and it is extremely difficult to penetrate the ground.

Let alone...... The Portuguese actually have a better way.

"Actually...... Almeida have a lot of heading ability. Deng Kai expressed his opinion on the side.

The coaches looked at Deng Kai with some confusion, as if to say, you shouldn't be here, you should be under the car.

You're just a player and that's the coaches' discussion.

However, head coach Violante has not been silent, but looked at Deng Kai, meaning to let him speak.

Deng Kai continued: "There were several times in the first half, Almeida fought for the top. Although the quality of the goal is not high, as long as it can touch the football, the quality is just a matter of angle adjustment and luck. ”

"Almeida is very tall, even if he can't jump, he has a certain chance of competing for football."

"Ronaldo's bounce is good, and his header ability is also very good."

"If the two of them can always fight for the same point, then it will be difficult for the other side to defend. It's hard to keep an eye on one, but it's hard to keep an eye on two at the same time! ”

"And we have more than one or two players in the team who have good crosses."