Review:

In the match between Croatia and Brazil, Brazil was a little self-tied, and it can only be said that Rivakovic is awesome.

The Netherlands would lose to Argentina, and it would be purely Van Gaal's death, and it would be a tactical and command problem like Brazil, but Van Gaal knew that he could correct his mistake and later woke up.

The Netherlands played Argentina, and it was smashed directly, long passes from the backfield, and crosses from the side, especially on the right side, which was so good, this one was not very useful, Dumfries had many opportunities but did not wait for the pass from his teammates. And this simple style of play is compatible with the Dutch defensive style, you have to penetrate, how can you penetrate if the back line does not go up?

Many people don't understand why almost all of it is the Argentine players who are so much shorter, especially against the Dutch backline. Because the defensive logic of the Netherlands is not to fight, but to seek stability. I'm not afraid that you're holding the ball, as long as you can't play a quick counter-attack, my defender will hold you back and let someone else come and solve you. This defensive concept is suitable for "chamfering at the back, testing on the wing, attacking on the wing, high and low crosses", because it does not require too many troops, and this is how the best games played by the Netherlands.

But this one is not, this time Van Gaal put the dragon slaying knife and didn't use it, and used the sunflower treasure pawn as the main exercise.

From Argentina's point of view, they played better than Brazil, playing a tough style of play in South America, and the players dared to play the ball, which Brazil only played in the first round of the group stage. This is also the biggest reason why Argentina can win, the players are fierce enough, including Messi who played a lot of hoops on the defensive end. Peaches watched the game late, and I couldn't connect Messi's style of play with Argentina's style of play before, but this game let me see the Argentine side of Messi.

Forecast:

The match between Portugal and Morocco must have been a big one, with Portugal winning comfortably and scoring at least three or four. Cristiano Ronaldo will definitely score a goal, and if he doesn't do it, he will have to score a hat-trick (this time it's serious, not just good wishes).

In the last game, Portugal finally stopped playing high balls and figured out the regular attacking mode they should have, which is a process of breaking and standing.

Peaches also said before that Ronaldo's blessing to the team must be huge, but when the players can't maintain normal playing thinking because of Ronaldo's huge influence, Ronaldo has become a burden on the team.

There are many ways to solve this problem, but the most direct one is to take Ronaldo out for the time being, let the team find a way to play, and then add Ronaldo back to it to play the finishing touch.

Those who don't think Cristiano Ronaldo is important can watch Spain play against Brazil without Vinicius or Neymar. Portugal's current regular attacking ability is the same as these teams, and it seems to be the best, but when it comes to the real attack, it depends on individual players. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo's header and nose for goals, Leao's speed and longitudinal sprint, B Fei's imaginative passing, etc.

Portugal has a combination of fluid and powerful conventional attacks and comprehensive and adequate attacking methods, and even against France, the chances of winning are much greater.

Because the French team's conventional attack is not very strong, Rabiot has more than enough offensive creativity, although he has a hand in the goal, but the imagination of passing is relatively poor, which is really a waste of Mbappe and Dembele's two devilish wings and Giroud and Plaid's two old monsters in the frontcourt.

Therefore, although the championship prediction chart of Peaches before the World Cup is somewhat inconsistent in the process, it does not affect the uniqueness of the results.

See what I mean!

In the match between France and England, the French team is sure to be the winner in the end.

Both teams have players with outstanding individual qualities, but in terms of the team's regular attack, France have figured out their own pattern, while England are still far behind. Kane is England's only playmaker, and as long as the retreating Kane is strangled to death, England will basically have to pray to get a goal.

There is only one way out for England to win, and that is to shrink across the board and use the ability of their wide stars to play against France. But...... England has always been favored, star-studded, and if they want to play in a relaxed way, even if the coach agrees, the players don't agree, the players don't agree, and the fans don't agree. If you don't do it, you have to be counterattacked by France...... So England will lose.

As a family, everyone is welcome to discuss.

We certainly don't ask people to have the same point of view, it's important to communicate and bring more ideas to the table so that everyone can see the diversity of the world.

(End of chapter)