How could this actress be so ugly!

Pedro was shocked.

Generally speaking, in big-budget movies, the selection criteria for roles are very strict, handsome men and beautiful women are the most basic requirements, even if the plot requires the selection of harlequins, it is also distinctive.

But what's going on with this actress, the ugliness is so obvious, it even makes people sick to their stomachs and makes people feel physically uncomfortable.

How did such an actor act in a movie, this is simply provoking the audience.

Could it be an important supporting role?

Pedro couldn't help but think that such an ugly actor couldn't be the protagonist.

But the development of the plot soon shatters his illusions, the actor's name is Lucy, a rich lady, she has a fiancé named Carter, and she is very infatuated with her.

The two of them bought first-class tickets and prepared to take the luxury cruise ship Titanic 2 to the United States.

Seeing this, Pedro's brow furrowed.

From the beginning, he felt that something was wrong with the movie, but he never realized that something was wrong.

It was only now that he suddenly reacted.

How can the set of this movie be so bad?

Isn't this the first class cabin of a luxury cruise ship, how does it look like a classroom?

Isn't the place where the oil paintings are hung on the blackboard?

And the oil painting is also ugly, it doesn't look like a masterpiece at all, like an amateur's casual graffiti.

What's the situation?

Cameron hasn't always made movies with excellence.

It is said that when the Titanic was first filmed, in order to pursue the truth, the tableware and chairs on the ship1 were all specially customized by famous artists, so as to be exactly the same as the sinking Titanic that year, and even if it cost a lot of money, it was not hesitated to spend a lot of money.

No matter what Cameron's personality is, his attitude towards making movies is something that no one can say.

But.

How could the set of this movie suck so badly?

Pedro racked his brains and didn't understand what was going on, how could Cameron's movie and set be so bad.

Is there any meaning in this?

The plot soon progressed to the cruise ship sailing and the first-class banquet was held.

At the banquet, Lucy, a rich lady, used rhetoric to confuse her fiancé upside down, and she was still hooking up with others, which can be said to be extremely green tea.

By chance, she left the first class cabin and ran to the deck, wanting to enjoy the scenery.

Here she meets Jett, a poor boy in the third class.

Jett is very handsome, with a pair of beautiful blue eyes that are as deep as the sea, and he is also the most handsome actor in Titanic 2, and he immediately became the focus of the audience when he appeared on the screen.

After discovering this handsome guy in the third class, Lucy was overwhelmed by the other party's appearance and actually took the initiative to go up and talk to him.

Jett didn't want to pay attention to Lucy, an ugly girl, but when he knew that Lucy was a rich man living in first class, he couldn't help but be disgusted and took the initiative to hook up with Lucy.

The two hit it off, dried firewood, and soon got together.

Pedro was stunned.

How is the plot of "Titanic 2" the same as "Titanic".

It's all the stories of a rich lady who lives in first class and a poor boy in third class, and the name is similar to the first part, Ruth becomes Lucy, and Jack becomes Jet.

The only change is that Miss Rich is played by an ugly girl, and she has changed from a woman who hates the rules and regulations of high society to a green tea who likes to hook up with men and red apricots are out of the wall.

Why did Cameron shoot like this?

This is to completely subvert the previous movie!

It's okay to subvert, but don't you shoot so badly?

The plot is progressing rapidly, Lucy and Jett, the two dog men and women, are hot, Lucy falls in love with Jett's face, Jett falls in love with Lucy's money, and a pair of dog men and women are in love with each other and hook up.

During this time, a friend who lived in the third class with Jett asked him why he was with such an ugly woman. Jett bluntly said that because this woman is rich.

This plot completely revealed Jet's unbearable character, which made the audience who originally had a good impression of Jett because of his appearance extremely disdainful.

Soon, Ruth's fiancé Carter accidentally bumped into Lucy and Jett together, and the infatuated Carter was extremely surprised and asked Ruth what was the relationship between the two?

Lucy boldly says that Jett is a friend she met by chance, and fools Carter in a few words.

The most amazing thing is that when Lucy fooled Carter, she didn't forget to continue to hook up with the poor boy Jett, and when she came to a husband, she can be called scum to the extreme.

The stupid Carter didn't find anything wrong, but warmly invited Jett to dinner, and his personality can be said to be very good.

The Titanic also had a classic dinner plot.

Carl, the rich Ruth's fiancé, deliberately wanted to make things difficult for him at the dinner party in high society because he looked down on the poor boy Jack, but Jack was extraordinary, but he was in the limelight and made Carl lose face.

This plot fully illustrates that money does not represent everything about a person, and the connotation of the poor is actually better than that of the rich, but because it is not bad enough, it is not rich enough.

Regardless of whether Cameron thought so when he filmed this scene, this is how the majority of poor people understand it anyway.

But in "Titanic 2", this plot has changed a lot.

Carter, the wealthy fiancé, is a kind man, and when he hears that Jett is a good friend of Lucy, he not only does not get angry, but wants to promote him.

As a result, Jett is a person who is ruined on the outside, although he has a handsome appearance, but he is very unbearable on the inside, he is a complete straw bag, and he not only failed to catch Carter's support and overtures, but instead made a big ugly appearance, and lost a big face at the dinner party of high society.

When he saw this, Pedro was extremely incomprehensible.

Why did Cameron choose to shoot this plot in a way that subverted the previous movie, and what did he think.

The point is, can the dinner party of the upper class not be so inferior.

At the time of the Titanic, the upper-class dinner was a large room, ornate decoration, bright lights, and luxurious tableware.

But in this movie, the table is plastic, the cutlery is plastic, and the dishes on the table are still burgers, fried chicken and sandwiches?

Nima's upper-class dinner party eats this?

The drink at the dinner was actually a low-end fat house happy water like Coke.

Is there a mistake?

Pedro couldn't hold it back.

He could barely bear the sloppy set at the front of the movie, but he couldn't bear it anymore when he saw the Coke and hamburger fried chicken sandwiches blatantly placed on the table and a big close-up.

Cameron: How can you make a movie like this?

(End of chapter)