"Of course, I don't mean to mean that Lao Liu and Xiao Tan were both killed by you, because the thumb print on Xiao Tan's neck alone excludes the possibility that she was killed by you. I mean, you are most likely an accomplice in the murder of both of them."

"It is true that the fingerprints on Xiao Tan's neck and the comminuted fracture on the left side of Lao Liu's head made us think that they should have been a left-hander, and since you are not left-handed, then this left-hander should be Shiji. Thus subconsciously excluding the possibility that you are a murderer."

"It's also a good use for you. So in the third story, you have nothing to do with the death of the sixth and the little Tan, and we almost believe it."

"Although you didn't directly kill Lao Liu and Xiao Tan, did you help Shi Ji in the process of committing his crimes? Or, if the sixth child hadn't died all of a sudden, would you have stepped forward and put a few sticks on his head?"

"In my opinion, it's very likely. In the second story, the reason why you took care of everything and blamed the deaths of Lao Liu and Xiao Tan on your own head was that in addition to continuing to conceal Shi Ji's whereabouts, you yourself should be an accomplice and an important reason. If the police find out the truth, you yourself will die. In that case, the only one who dies is of course the best choice."

"Judging from Shi Ji's style of acting, in order to hide his whereabouts, he killed Lao Liu and Xiao Tan, but in the end, he didn't kill you, except because he regarded you as his father, and the fact that you were an accomplice should also be an important reason."

"We've all killed two people together, so what's not to trust each other? Once you call the police and confess Shi Ji's whereabouts, it is equivalent to confessing your murder to the police. Therefore, Shi Ji does not think there is any need to kill you."

"But in the end, it was Shiji who called the police, not you, why is that?"

Monk Tian dodged his gaze and did not dare to look at Li Zhudao.

"In any case, Shi Ji probably didn't expect that our police would confirm his existence through other clues. He would never have imagined that you would make up a third story and put all the blame for the tragedy at the White Lotus Temple on him."

Then, Li Zhudao changed his words again:

"Don't you want to protect the interhistory? Why did they turn all the blame on him? This reason has actually been said a long time ago, because we have confirmed the existence of Shi Ji, and your big package is meaningless, rather than this, it is better to put the charge of killing Lao Liu and Xiao Tan on Shi Ji's head."

"Shi Ji has already taken his life, as long as he is caught by us, he will definitely die. If we can't catch him, he'll still be alive. You also know this, so what does it matter if Shi Ji has two more lives on his body, it will have no effect on his life and death."

Monk Tian squeezed out a smile that was strong and dry: "Young man, you have to tell the evidence, you can't be blind."

Before the words fell, the door of the interrogation room was knocked open, and Xiao Wu handed two identical documents to Lu Kai: "Director Yu's final test results on the White Lotus Temple case have not yet come out, but there are some preliminary test findings, let me send them over, saying that one of these findings is very unexpected, and I should let you know as soon as possible."

After Lu Kai took it, he sat back in his place and handed one of them to Li Zhudao.

Li Zhudao opened it and took a look, and the first thing that caught his eye was the results of the examination of the wound on the head of the sixth child. ap.

According to the on-site investigation, it should be the rebar bar, that is, the iron rod that Monk Tian said, that is, the iron rod that caused the injury to the head of the old six, and the fatal injury was a comminuted skull fracture on the left side of the head of the old six. What is certain is that the iron rod struck Lao Liu's head, because the partial contusions on the forehead and the top of the head have typical thread characteristics.

However, in the fatal wound area on the left side of the head, no thread-like features were found, and only blunt force blows were found. This is due to the fact that the fatal wound was caused by repeated blows.

An example is an example to illustrate. For example, if you buy a piece of pork and chop it on the pork with a kitchen knife, relevant professionals can analyze the general characteristics of the kitchen knife according to the knife that was chopped on the pork. However, if you use a kitchen knife to chop the meat into meat filling dumplings, then it is impossible to tell what is chopped from the meat filling.

Other words

The murder weapon that caused the death of the sixth child may have been a rebar bar, a wooden stick, or the back of a knife. In short, all long and hard objects, as long as they are repeatedly hit on the left side of the head, can cause such fatal wounds.

At the same time, there were no thread marks on several contusions on the top of Lao Liu's head. In other words, in addition to the rebar bar, there is another blunt object that has hit the head of the old six.

In addition, the distribution of blood stains on the iron rod can be divided into three sections, part of the blood stains in the upper section are Tian Monk's, a large number of blood stains in the middle section are the sixth one, and some of the blood stains flow to the upper section, so it presents a flow of injection, and the blood stains in the lower section are splashed, all of which are the blood of the sixth child.

The key lies in the sputtered blood in the lower part of the iron rod. After a person dies, the heart stops beating and stops supplying blood, causing blood to flow back into the hollow arteries and not spurting blood. In other words, the sputtering blood in the lower part of the iron rod is undoubtedly caused by the blood spurting out of the head of the sixth child before he died completely, and splattering on the iron rod.

For this to happen, there are several possibilities.

First of all, before the sixth child died completely, the murderer held an iron rod and repeated the blow on the left side of the sixth child's head, and the sixth child's blood spurted out and splattered on the iron rod.

The question is that the iron rod is covered with blood from top to bottom, and where did the murderer carry the iron rod? No matter which part of the iron rod the murderer holds, due to the occlusion of the hand, there will inevitably be a blank area on the iron bar. But there is no such blank space on the iron bar. Therefore, this possibility is self-defeating.

At the same time, after the iron rod was discarded, the sixth child did not die completely, and after the blood was splashed on the iron rod, the sixth child died completely, and there would also be blood stains on the iron rod.

In addition, after the murderer discarded the murder weapon, the sixth child did not die completely, and the blood splattered onto the iron rod, and then the murderer took out another crime tool and continued to hit the sixth child on the head repeatedly, until the sixth died. Of course, when holding another crime tool to hit the head of the old six, the blood from the blow may also splash on the discarded iron bar.

Combined with the fact that, as mentioned above, the sixth child suffered another blunt blow to the head, there is no doubt that the third possibility is true.

The question is also that in this process, was it Shi Ji or Monk Tian who carried out the murder with another tool of crime?

More critically, since there was another tool for committing the crime, why was it not found at the scene, but only a rebar bar?

There is no doubt that the other tool of the crime that disappeared should have been "disposed of", that is, it had been discarded outside the scene, and as for where it was dumped, I am afraid that only Monk Tian knows.

Because the iron rod is thread-shaped, the surface of the stick is concave and convex and rough, and fingerprints cannot be extracted, so it is not certain whether it is Monk Tian or Shi Ji who is holding the iron rod. But what about the discarded tools of crime?

What does it mean that Monk Tian did not take away the iron rod at the scene, but "disposed of" another tool of the crime? Is it because it is Shi Ji who is holding an iron rod, and he is holding another tool for committing crimes?

Under the premise of this hypothesis, combined with the fact that the fatal wound on the left side of Lao Liu's head cannot be determined whether it was caused by the blow of the rebar bar, it is possible that Shi Ji or Monk Tian killed Lao Liu in the end.

These test results did not really surprise or surprise Li Zhudao and Lu Kai, what really surprised their jaws was the short line of text at the end of the information: blood DNA comparison confirmed that Tian Hesheng (Tian Monk) and Zeng Ji are both biological fathers and sons.

It is very likely that Yu Dewang just wanted to confirm who the blood on the iron rod belonged to through a blood DNA test, and he would not have thought that such a result would be confirmed when he was killed.

After closing the information, Li Zhudao and Lu Kai saw shock and surprise in each other's eyes.

The two stared at Monk Tian in unison, with surprise in their eyes, but also deep sympathy and sorrow.

Monk Tian was inexplicably looked at by them, and he was uncomfortable, but he still pretended to be calm: "Should it be...... I said there should be evidence, so what evidence is there?"

Monk Tian always has some words that make people laugh and cry. If he rejects Li Zhudao's analytical hypothesis with "evidence", this question-like question fully exposes his thief's heart and place

Three hundred taels of silver.

But now it is no longer worth mentioning whether there is evidence or not. This DNA test result was enough to pry Monk Tian's mouth open and let him tell the truth about that night.

The joint fake son murdered his own son, and even planned to confess to the fake son, these behaviors of Monk Tian show that he most likely did not know that the sixth child was his own son.

When the sixth child's mother faced the questioning of the sixth "adoptive father" family, she did not reveal who the sixth child's biological father was, but who would have thought that it would be Monk Tian?

What kind of bloody relationship is there between Monk Tian and Lao Liu's mother, I'm afraid only they know.

Monk Tian traveled all over China to find his son Tian Ruiwu, and he certainly never imagined that after spending twenty or thirty years searching for no results, God would quietly arrange for his other son to appear by his side.

Ironically, it is very likely that Monk Tian personally destroyed this gift from God to him. It is very likely that the murderer of Lao Liu was Monk Tian, not Shi Ji.

This is truly a human tragedy.

Should Monk Tian know such a cruel truth? If he is not allowed to know, he will most likely continue to "make up stories" about the course of the crime that night.

Li Zhudao put the information in front of Monk Tian's desk and pointed to the last line of words: "Take a good look at it yourself."