Zhou Hai's anger did not cause much splash.

After all, it wasn't Ye Luo who scolded him, and Ye Luo's head couldn't be blamed for this matter.

And the endless variety of versions of "Burrow" on the Internet quickly suppressed the popularity of this "Chess Ming".

It is no exaggeration to say that "The Burrow" is definitely the hottest article in the literary circle.

The content is simple, but the idea is not simple. Especially with Liu Yuxi's experience, the deep meaning of this article can be said to be layer after layer.

There are many big Vs on the Internet interpreting it, and even the literary critics of the Writers' Association have personally died.

You must know that since the Ancient Literature Association and the New Literature Association split from the Writers' Association, there are basically no people in the Writers' Association, only some members such as literary critics and reportage writers.

Moreover, they have never been involved in the contradictions between the two families.

But this time, even the people in the writers' association couldn't help but comment.

Liu Yulong, Weibo certified is a member of the Chinese Writers Association, a well-known scholar and literary critic.

He also followed the trend of a song "Literary Ming" on Weibo, and wrote a long article praising "Burrow Ming".

The feedback from netizens at the bottom is also very good.

……

This ancient literary festival directly made "The Burrow" sweep the literary circle. At this time, no one's article popularity can compete with Ye Luo's "Burrow".

Even the top few works of the New Literature Association in this essay collection were suppressed by "The Burrow".

The full name of the New Literature Association is "Modern Literary Creation Association". In contrast to the Ancient Literature Society, they focus on the creation and research of modern literature, such as modern poetry, prose, novels, essays, and so on.

Compared with the decline of the Ancient Literature Association in recent years, the New Literature Association is star-studded. Almost eighty percent of the well-known writers in the literary circle are members of the New Literature Association.

In particular, the modern novelists of the New Literature Association are the most influential group in the Chinese literary circle today.

Of course, the two associations in the literary circle have been at odds for more than a decade.

The New Literature Association believes that it is now a modern society, and it is necessary to reduce the proportion of classical literature in the compulsory education stage, and they claim that the inheritance of classical culture should bring forth the new, integrate the characteristics of the new era, and keep pace with the times.

The ideological connotation of the Ancient Literature Association is that "the ancient text is the core, and the new text is the table", and they believe that the people of the New Literature Association are abandoning their martial arts.

In this way, the two groups of people have been arguing in academic circles for many years. Now it has developed to the point where water and fire are incompatible, and no matter what it is, it has to be fought for.

Just like this essay call, as soon as the essay of the Ancient Literature Association came out, the New Literature Association immediately followed.

Originally, the essay collection of the New Literature Association was much more popular than the ancient text!

Whether it is poetry, prose, or short stories, the quality is very good, and the number of votes is far higher than that of the Ancient Literature Association.

However, what they didn't expect was that the Ancient Literature Association was born out of nowhere!

A "Burrow" swept the entire literary world at an unbelievable speed!

Even, even the people of the writers' association praised it!

Is it worth going on like this?

At this time, Hao Zhijun, a famous poet of the New Literature Association, fired the first shot of attacking "The Burrow", and he pointed out sharply on Weibo, "Recently, the article "The Burrow" has been very popular, and I also looked at it, and it is indeed okay. However, I strongly disagree with the author's creative approach! The creation of articles must be based on reality. What does it mean that the author made up a Tang character? What is the difference between creating your own fictitious background and deceiving readers? He is not writing a novel, and what valuable thinking can such a deceptive creation, completely detached from reality, bring to the reader? And what is the practical significance? ”

"Literary creation is a very serious matter, it must have depth, it must have connotation, it is not such a mess!"

Hao Zhijun's words can be described as extremely sharp, but soon some netizens stood up to refute it.

"It's funny, what does the quality of people's articles have to do with their creative background?"

"It's just red-eyed, isn't it? People's articles are there, and the creative background is fictitious, can you deny that other people's articles are well written? ”

"Stop talking nonsense, write your poems well."

But soon, more and more people from the New Literature Association came forward.

All of them are well-known bigwigs in the literary world, ranging from highly respected university professors to well-known experts and scholars in the industry.

The famous novelist Zhang Rumeng reposted Hao Zhijun's long article and commented: "Mr. Hao's comment is to the point, I don't know why "The Burrow" has such a big popularity. What is he trying to convey in this article? Embody your own spirit of being at ease with what comes your way and not being afraid of power? Hehe, is this dissatisfied with your sports channel? ”

Mr. Yang Huan, a professor at the School of Arts and Humanities of Peking University, also said: "Literary creation should be rooted in reality, come from the people, and be close to the lives of the masses. What is the practical point of writing articles by relying on fantasy in this way? ”

Even, some scholars directly buttoned Ye Luo's hat, "Ye Luo is engaging in historical nihilism!" If children read this and think that Liu Yuxi is a real historical figure, then what is it? If everyone made up history at will, wouldn't it be a mess? Especially the way of writing Ye Luo, it is even more harmful! He doesn't understand literature at all! ”

All of a sudden, seven or eight influential figures from the Xinwen Association stood up and angrily denounced Ye Luo.

Their respective fans also supported it.

"Mr. Hao said what I wanted to say, fictional things don't stand up at all!"

"If even the creative background is fake, then isn't the main idea expressed in this article also fake?"

"I also told my children the story of Liu Yuxi, and it's really scary to think about it now. If the child really treats Liu Yuxi as a real person, won't it be a disaster? ”

"Ye Luo, this is harmful!"

"Hurry up and block him!"

"Can something made up be a classic? It's hilarious! ”

Although there are also die-hard fans on the Internet, it is insignificant compared to the overwhelming doubts and criticisms.

Even, even some passers-by who like "The Burrow" will be shaken in the face of the questioning and angry denunciation of these professors and scholars.

This matter fermented very quickly, so much so that there were a lot of abusive voices in the comment area of "The Burrow".

When the people of the Ancient Literature Association saw that public opinion had reversed so quickly, they immediately took action.

You have professors and scholars, but we don't?

You're going to post online, we don't?

Soon, Professor Zhao Baokun, the author of the song "Sending Lin Zihua Out of Beijing at the Dinner Party", who is now ranked second in the essay, posted an article in support of Ye Luo: "Historical nihilism? It's hilarious! Do you know what historical nihilism is? If Mr. Ye writes about historical nihilism, then what are you who write novels? ”

Professor Feng Jiahua of Peking University's School of Arts also stood up and directly angrily scolded Professor Yang Huan, who is also Peking University, "The surname Yang is that you are talking nonsense with your eyes open, right?" Old eyes faint? Why didn't Mr. Ye get close to the masses? Is there less injustice in everyone's life? Are there few people who have a similar experience to Yoo Yu-seok? ”

One after another masters of classical literature stood up in solidarity with Ye Luo.

On the one hand, there is the angry criticism of the organization of the New Literature Association, and on the other hand, the manpower of the Ancient Literature Association is very praised.

The two waves of people insisted on their own words, and they did not back down!

A group of people are playing with pens, and all kinds of words have to be spoken.

There were fierce quarrels and debates everywhere, and netizens also stood in line one after another, arguing in the comment area.

All of a sudden, the entire literary world was in a mess.

At this time, Ye Luo, who was holding his mobile phone at home, was also watching this big quarrel.

I don't understand literature?

My historical nihilism?

I write articles that are out of the masses? Meaningless?

Depend on!

Lao Liu! Someone scolds you!