Spray point 1: Why didn't the male protagonist just do Merster?

Reason 1: After the male protagonist deconstructs Merst's memory, he finds that he has not done evil and does not meet the kill criteria.

Reason 2: Behind Merster is Hothams College. This is the equivalent of Hogwarts in the Harry Potter series.

Reason 3: The male protagonist found that Merster had use value, that is, he could be fooled by himself.

The above three reasons are clearly written in the text, and the reader who will be open should have the phenomenon of "quantum reading".

I know that everyone likes to watch the plot that kills people in seconds without saying a word.

To be honest, I also like to write this kind of plot.

But I'm the author of the "Clean Net Operation", and I know how many so-called "decisive killings" have been killed in the operation. So when I write, I will make sure that no "good person" in my pen was mistakenly killed by the male protagonist.

I can promise here that all the "bad guys" in this book are seconds, and there will be no soft-hearted situation of the male protagonist. At the same time, the "good guys" will not be killed by mistake.

...

Spray point 2: Is there too much to say between the male protagonist and Merster? And the male protagonist behaves differently than before?

Reason 1: The male protagonist is deconstructing Merster while making up words on the spot according to the results of the deconstruction. This is "talking to people."

Reason 2: The heroic words made by the male protagonist are obviously deliberately sticking to the "father" image in Kimmerst's impression.

There are nearly 7,000 words of deconstruction content and psychological activities of the male protagonist's organizational ideas, which I didn't put in the text. Because after repeated consideration, I feel that putting these 7,000 words in the main text will make the rhythm of the text very slow, and book friends will reflect the number of words.

I thought the reader could understand why the male protagonist did this, but it turned out that I was wrong. In the future, I will be more "white", and stuff all the things that the male protagonist thinks of and deconstructs into the text. It's better to be sprayed with "hydrology" than to be misunderstood.

...

Spray point 3: Is the male protagonist's position changing too fast?

Maybe it's because I'm too diligent in updating, so everyone will feel too fast.

In fact, since the male protagonist entered the Golden Federation, nearly 400,000 words have been posted. And the number of words used to explain the change of position reached nearly 30,000 words.

People read too smoothly and coherently, so the feeling of changing too quickly.

If I divide these 30,000 words into a 2,000-word chapter and send them out in 6 to 7 days, I probably won't feel fast.

In addition, the change of the male protagonist's position meets the following conditions:

Condition 1: The male protagonist insists on not hurting good people.

Condition 2: The male protagonist finds that judging the wicked privately will attract the pursuit of good people.

Condition 3: When the male protagonist finds himself facing the pursuit of good people, there is no better way than to escape.

Based on the above three conditions, the male protagonist decided not to judge the wicked privately in the future.

...

Squirting point four: Damn, the male protagonist can't judge the wicked privately, I still look at your sister?

In the update content from the 14th to the 15th day later, the male protagonist can judge the wicked openly.

...

Spray point five: The male protagonist of the neutral and kind camp is not likable.

Response:

Chaotic goodness means: I don't care if these rules of the game are reasonable or not, I reject them all and establish new rules of the game according to my own understanding of goodness.

Orderly kindness means that I unconditionally acknowledge and obey the existing rules of the game, and practice my good deeds.

Neutrality and kindness means that I feel that the existing rules of the game are good, and I can continue to abide by the existing rules of the game. On the other hand, if I feel that the existing rules of the game do not conform to my understanding of "goodness", I will negate the existing rules of the game and establish new ones.

Neutrality and goodness have a very flexible moral bottom line, not the Virgin, who is the product of the camp of orderly goodness.

If you carefully compare the unsealed wizard texts, it is not difficult to find that the male protagonists of all legal wizard texts are basically neutral and kind.

...

Spray point 6: Didn't the male protagonist say that he had to follow the rules, then he would go to Tatis to be judged.

The male protagonist is neutral and kind, not a fool. He considered Tatis's decree unreasonable and would not go to Tatis's trial.

...

Spray Point Seven: Why don't you kill Tatis?

There is a wrong, and there is a debtor. Wrongful killing of an innocent = the entire book is taken off the shelves.