It's exactly what Jing thinks it is.

He never used a single causality weapon during the next 750 million light-years journey.

He was determined to see how the Great Universe was going to deal with him.

But the rules have their own rules.

Jing's own karma has not yet accumulated to a sufficient extent, so naturally he will not come to him.

It is also impossible for the Great Cosmic Will to stare at those cosmic beings that involve the rules of cause and effect every day.

Nearly a third of the way through the journey, the starry sky behind him already looked like he had observed galaxies in the Ninggeng Galaxy.

"It's so similar."

Jing looked at the starry sky behind him and thought of the life he had once lived in the inner universe.

But at the same time, Jing felt a little regretful.

In the vast universe, I guess I can't find the location of the Milky Way.

"If I could remember the starry sky I saw when I was on Earth, maybe I would be able to guess where the Milky Way is."

It's just a pity that Jing doesn't pay special attention to the starry night above the earth.

His crossing is not the kind of person who remembers his past clearly.

"I came to the Ninggeng Galaxy through the Asterisk Civilization, so it is impossible for me to come from the First Cosmic Era, and the Second Cosmic Era has long passed, so I am actually a life in the Third Cosmic Era."

"The Milky Way is in the Third Cosmic Era, I just can't find it. Where does my cause come from? In the vast universe, I can't see the path I came from. ”

Cause and effect about oneself is something that Jing often thinks about during this journey.

Jing already has a very deep understanding of the rules of cause and effect, and he understands that there is a source for many things in this world.

That is, their cause.

It's just that Jing can't find where he came from.

Although Jing knows that he is from the solar system in the Milky Way, where is this solar system?

Jing couldn't find that place.

It is precisely because he cannot find the location of the solar system that Jing cannot find his own cause, which leads to a reasonable doubt about the existence of his own source.

Is the solar system fictional?

Everything he knows is actually told to him by the Asterisk Civilization, so is there a possibility that all of this is forged by the Asterisk Civilization.

Jing does have such speculation.

It's just that Jing prefers to believe that everything in his mind is real.

This is important.

Because all these things are the root of the scene, the cause of the scene.

Without them, the scene would not exist.

In the rule of cause and effect, this is where Jing is most deadly.

If there is a technological civilization that also involves the rules of cause and effect, and has a weapon that negates the causal type of causality, then it only needs to be that they only need to attack the cause of the existence of the scene to be able to produce the effect that the scene does not exist.

Of course, this is not to say that after the attack, Jing disappeared.

After all, this is not the "grandfather paradox" in time travel, kill your grandfather and you disappear.

Even if that kind of effect is produced in the weapon of the law of cause and effect, Jing will still exist, but Jing will eventually disappear into the universe in some form after this.

This can take the form of war, or it can be the collapse of the universe.

It's just that such a denial of cause and effect cannot be made at all when the specific situation of the scene cannot be understood.

And don't forget that the origin of Jing is currently in the hands of the Star Civilization.

If you want to realize the effect of the non-existence of scenery by denying the cause of the appearance of the scene, you cannot bypass the asterisk civilization

Just think about it with your ass that it is impossible for the asterisk civilization to tell the rest of the life about the origin of Jing.

So in a sense, Jing is relatively safe in this regard.

But Jing thinks about this problem not to think that he has a hole in the cause of his past, but that Jing wants to know his past.

It's about the scenery itself.

How can a life that wants to grasp the rules of cause and effect but does not even know whether its own past is true or false, and has not even completed the understanding of its own causes?

And this, the asterisk civilization has actually said.

What they mean is that when Jing returns to the inner universe one day, he will naturally understand where he came from.

The whole is a riddler.

However, with how much Jing has seen and heard in the big universe, he also has a rough guess about his own scene.

As mentioned before, he is from the Third Cosmic Era.

It seems to be headless and brainless, but it makes Jing Jing's past real.

"By negating the cause to achieve the desired effect, that is, if I want to get the effect of 'the Milky Way cannot be found', then the instruction I need to enter can be 'the Milky Way does not exist in the Third Universe', because in this way, the Milky Way that does not exist naturally means that I cannot find it."

In the fruit of "the Milky Way cannot be found", "unable to find" is the realization of this effect, and "the Milky Way" is the cause of this effect. So the negation is that the Milky Way doesn't exist.

"Or, I can say, 'Jing won't go looking for the Milky Way,' no, if Jing won't go,' that's actually an affirmation, and 'Jing won't go' is actually a form of fruit. It is not this form of negation of cause that achieves effect. ”

"Although the causal weapon of direct causality is very direct, the true understanding of causality is not as good as the latter."

"The causal weapon of negating cause requires the user and the creator to have a strong understanding and thinking ability of the causal relationship in the causal rules. After all, if you are not careful, the negative cause is set incorrectly, and the result may be different. ”

The main reason why Jing thinks about this is that he is now constructing a causal weapon that negates causes.

Compared with the causal weapon of definite effect, the causal weapon of direct negation of cause is more strategic in the throughout.

Because the causal law weapon of definite effect produces a predetermined result for the future of the target, and it corresponds not to the present goal, but to the future goal.

But the causal weapon that negates cause is directly acting on the present target.

It's as if direct control was carried out on the target.

As a simple example, when a causal weapon dominates a war, the input command is often "Civilization A will lose a war with civilization B".

But how civilization A failed, we don't know.

In the causal weapon of negating cause, since "defeat" is the effect, "war" is the cause, and the command that needs to be entered is the negation of war.

Note that this negation of the cause is a definite thing, not a negation of the input cause.

For example, "Civilization A and Civilization B will live in peace."

This directly affirms that civilization A and civilization B live in peace, not that the peace between civilization A and civilization B is denied.

If the two civilizations are peaceful, war will not happen.

Of course, if we have to say that civilization A has to lose in the war, we can actually think about it from another angle.

What is war?

Its essence can be seen as a conflict of interest.

Wars between civilization A and civilization B are mostly over interests.

Then it is only necessary for civilization A to accept all the conditions of civilization B, even if such conditions seem to be somewhat humiliating, but when the causal law weapon of negating cause and effect comes into effect, civilization A will accept the conditions of civilization B.

And after accepting such conditions, the war between civilization A and civilization B will naturally stop.

In this way, can it be regarded as a failure of civilization A?

Therefore, the causal weapon that negates the cause, which produces control over the direct attack of the target, is more strategic than the causal weapon that determines the effect.

But with this advantage, the causal weapon of negating cause is flawed.

Because it directly acts on the current goal, and it does not involve the rules of cause and effect like Jing, even those that do not involve the rules of cause and effect, they are basically at the advanced level.

At the higher levels of life and civilization, wouldn't they have questions about their own peculiar condition? 、

Therefore, the goal of the causal law weapon that negates cause and effect is easier to perceive its own problems.

In this regard, the causal law of deterministic effect weapons does not produce any anomalies in the current target because the target of its effect is the target of the future.

In terms of concealment, the causal law weapon of definite effect is superior.

But in terms of effect alone, the immediate effect of the current target is generated immediately, which means that there is not much uncertainty that happens.

If the causal weapon obtained by the Mengcha civilization at the beginning was a causal weapon that negated the causal law, it is estimated that there would not be a scene of escaping from them in the future.

You only need to type in "Jing and Mengcha civilization fight to the death".

"Fight to the death" directly negates the fact that Jing will escape, so it is impossible for Jing to escape.

Of course, if it is a causal law weapon that negates causes, it is still a big question whether the Mengsha civilization will use it.

Come up and directly enter a "Jing will die in the war with the Mengsha civilization", if it is a negative cause, how should this be calculated?

If "Jing died in the war with the Moncha civilization" is a negative cause, then what is its effect?

What happens when Jing dies in war?

Mengsha civilization didn't know, and Jing himself couldn't think of it.

However, in fact, at the beginning, the Mengcha civilization entered the instruction "The Mengcha civilization will find the scene".

"Looking at negative causes from the perspective of determining the effect is really a bit of a headache. This ensures that the user has a deep understanding of the causal relationship of an event, and also needs to analyze the negative cause from the desired effect. ”

Jing relaxed his mind slightly.

How do you understand the cause and effect of an event?

Naturally, it's a lot of analysis.

Analyze from your own experience, analyze from various events, dissect each thing, and think carefully about where the cause and effect relationship lies.

And look back.

If the negation that "the Milky Way does not exist in the Third Universe" is true, can the effect of Jing's belief that he exists in the Third Universe be denied?

Since Jing does not exist in the Third Cosmic Era, should Jing disappear?

The causal weapon of negating cause is undoubtedly a sharp weapon.

It's just hard to master.

(End of chapter)