However, based on past experience.

This kind of netizens' criticism and accusations are actually meaningless.

These institutions tend to have a sense of arrogance that ordinary people cannot understand.

It's like my arrogance, 'Chen has acted all his life, why should he explain it to others'.

Netizens questioned?

In spite of!

Everyone condemns!

Never ask!

How about next time?

Still so, die without repentance!

It's as if they are the real authorities, and the ones pointing at the Internet are just some nonsense guys, not worth mentioning at all!

One thing to say, this confidence comes inexplicably, and it feels like turning away his food and clothing parents.

There have been many cases in the past where awarding bodies have been questioned.

But without exception, the choices of these institutions are to close their eyes and ears.

No matter how far public opinion has gotten and what the consequences will be.

For them, these netizens are just three minutes of popularity.

When the time is over, won't there be nothing?

So, when someone offered to go to this agency and ask for clarification.

Someone immediately began to pour cold water.

"It's useless, they definitely won't reply."

It's just that these people were soon slapped in the face.

This time, the judging body not only responded, but also very quickly.

It's as if the hundreds or thousands of words of explanation are edited in a second, and then uploaded directly.

"In response to the questions of many netizens, regarding whether there is an insider in not awarding awards to Ms. Bai Ling, this institution seriously makes the following explanations!"

"First, the award was announced not only based on the comprehensive traffic data of major websites, but also listened to the opinions of musicians in the authoritative circle, so as to conduct a comprehensive evaluation!"

"Second, most of Ms. Bai Ling's works such as "Under the Sea" and "Torment" do not meet the requirements of this award, such as emotional value, such as social orientation, etc......"

"Third ,......"

"Fourth ......"

"Finally, I hope that all netizens can treat this matter rationally and objectively, and do not become a sharp blade in the hands of some people with ulterior motives, and purify the Internet environment, everyone is responsible!"

When the information was published, it immediately received a large number of views.

After all, it is related to Bai Ling, and the disturbance in this matter is still quite large.

After reading this so-called statement, the matter showed no sign of subsiding, and even began to intensify.

First of all, this life seems to have an explanation, but in fact it is still the same arrogance.

In some details, some sense of superiority is reflected.

For example, why does the award have to be given to Bai Ling?

They did not refer to superficial data, but also through the consideration of some authoritative figures, and finally came to a conclusion.

In other words, those paper data are simply not as good as the three or two sentences of this so-called 'unnamed' authoritative figure.

It seems to be 'authoritative' and 'objective', but in fact, it tramples on the actual voting rights of all listeners to the bottom.

As a work for the public, it is not enough to be recognized by the public, and it even needs to meet the preferences and aesthetics of these judges!

Is it appropriate that even the latter should be more important than the former?

Is this reasonable?

As for the specific explanation given by the institution that Bai Ling could not win the award, it is even more nonsense.

What does it mean that Bai Ling's works do not have a positive, positive value orientation and emotional value?

Bai Ling has written so many songs since his debut, among them, aren't works such as Invisible Wings and Young Huaxia Shuo positive and positive?

Do you have to hold on to a song under the sea?

And many of Bai Ling's works are also promoting traditional culture, isn't this value-oriented?

What's even more ridiculous is that among the examples listed, the song "Torment" actually encourages a lovelorn girl to try to come out of grief and despair and welcome a new life.

Such a work is actually used as an example as a representative of the non-positive value orientation?

After watching it, many fans of Bai Ling were on the spot with a black question mark face.

How?

Is this the judges' vision and understanding of the work?

Can this also be a judge?

They can do it too!

Besides, take 10,000 steps back.

Even if the song Under the Sea can't be shortlisted for the award, why did you choose this song to be nominated in the first place?

Bai Ling's other works?

It's hard not to feel like the judging body didn't mean it.

Finally, the award for a single work can be explained by this reason, so why are the Best Newcomer Award and the Best Creation Award, which bind the singer himself rather than the work, not selected?

In short, most of Bai Ling's fans are completely unacceptable to this result.

"It's better to explain it!"

"Too many questions!"

"I can't accept that."

"It's still an insider, it's definitely an insider, it's almost a real hammer."

"yes, there's almost no possibility of washing."

There are even many people who have made a special feature on so many statements just now and posted them on the Internet, which has caused further discussion and rhetorical crusades.

It's just that this time the judging body is not so calm.

Once the relevant post appears on the Internet, it will be inexplicably reported and taken down and deleted.

The reaction and action are just fast, and the top PR team is probably no more than that.

Of course, what happened with these things was some people who didn't know if it was a troll or really felt that this explanation made sense.

"Didn't everyone give a reasonable explanation? You Bai Ling fans are still messing around! ”

"I don't think there's a problem with this explanation, it's just these songs that are nominated, and these songs are really not qualified."

"Haven't you said it all, it's not just about the number of hits and playbacks, it's not just about the number of clicks, it's not just the data that the public is vulgar, and it's really inappropriate to evaluate works of art just by looking at these."

"That's right, this matter should end here, Bai Ling's fans will be a little ugly if they continue to make trouble."

"Or else? I personally give Bai Ling's fans a face and issue an award to Bai Ling? Hahaha! ”

"It's really interesting to watch these NC fans mess around."

"Originally, I thought it was a little strange that Bai Ling didn't win the award, but after reading it, I didn't think there was anything wrong, but these fans made me uncomfortable, and the road turned black."

"I was originally a fan of Bai Ling, but now I'm a little annoying, such a big movement, Bai Ling and her studio are probably going to end up in person."

"That's it, the first time I found out that Bai Ling's public relations team was so exaggerated, I began to doubt her previous achievements."

"Yes, I feel like she's just brushing the data, that's why the judges didn't give the award!"

(End of chapter)