"I seem to ...... Know what kind of field this is! ”

Soon, Jin Bubao spoke.

And not only him, but everyone else also knows about it, because this type of field is ......

But it's quite famous!

"Rule-based field......"

Yan Yunxin nodded, and at the same time showed a solemn expression.

In every sense, this kind of field is the most troublesome, because the rules are cumbersome and complicated, and if you are not careful, your own spiritual power will be eroded and polluted!

"I remember, the last rule-type field that appeared seemed to be called ...... [Yuying Middle School]?"

At this time, Jin Buying thought about it.

"That's right."

Yan Yunxin nodded.

"That time, it was also because of the emergence of a crazy cult that caused tens of thousands of people to die in the realm and become ghost-like walking corpses, and that realm has grown to a ...... close to legendary."

Growth is the foundation of the rule-based field.

"If it weren't for the fact that things got big and attracted a legendary-level powerhouse, I'm afraid that field would have become a city-level disaster that time!"

The faces of the crowd were unusually heavy.

But......

"Okay, if you come, you will be safe, and now only we can save ourselves, in this rule-based field, waiting for rescue is unrealistic."

Yan Yunxin clapped his hands, attracting everyone's attention, and also exercised the duties of the squad leader.

"In any case, at least one thing can be confirmed, according to the experience of the previous predecessors, this rule-based field has its own peculiarities, as long as you can abide by its rules, and dig deeper behind the rules, and survive in it...... It should be fine! ”

As she spoke, she began to beckon everyone to gather around, and then studied the rules in her hand......

……

……

【1】

The first rule can be broken down into four parts:

First, there is no problem with the safety measures, and it is impossible for the animals to escape.

2. "Small herbivores" are kept in an untouchable enclosed environment.

3. If you see a rabbit running away on the side of the road, stay away immediately and report to the staff.

4. Don't go near the rabbit and don't touch the rabbit, especially if the rabbit finds it and starts approaching you at high speed.

Among them, the first part "there is no possibility for animals to escape" and the third part "rabbits running away on the side of the road" are obviously contradictory, which also shows that these "escaped rabbits" are likely to have problems.

This is also confirmed in the fourth part, which emphasizes "do not approach" and "do not touch", and also indicates that the rabbit will "find" and "move at high speeds......

Combined with the ability of the regular realm to erode and pollute spiritual power, it is not difficult to determine that this kind of "runaway rabbit" is likely to be one of the "pollution sources".

Looking at the second part, the "small herbivores" are "imprisoned" in an "untouchable enclosed environment", which obviously does not conform to normal logic.

Moreover, it refers to "small herbivores", not "rabbits", which means that there should be other animals besides "rabbits" who are also imprisoned.

At the same time, "confinement" and "untouchable enclosed environment" are clearly not like treating animals, but like treating some kind of "dangerous thing......

This also echoes the "don't approach" and "don't touch" in the fourth part, which basically determines the guess of "pollution source".

In the third part, "the rabbits that escaped" and "the staff" are the focus, and when combined with the first part, it can be shown that these rabbits are not really "escaped......

It is very likely that they appeared in other ways, but what this way is still needs to be explored.

Then there are the "staff", and it is clear that the "Tourist Code" wants visitors to trust the "staff".

At least for now, it is very likely that the "staff" can be of great help to their side, and this must be borne in mind.

Finally, there is the fourth part, which has actually been analyzed almost before.

The point is "don't approach" and "don't touch", but I don't know how high this so-called "high speed" can be.

If it's the speed at which ordinary people can't react, then maybe it's a bit troublesome.

Then the point of this one becomes "don't be discovered", huh...... It's better to do this to a safe degree.

In summary, from the first rule alone, the following information can be obtained:

1. Rabbits are dangerous and are likely to be a source of pollution.

2. In addition to rabbits, there are other dangerous animals, which may also be the source of pollution.

3. The way rabbits appear is worth exploring, which may be related to pollution.

4. Staff should be trustworthy (tentative) and able to help.

5. If you see a rabbit, try not to be spotted.

……

【2】

1. There is only one street in the ape park, and only apes are displayed.

2. If two streets are found and animals are displayed, including rabbits.

3. Choose the street on the left.

Fourth, end the visit to the park as quickly as possible.

Again, divide the second rule into four parts.

The first part, "only" and "show only", should be emphasizing what the normal situation is.

This is important in the field of rules, but it also means that there is a possibility of change.

It is very likely that the change is not an actual change, but an "illusion" that has been affected by some kind of mental power.

This also means that his spirit has been "polluted" to a certain extent, and he must find a way as soon as possible.

The second part is to describe the possible changes......

This includes "Second Street" and "Extra Rabbits".

There is no doubt that the "second street" is absolutely not to go, and the devil knows where it leads.

As for the "rabbit", it has been judged as a "pollution source" in the first rule, but since it is a "display animal", it means that it should not have "escaped", so it is likely to ignore it.

The third part is simple, when the "second street" appears, you should choose the "left" one.

This is most likely a protective measure and a correct guideline, which should be referred to as much as possible.

However, there is also a message in this, that is, it only mentions "choose the left", and does not mention "return the way you came".

This suggests that in this case, it may be safest to "move on", and there will still be dangers in returning.

The fourth section, "end the visit as quickly as possible", translates to "leave the area as quickly as possible".

This also means that at the time of the above situation, there is some unknown effect in this area, and even if you don't go down the wrong street, you need to get away as soon as possible.

And so far, the conclusion drawn under the second rule follows:

1. You should always believe in and emphasize to yourself that there are only apes in the ape zone.

2. When an abnormal situation occurs, you should decisively choose the street on the left to "move on" and quickly leave the ape area.

3. There may be "range pollution" in the ape area, which may be related to "rabbits".

4. I don't know where the extra street leads, but it is definitely inseparable from "pollution".

……

【3】

1. The elephant is a very large creature with fan ears, a long snout, and legs like pillars, and it is not white.

2. Please make sure that you only see elephants in the elephant park.

The first part, again, emphasizes proper cognition, but also mentions the third animal so far.

Considering the size, the elephant itself should be safe, as it clearly does not belong to the category of "small herbivores".

However, the last sentence "not white" is worth noting, which, combined with the previous emphasis, indicates that it is possible for elephants to mix with "white things".

And this "white thing", judging from the information obtained so far, is obviously very likely to be a "rabbit", which means that "rabbits", or "pollution", will also invade the elephant park.

The second part, the words "please make sure", is actually illogical.

As a tourist, there is no way to "ensure" that the park is free of foreign objects, and the only logical way is to take appropriate action as soon as a problem is discovered.

And what is this measure, for now, there should be no mistake in "looking for staff".

As for whether there is any other way, we can continue to do it.

Thus, the conclusion that can be drawn from the third rule follows:

1. There is also a possibility of abnormality in the elephant park, but this anomaly should not be as violent as in the ape area, because there is no emphasis on "leave as soon as possible".

2. Once an abnormality is found, it is best to take corresponding correct measures, such as: find a staff.

……

【4】

1. The zoo's beverage stores do not serve "rabbit blood".

2. If you find "rabbit blood" on the shelves, don't buy it.

It is also a typical "enhanced cognition" and "abnormal warning", since it has been confirmed that there is a problem with the "rabbit", then the "rabbit blood" is naturally also problematic.

At the same time, as a beverage store that always has "staff", this obvious abnormality still occurs, which means that the ability of "staff" is also very limited and cannot prevent the occurrence of abnormal situations.

This leads to the following conclusions:

1. Do not buy "rabbit blood", otherwise there may be danger.

2. The staff's side is not absolutely safe, and they still need to keep a clear awareness at all times.

……

【5】

1. Don't stay alone in the shade of the rabbit park.

The focus of this rule is on "alone" and "shade".

Since there is a problem with the "rabbit", the problem of the rabbit park should naturally be not small.

However, the zoo is still open for rabbits, and there are no more unusual reminders, which means that the rabbits in the park are relatively safe.

Well, looking at it now, the only problem with the rabbit park is the "shade".

The "shade" is made up of shadows, and by extension, it may be the "shadows" that are problematic.

Then there is "alone", which means that danger is likely to come only when you are alone.

On the other hand, if you stay with other people all the time, the safety factor will also increase.

Then, according to the fifth rule, it is concluded that:

1. There may be problems with the shadows in the park.

2. Being alone will increase the probability of danger.

……

【6】

1. There is no aquarium.

2. If there is a staff member who sells tickets for the aquarium, refuse them.

Again, a rule that emphasizes cognition, but this time, "staff" is mentioned.

In the previous analysis, the "staff" who were temporarily classified as "able to help" have now undergone a new change.

This change suggests that "staff" may also be affected in some way.

Conclusion:

1. Keep in mind that the "Oceanarium" does not exist.

2. Staff are not only limited in their abilities, but also have the potential to pose a hazard.

……

【7】

1. If you see the aquarium, leave immediately.

2. At the same time, call the phone number marked on the map to inform.

From this rule, it can be seen that the "aquarium" is actually possible.

However, there is a high probability that there is an unknown danger, so it is best not to get close.

At the same time, the rules also give a hint of "making a call", which is equivalent to asking a "staff member" for help.

In other words, once you see the "aquarium", even if you leave immediately, there is a high probability that the "aquarium" will still exist, and the intervention of the "staff" is required.

Conclusion:

1. The appearance of the "aquarium" may also be related to "spiritual pollution", but it may also be a dangerous building that appears randomly.

2. The "staff" in charge of the map call should be able to be trusted, and of course maintain a certain skepticism.

……

【8】

1. Don't feed rabbits.

Second, the rest of the animals are fine.

Simple and straightforward warnings that can be directly concluded:

1. Whether it is a "rabbit running away" or a "rabbit locked up in the park", it is dangerous.

2. Feeding "rabbits" is likely to cause some kind of change.

3. Other animals are much less dangerous than "rabbits", at least they can be fed.

……

【9】

1. Rabbits don't laugh.

2. If you hear laughter that is clearly not coming from the direction of the tourist while visiting the rabbit park.

3. Before leaving the rabbit park, tear off the dotted line on the map and hold it until you leave the zoo completely.

The first part is a reminder that if there is "laughter", it must not be made by a "rabbit".

And the second part of the "obviously not from the direction of tourists" indicates that the "laughter" may not be made by tourists.

Combining these two points, we can also conclude that the "laughter" is someone else, something other than "tourists" and "rabbits".

At the same time, when this being "laughs", it means that danger is coming.

This has to be reminded of the "shadow" drawn earlier, and there is no mention of rabbits either.

In other words, in the rabbit park, there is a danger that is not a "rabbit", ready to wait for an opportunity.

It is unknown what this being is, but it can be seen that it is more dangerous than the "rabbit".

Because in the third part of the "Solution", there is no mention of "staff" as before, but a new thing is mentioned - "the dotted part of the map"!

Judging from the map, there is only one dotted line, and when it is torn off, there will be no more of it.

At the same time, there is no place to provide any new maps at the entrance of the park, that is, the map is one for each person.

At the same time, in any of the previous dangerous situations, it was not allowed to tear off the "dotted part", indicating that this was not a "talisman", but a "temporary means".

In other words, the "dotted part" may be able to resist "spiritual pollution" and "resist danger", but it must be "time-sensitive"!

At the same time, it can be seen that the source of this "laughter" is likely to be in this zoo......

The most dangerous thing yet!

Conclusion:

1. The rabbit park may have the most dangerous thing in the entire zoo (emphasis added)!

2. Combined with the previous rules, this thing is likely to be hidden in the shadows.

3. The "dotted part" of the map can get people out of trouble, but they must always be held in their hands.

4. The effect of the "dotted part" is time-sensitive, and it is best to leave the zoo as soon as possible.

……

【10】

1. Committing any of the above and finding yourself in a state of getting lost or separated from other acquaintances.

2. Immediately find the nearest beverage store within a quarter of an hour and inform the salesperson in blue overalls (if you see a salesperson in black overalls, pretend not to hear anything).

3. The salesman in blue overalls will immediately take you to the working passage of the lion park, and the lion will not attack you and hide behind the rockery.

4. After all the white lions start roaring, the staff will take you out of the park, but you need to make sure that the other party's overalls are blue.

5. Family and friends will be waiting for you at the entrance of the lion park and leave the zoo immediately.

As can be seen from the first part, when you break the rules, you are likely to be "polluted", resulting in cognitive bias.

In this case, even if you don't want to, you are likely to become separated from your companions and become "alone".

And from the previous rules, it can be seen that in a zoo, "alone" is quite dangerous.

At the same time, it also shows that the "pollution" in the zoo may be the starting point of making people "detached from the crowd" and "alone".

Then comes the second part, the first key word – "a quarter of an hour".

This may mean that from the time of "breaking away from the crowd", the time to be rescued is only "a quarter of an hour".

Then there are the "salespeople in blue overalls" and "salespeople in black overalls", which also answer the previous doubts about the staff and distinguish between them.

Obviously, the "workers in blue overalls" can really help, and the "workers in black overalls" are the opposite.

The third part, the trusting "blue overalls", will take people to the lion park.

This also shows that the lion park is a solution to the problem, but it needs to be led by staff.

Lions don't attack people, probably not because of good training, but because lions are on the side of humans.

And "behind the rockery" should be a "safe zone", because "lions don't attack people", so it is obvious that they are hiding from other things.

As for what this thing is, maybe it's the "source of pollution", maybe it's the "rabbit", it's definitely not a good thing anyway.

The fourth part, "After all the white lions have started to roar", the staff will take them away, indicating that the "white lion roar" is a signal, perhaps successfully expelling or suppressing the "pollution".

Of course, "expulsion" is obviously unlikely, otherwise the zoo would not need to fix all these bells and whistles, and it should be "suppression" more likely.

Then, when being taken away, it is also necessary to pay attention to the color of the staff's clothes, which further illustrates that even the "white lion" cannot expel the pollution.

In this case, "black overalls" are still possible, and we must be vigilant.

Finally, the fifth part mentions that after being taken away by the "blue overalls", family and friends will wait at the entrance of the lion park, perhaps because there is a special notice in the park.

But there is also a possibility that after a person is "polluted", family and friends may also not be aware of his disappearance, and only when the "pollution" is "suppressed" can relatives and friends converge smoothly.

The last sentence of "leave the zoo as soon as possible" also shows that "pollution" has not really disappeared, and it may reappear at any time.

In this case, the best thing to do is to leave as soon as possible.

Conclusion:

1. In the initial stage of pollution, the polluted person is likely to leave the group automatically and will not attract the attention of family and friends.

2. There is a safe time of "a quarter of an hour" from the time of contamination, and it is necessary to find the staff as soon as possible within this time.

3. For the time being, the staff can be divided into "blue overalls" and "black overalls", with "blue overalls" providing the greatest help, while "black overalls" are the opposite.

4. The white lion in the lion park is a "friendly party", and the roar may be able to suppress the "pollution" and help the polluted get out of danger.

5. The rockery in the lion park is suspected to be a "safe area", and it may be possible to avoid the unknown.

6. You should always pay attention to the color of the staff's work clothes to avoid falling into danger again.

7. The white lion cannot completely expel the "pollution", and can only leave the zoo as soon as possible.

……

【11】

1. There are only four white lions in this park.

2. If you find more than four white lions roaring in the case of Article 10, do not leave and inform the staff.

3. Wait for the number of white lions to recover to four before leaving.

As a supplement to Rule 10, the first part of Article 11 is still "emphasizing cognition".

Then, the second part explains again that the "white lion" is also limited in its capabilities, and at the same time, there may be unknown beings mixed in, bringing new dangers to the contaminated.

"Inform the staff" should be through a reminder for the staff to deal with it, which also shows that perhaps only the contaminated can find the extra "white lions".

Obviously, the staff has the ability to restore the "white lions" to the correct number, which means that the extra "white lions" should not be very strong.

Conclusion:

1. Keep in mind that there are only four "white lions".

2. There are "unknown beings" that can be mixed into the "white lion", and only the polluted can find it.

3. The power of this "unknown existence" in the lion park is not strong, and it can be driven away, which shows that the lion park is indeed the safest among the zoo parks.

……

【12】

1. You can buy any animal merchandise for children under the age of 12, including rabbits.

2. Children aged 13-17 should discard rabbit dolls within one month after purchasing them.

3. People over the age of 18 cannot buy rabbit toys.

The twelfth rule is very easy to understand, as long as it is a person who has knowledge of "spiritual pollution".

Obviously, both "rabbits" and "rabbit toys" exist as a "source of pollution", and the most critical point of "pollution" is to break and distort a person's "inherent cognition".

It's just that before the age of twelve, human consciousness is a chaotic one, and neither the cognition of the world nor one's own three views have yet to be fully formed.

In this already chaotic state, there is no such thing as twisting or distortion, so "mental pollution" is ineffective for children under the age of twelve.

Then there is the age of thirteen to seventeen, which is the age at which all cognitions and perceptions are gradually established.

During this period, the child's cognition is in a state of change from chaos to clarity, so he still has a certain immunity to "mental pollution".

By analogy, when a person reaches adulthood, a person's perception of the world is basically formed and stable, and there is a complete and clear framework.

This is where "spiritual pollution" works best, and can bring everything back to chaos.

Conclusion:

At this point, it is completely certain that there is a powerful "spiritual pollution" in the zoo, and one of the "pollution sources" is the "rabbit"!

【13】

1. If you see someone wearing rabbit earrings following the flow of people into the elephant park, you must give up visiting the park.

2. In the event of a violation of this article, the Park shall not be responsible and shall not be able to provide a solution.

The thirteenth rule, the first part of which mentions "rabbits", is only changed to "people" who "wear rabbit earrings".

At the same time, it is also pointed out that after such people enter the "elephant park", they must give up visiting.

This shows that when the "man with rabbit earrings" and the "elephant" come together, something very scary will happen.

And the consequences of this incident are also quite terrible, completely different from before.

"No solution is available", that is, the impact may pull the "pollution level" directly to the maximum, leaving no way to resist it.

The reason why we can judge this way is because "time" is actually mentioned in the previous dangerous situations, such as "a quarter of an hour" and "before leaving the park", although there is no cure for the root cause, but there is "time to react".

Therefore, for now, the danger ranking in zoos should change again.

"Some kind of being" in the rabbit park, which was originally considered the most dangerous, was lowered by one level, and the most dangerous became "people wearing rabbit earrings outside the elephant park".

Conclusion:

In any case, the rules cannot be violated in this case!!

……

【14】

1. The Lion Park is safe.

2. If you encounter any unsolvable danger and cannot seek help, please go to the lion park immediately, by any means necessary, and by all means.

So far, I finally saw a rule that made people feel a little more at ease.

"The lion park is safe" is exactly the conclusion reached in the previous rule, and it is confirmed here.

Combined with the above, in addition to encountering the situation in the previous rule, which is likely to be unable to react, as long as there is time to react, then there is salvation.

"Immediately", "by any means", "by all means", these words are without exception proof of the safety of the lion park.

The "White Lion" is an absolute ally.

That's the conclusion of this rule!

……

【15】

1. Be wary of friends who have lost more than once with you.

Second, especially if they repeatedly advise you to go to the aquarium or elephant park.

The last rule seems to be addressed to "normal people".

As already analyzed, "detachment from the crowd" and "being alone" are likely to be the manifestations of "the initial stage of pollution", so friends who have "been lost more than once" are also likely to have been polluted.

In the second part, it is mentioned that the polluted person is likely to do two things:

First, I advise you to go to the aquarium.

Second, I advise you to go to the elephant park.

First of all, it is actually very understandable to advise you to go to an aquarium, because it can already be seen in the previous rules that "aquarium" is likely to be synonymous with "polluted".

It doesn't exist in the first place, but it can be seen, and there are "staff" who will sell tickets, but they must refuse, which means that both the "staff" who sell the tickets and the people who see the "aquarium" themselves are no longer "normal".

In this way, if a person is really dragged to the "aquarium", most of them will also be "polluted".

Of course, there is no mention of what the consequences will be after seeing the aquarium or even entering, but from the previous rules, there should still be salvation.

But the second behavior, which pulls you to the elephant park, is a little intriguing.

Because it is not said that there is any danger of entering the elephant park "normally", it is just to "make sure" that the elephant you see is real.

At present, there is only one danger that will appear in the elephant park, and that is to see "people wearing rabbit earrings" in the flow of people entering the park.

But this situation is actually easy to avoid, and that is to pay attention to whether such a person exists before entering.

In such a situation, it is also necessary to be wary of the advice of "friends", which can only tell one story......

That is, once you follow this "friend", it is very likely that the most serious situation will happen!

This means that this "friend" of yours is likely to be the "person with rabbit earrings" in the eyes of others, and you yourself will not be able to notice it.

At the same time, it also shows that when your lost "friend" reappears and offers you such persuasion, you are also "polluted"!

Conclusion:

1. Be wary of friends who have been separated more than once.

2. After people are "polluted", they are likely to become "people wearing rabbit earrings"!

……

At this point, the fifteen rules on the Tourist Code have been fully analyzed.

Everyone in the top class is becoming more and more aware of ......

This rule-like realm of horror......

It's hell!

(End of chapter)