Recently, there has been some controversy about the plot of the king.

It mainly revolves around the fact that the first emperor broke his own principles and undermined the great unification.

In response to this controversy, let's talk about the unification.

As I have been trying to express before, first of all, the First Emperor was never a believer in Legalism, and I have been expressing this point of view over and over again.

The First Emperor had only one purpose.

Strengthen centralization.

The personal will of the First Emperor is not changed by the sons of the hundred schools, on the contrary, who is more in line with the will of the First Emperor, and the First Emperor will choose whom.

Then let's talk about unification.

Before talking about great unification, we must clearly recognize one thing, great unification and centralization are not the same thing.

The First Emperor was committed to centralization, not unification.

These are two separate concepts, and it's not that I'm confusing them or distorting them.

It's just that the two are too similar......

Seriously, the protagonist is the real supporter of the concept of unification.

The First Emperor used great unification to serve the centralization of power.

The protagonist is to use centralized power to serve the great unification.

With these things out of the blue, let's discuss the matter of the First Emperor making an exception to divide the feuds.

I have been emphasizing, including the First Emperor, that this is an isolated case, that is, during the reign of the First Emperor, there can be no second king.

Then we will discuss why the protagonist is king.

According to the traditional concept of the first emperor, he couldn't survive his son.

And his own son conflicts with his own political views, and his grandson conforms to his own political views.

In other words, between his own son and his grandson, in fact, political opinions are also-for-tat.

So the question is, if the first emperor dies, will Fusu and the protagonist, two father and son with different political views and not very close, be coerced by the will of their subordinates and fall into a fight?

It's actually obvious.

Can the First Emperor interfere in what happens after his death?

Then there is only one path in front of the First Emperor.

Marginalize the son, and constantly emphasize the authority of the protagonist.

Force can be used without it, but it cannot be without, because it is the most powerful guarantee.

And only when the protagonist succeeds to the throne smoothly, the will of the first emperor can be successfully inherited.

By the way, let's tell a little story about the two dynasties and compare them.

Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty killed the crown prince Liu Ju, and in his later years regretted it very much, thinking that he had done something wrong.

However, Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty did not change the title of Prince Liu Zhier until his death.

After the death of Emperor Wu of the Han Dynasty, Huo Guang took charge of the government.

Huo Guang also regretted Liu Ju's death, and also thought that Liu Ju was right, but Huo Guang did not change the name of Prince Liu Ju'er.

Why do they all think that they have done something wrong, and there is still no official change of the nickname to admit their mistakes?

After all, Liu Ju is dead, and changing his nickname doesn't seem to have any effect.

If you are still in doubt, you might as well take a look at the Ming Dynasty.

Zhang Juzheng, a powerful minister of the Ming Dynasty, was the real life-changer of the Ming Dynasty.

After Zhang Juzheng's death, the Wanli Emperor raided his home and launched a political counteroffensive against Zhang Juzheng's party.

From this time, the fall of the Ming Dynasty was no longer unstoppable.

Zhang Juzheng is dead, why can the counteroffensive and liquidation against him still affect the national fortunes of the Ming Dynasty?

Therefore, the inheritance of political will is of great importance.

So what are the facts that lie before the First Emperor?

If his political will cannot be inherited, everything he does will be useless.

However, after decades of gloriousness, as soon as he died, he returned to dust.

Therefore, for the First Emperor, it is extremely important to ensure that the protagonist can inherit his will.

Therefore, there is an exception to be crowned king.

Although an exception is made, it is indeed an isolated case, and it is only one case that the ministers are agreed upon.

So, if Zhao Si succeeds to the throne, Zhao Guo, will Zhao Si still pass it on to his son?

After the protagonist succeeds to the throne, his heir should inherit Daqin, not Zhao.

Could it be that Zhao Si has nothing to do and set up two princes?

An inheritance of the Qin State? An inheritance of the Zhao State?

A single chapter explains these questions.

What the First Emperor did did not violate his will to centralize power.

On the contrary, this is the embodiment of his personal will.

He's the First Emperor!

How could he not think of perpetuating his will.

It is precisely because this is what he believes that he will set it for his lifetime, and he will die.

Even after his death, no one will be able to reverse his will.

It's probably the sauce purple horn......

Also, let's explain about the update.

In fact, readers in the readership should know that March is not a full-time book.

Although the profession is relatively free, it is really busy to be busy.

Now I'm torn between quitting and not quitting.

The main reason is that the salary is expensive, and the second is because at the beginning of the entry, I was introduced by a friend, and everyone is familiar with each other, so I can't wipe this face, and I am embarrassed to leave before I finish it.

It's still hesitating......

Mainly write books full-time...... Alas......