In the process, the revivalist Wang Letian also felt the changes in society.

Although the incident of his home being splashed with paint brought him some trouble and damage, it also made him more determined to promote Hanfu culture.

He believes that as long as everyone works together, Hanfu culture will be able to carry forward in modern society.

On the streets of Zhongzhou today, young people wearing Hanfu have become a beautiful landscape.

They interpret the love and inheritance of traditional culture with their own actions, and also show the self-confidence and pride of the Chinese nation in their own way.

And those who used to have prejudices and misunderstandings about Hanfu culture are gradually changing their minds and joining this big family.

……

With the rise of "Tang Poetry and Song Ci" and "Han Family World".

The charm of Hanfu blows like a spring breeze in the entire cultural circle.

People are attracted by the flowing clothes and delicate ornaments, as if they have returned to that poetic ancient time.

However, the success of these two studios has also attracted a lot of envy and jealousy.

Soon, all kinds of Hanfu exhibitions sprung up in various places.

Among them, a pretentious "national style studio" is particularly eye-catching.

They not only displayed Hanfu, but also integrated Yuanqing costumes, kimonos, hanbok and other clothing elements into it, which is called "national style integration".

The move immediately caused widespread controversy.

Many people believe that this is a desecration of Hanfu and a disrespect for traditional culture.

They took to social media to express their frustration and anger.

"Where is this Hanfu Exhibition? It's a hodgepodge! A netizen wrote indignantly.

"Kimono and hanbok can also be regarded as national style? It's a joke! Another netizen chimed in.

In the face of doubts and criticism from the outside world, Zhang Yiyi, the female boss of Guofeng Studio, seemed unusually calm.

She made a public statement, saying that the original intention of her studio was to create an inclusive national style platform, not limited to Hanfu, but to cover all clothing with oriental aesthetics.

"What we do is not a single Hanfu, but the entire national style." Zhang Yiyi emphasized in the statement, "Kimono, Hanbok and other clothing are also an important part of Oriental culture, they also carry a profound historical and cultural heritage, and their inclusion in the category of national style is a more comprehensive presentation of Oriental culture." ”

This remark exploded on the Internet in an instant, and a large number of discussions and arguments emerged on major social platforms.

People are standing in line and expressing their opinions,

For a while, there was smoke on the Internet.

"Zhang Yiyi said this beautifully!" One supporter commented on Weibo, "It's long overdue for someone to stand up and break those stereotypes, Hanfu is beautiful, but why can't it include elements of kimono and hanbok?" This is the real fusion of oriental aesthetics! ”

Under this comment, someone quickly replied:

"You're wrong! The reason why Hanfu is precious is that it is pure and unique, if you add everything to it, is it still Hanfu? Don't forget, our traditional culture has a bottom line! ”

Not to be outdone, another supporter responded: "The bottom line? What's the bottom line? Culture is originally meant to be exchanged and integrated, and clinging to the defects will only make the traditional culture decline more and more, Zhang Yiyi's approach is to make the national style really come alive! ”

In the camp of opponents, a senior Hanfu lover published a long rebuttal:

"Those of you who support Zhang Yiyi, do you know what cultural inheritance is? Hanfu is not a simple clothes, it has a deep history and cultural heritage behind it, although kimono and hanbok also have their characteristics, but they are not the same thing as Hanfu at all, Zhang Yiyi is so confused, it is simply disrespectful to traditional culture! ”

This long article immediately aroused heated discussions, some people liked and supported, and some people left messages to refute: "You are right, but the times are changing, and culture must keep pace with the times, Zhang Yiyi's proposal may be a little radical, but at least she dares to try and innovate, which is better than those who can only stick to the rules, right?" ”

The two sides come and go, arguing endlessly.

This online debate not only attracted the participation of many netizens, but also attracted the attention of the media and experts.

Some media outlets published opinion pieces pointing out:

"Although Zhang Yiyi's remarks have caused controversy, they also reflect the current difficulties and challenges faced by the inheritance and development of traditional culture, and how to achieve innovation and development while maintaining the purity of traditional culture is a problem that we need to think deeply about."

The debate dragged on for several days and did not reach a definitive conclusion.

But in any case, this debate has made people pay more attention to and think about the inheritance and development of traditional culture.

Perhaps, as one netizen said: "No matter what the result is, at least we are working hard for the future of traditional culture." ”

Emotions on both sides of the argument were unusually high.

Zhang Yiyi's statements and remarks have been pushed to the forefront.

Rather than back down from the initial controversy, she chose to elaborate her point in greater depth.

She has published a number of long essays, from historical origins, cultural inheritance to artistic aesthetics, and comprehensively analyzes the internal connections and commonalities between kimono, hanbok and hanbok.

In the first long article, Zhang Yiyi began with a clear meaning: "Hanfu, as a treasure of Chinese culture, its unique beauty is undoubted, but in the same way, kimono and hanbok also carry the history and culture of their respective nations. ”

She went on to quote the records in the Book of Han, pointing out that there were frequent cultural exchanges between East Asian countries in ancient times, and that Hanfu, kimono, and hanbok all had traces of mutual influence in style and ornamentation.

She wrote: "History is the best witness, as early as a thousand years ago, our ancestors have begun cultural exchanges and integration, the cloud pattern on the Hanfu, the cherry blossoms on the kimono, and the crane on the Hanbok are all imprints of cultural integration." ”

In the comment area of the long article, a netizen questioned:

"Zhang Yiyi, you said it easily, but the integration of culture is not a simple 1+1=2, the reason why Hanfu is Hanfu lies in its uniqueness and purity, you do this, isn't it erasing the uniqueness of Hanfu?"

Zhang Yiyi quickly responded: "I understand your concerns, but what I want to say is that the integration of cultures is not to erase, but to enhance and enrich, Hanfu can learn from the elements of kimono and hanbok to become more diverse and inclusive, and at the same time, kimono and hanbok can also draw inspiration from Hanfu, which is a win-win situation." ”

Another veteran Hanfu enthusiast joined the discussion: "What you say makes sense, but I think that in the process of integration, we must maintain awe and respect for traditional culture, and we must not lose our cultural roots in order to cater to the trend." ”