Ask for a monthly pass and say something
It's a long time, and the two beasts are actually asking for a monthly pass!
Actually, I'll open a single chapter and try it.
Since the book was opened, I have never asked for anything other than subscriptions, including recommendation tickets, monthly passes, etc., and I used to say thank you to readers for recommending tickets and monthly passes.
Some books you don't update, write a chapter every two or three days, and readers still vote. Some books have better grades than mine, more than me, and monthly passes are lower than mine. Of course, it may be that he writes longer and reads less. So these things are actually quite empty. It's all up to the reader.
I'm just going to see if any readers vote for me on a whim. (funny)
As I write now, I summarize the reader's question.
There are two main problems, the first is the timeline I wrote earlier, and I explained a lot to the reader before. But now that I look back on myself, I can't help but sigh that there is still an old saying that is called the authorities are obsessed.
I was in a state of high mood when I was writing, and it was easy to get into a state of self-congratulation, the kind of state that I wanted to pour out the inspiration in my heart. It's easy to get into this state of writing, because writing a book is a thing full of emotion, not a simple move of your fingers, and if you don't have emotion, you can't give emotions to the characters in the book.
It's not terrible to be self-congratulatory, but if you have enough foreshadowing, then it is logical, and the correct way to do it is to wait for hundreds of thousands of words, and then write with enough foreshadowing. In this way, the sense of separation is not too heavy.
There is also a question about the characters in the book.
It's no wonder that all the readers have opinions about my characterization are collected.
My depiction of the characters is extreme.
For example, "Shinichi Kudo isn't good, but he's not like that." "These kinds of comments.
All the words that say that the characters are poisonous are based on my writing technique.
Why do I write this, because this is the royal way of writing online articles. All the character settings should be written around the position of the protagonist. Note that it is the protagonist who stands. Whether it's a fan or an original, it has to be written like this.
Since Shinichi Kudo is the clear opposite of the protagonist, do I need to describe what he is good about? Am I going to describe how good his reasoning is? Need to portray his calm, witty and resolute side?
No, because he's the opposite of the main character, I just need to make the reader hate him.
So some people say that I let the protagonist step on this and that, and I won't write anything if I don't step on it...... I'm sorry, but the author's description of the characters in the book depends on the protagonist's position.
In the same way, Xiao Ai is the protagonist's friend, so do I need to depict her nasty side? Of course not, I should try my best to make the reader like her. So I actually added some more settings to this character at the beginning, such as the setting of "Doraemon", for example, she can skillfully recite the law from the beginning, these all-round attributes are written so that readers do not reject this "friendly character".
Including later, if a Black character becomes the protagonist's ally, then I won't write about the unlikable things about the character, or the things that might trap the protagonist, I will only try to write about the things that will make the reader like the character.
And if there is a character who becomes the opposite of the protagonist, even if it is Akai Amuro or the like (just an analogy), it is the same.
What is the character's position on the protagonist, I will describe him in a corresponding way. It's not that I particularly like or hate a particular character, it's just that I write about the main character's position.
Because my way of writing is more prominent in the characters, especially the opposite of the protagonist, because I don't write or write less about the advantages of these characters, it looks extreme.
But this is the royal way of writing, those who describe "respectable opponents" and the like, are actually very unsuitable for the genre of online articles.
Of course, this kind of writing is easy to blacken the author.
Especially the same people.,Some readers come to the book with their views on the original characters.,He doesn't care what the protagonist's position is.,He just thinks that a certain character should be black and white.。
I can only say that I am writing characters in accordance with the popular writing style of online articles.
Actually, if you go to see those Conan's fire fandoms, as long as they write some grades, there are few who don't step on Kudo Shinichi, such as the coroner and the like. There is a basic logic of online articles, there is no way to highlight the protagonist without stepping on it.
Writing books and reading books are two different concepts, and I have learned a lot of things before and suffered a lot of losses. It's all blood and tears.
I really can't satisfy everyone, I can only satisfy some people.
The poison point is not poisonous, in fact, the biggest problem with online articles should be the blandness of the writing.
The so-called looking at the mountains does not like the flat, and the article is bland is the biggest poison.
Don't look at this book, I seem to have good grades - just kidding, it's much better than I used to be, but it's not easy for me to write, and the most difficult thing is this protagonist, I often stop and think for a long time because of what the protagonist should say and how to speak.
How hard is this character to write?
Li Gouhi is a TV series from 2010, and now it's 2023. How many years have elapsed between them?
I don't believe that no one has written about this subject before, or tried to think about it. But why is it that no one writes, and it's my turn as a newcomer to write? (This number is pure newcomer, and there is no popular book)
There were many people who said that I was popular, and all kinds of people said that I didn't write the character of Gu Meimen. But I just want to ask them, have you ever thought about my question?
In 2010, no one wrote the drama, and it was my turn to write it. It could only be hard to write, not easy to write, right?
I don't dare to say how good the protagonist I wrote is, but at least I'm seriously shaping him, and I'm not scribbling.
The characters are the main thing, and then there's the plot, so you have to have a passable script, right? Invert the elements to consider, right? Debates in courtroom should be highlighted, right?
How much effort I put in, only the author knows how difficult it is.
I pay a lot of attention to reviews, and whenever there is a comment that vents his emotions about the author, I will feel uncomfortable while banning him (funny), but now I am too lazy to read book reviews, I always read this chapter and say that it is the most true.
I'm trying to conceive the story I want to write, and I want readers to understand and accept the author's story.
Late at night, forgive me.
(End of chapter)