Maybe it was because Li Chen's words made him recognize the problem clearly, so he became so sad.

In the live broadcast room, netizens who love to work hard also began to enlighten:

"Brother, let's get a divorce, I'll introduce my cousin from my hometown to you."

"Where there is no grass at the end of the world, why do you want to love a melon?"

"Divorce, we have your back."

Seeing him like this, Li Chen also slowed down his attitude and prepared to disconnect from him: "This is a multiple-choice question, and the right to choose still lies with you."

Should you choose to face the problem head-on, or continue to avoid self-hypnosis and pretend not to see, and think about it yourself. ”

Looking at the live broadcast room, the contradictory point began again.

Seeing this, Li Chen also continued to enlighten the question: "Actually, I have talked about this issue a long time ago, and it is not unique to women.

As for the status of women in ancient times, what three wives and four concubines, that is only available in large families, isn't it, provided that you have the ability to raise it. ”

Li Chen pushed his glasses: "Let's all not dwell on this issue, as long as we can polish our eyes when we are in love, we can refuse this question." ”

After speaking, he glanced at the time again: 21:32

I can also tell a case.

"I'm telling you a case.

said that one day, Zhang San and Ma Wu went to the lotus pond to fry fish, and they also bought all kinds of torpedoes and firecrackers.

came to the lotus pond, and happened to meet Li Si who was bathing in Hanoi, so I thought about playing tricks on this Li Si.

Zhang San and Ma Wu threw firecrackers into the water at the same time, and the firecrackers only rang off after being thrown into the water.

And coincidentally, this Li Si had a heart attack and was scared to death by the sound of firecrackers.

Excuse me, who should bear the due criminal responsibility for Li Si's death? ”

After speaking, Li Chen looked at the barrage in the live broadcast room:

"This matter is definitely not the responsibility of the third brother, my third brother has never taken criminal responsibility for murder."

"Zhang San: What does Ma Wugan have to do with me?"

"Zhang San: I, Zhang San, swear to the sky, it was Ma Wu who did it!"

"Ma Wu: Third brother, you can resist this matter, I can't bear it..."

"Extralegal fanatic Zhang San: I did it, I had a heart attack and went to bathe in the river and hit the street!"

"Extralegal fanatic Zhang San: This is what I did, come and arrest me."

Li Chen also leaked his smile when he saw the barrage: "It seems that everyone trusts this Zhang San more and thinks that it is not his firecrackers that are going off."

Let's start with the case.

Zhang San and Ma Wu threw firecrackers into the lotus pond to kill Li Si? No, they just wanted to play tricks on this Li Si.

But the result?

Li Si was scared to death because of the firecrackers of the two of them, which is called negligence causing death and is a joint crime.

And Zhang San also found a lawyer to defend himself, and his defense opinion is very interesting:

Judging from the eyewitnesses at the scene and the actual situation, although Zhang San and Ma Wu both threw firecrackers into the river, the firecrackers only rang off once, so they can no longer be joint crimes, but individual negligence.

Personal negligence has to be verified whose firecrackers are going off and whose firecrackers are not sounding, how can this be verified? ”

Li Chen showed his smile: "Do you throw firecrackers into the river again?"

Zhang San threw a Ma Wu and threw one to see who was ringing and who was not, this kind of logic cannot be deduced, and the conclusions drawn cannot be the result at that time.

You said that Ma Wu's ringing this time Zhang San's didn't sound, what if the firecracker sounded was Zhang San's?

And if the firecrackers of both of them go off or if they both go off, how do you determine who is the murderer?

When the perpetrator cannot be determined and there is no direct evidence, the result can only be given according to the suspicion of guilt, which is exclusively for civil liability. ”

In the live broadcast room, netizens also started their own comments:

"Poor Li Si, he died in vain again..."

"Zhang San: I said I didn't kill someone, you said I killed someone, what about the evidence?"

"Li Si: Fire prevention, anti-theft and anti-Zhang San..."

"Li Si: I take personal practice as an example, and I must stay away from Zhang San."

"And what if the two of them fold together?"

Seeing this comment, Li Chen also showed his own smile: "The most critical factor in this problem is that the firecracker sounded, and the lawyer also used this to defend Zhang San's innocence, because there is no way to verify the firecracker that exploded in the water."

But from our point of view, both of them threw firecrackers into the water, and Li Si was also scared to death because of firecrackers.

As for how many firecrackers went off and who didn't, it is not possible to prove from the point of view that it is not a crime of contributory negligence.

Is it possible that the sound of firecrackers between the two was folded together?

The probability is not large, and it does not mean that there is no chance, just verify that the sound of firecrackers is folded together.

Can this be verified?

It is also impossible to verify.

So from the perspective of the victim's family, is it important to have one or two sounds?

It doesn't matter that much, because he was scared to death by firecrackers, unless you can verify that it wasn't the firecracker sound folding.

Therefore, it can still be held accountable as a joint crime. ”

The netizens in the live broadcast room completely exploded when they saw this reply:

"So? The third brother was arrested? ”

"Evil, my third brother's reputation was ruined by firecrackers."

"Lawyer Li, an extrajudicial fanatic: You say Zhang San is not guilty? I'm going to send him in. ”

"The truth, it turns out that the anchor is the real outlaw fanatic!"

"Li Chen: You finally found out (funny)"

"Big event, it turns out that the real reason for Zhang San's lawlessness turned out to be ......"

Li Chen pushed his glasses: "Whether a case can be held accountable depends on the evidence.

If the evidence is complete, no one can escape the punishment of the law, and if the evidence is incomplete, everyone can be an extralegal fanatic.

And in this case, the final result is still not guilty.

From a factual point of view, no one saw Zhang San and Ma Wu throw firecrackers into the river, and that sound may not be theirs.

The murder requires the identification of the murder weapon, and the murder weapons of the two of them cannot be proven.

Can the firecrackers in Hanoi prove to be theirs? It could also be someone else's.

Therefore, I often tell you that finding a good lawyer is the best way to solve the problem, because they will stand on the legal point of view to defend everyone's rights. ”

After glancing at the time again, I also had the idea of going down, so I thought about advertising myself: "As a lawyer, I will also take cases that I am interested in, and the fees are the same as most lawyers."

Of course, if my family is in difficulty, I can also defend my rights for free. ”

Li Chen showed his smile: "Okay, that's all for today's live broadcast of law popularization, tomorrow at eight o'clock in the evening, we will see you or leave." ”

After speaking, Li Chen turned off the live broadcast and glanced at his background attention.

At the moment, the number of his fans has reached more than 20 million...

(End of chapter)