185. Opposing lawyer: I just said a few words, you want to send me in?
"Presiding Judge, I would like to interrupt the other party's speech."
Hearing the other party's endless talk of feelings, Li Chen, who was pressed in the position of defender, could no longer hold back the anger in his heart.
It's not fair.
I want to speak, but you don't let me say, why can he be there and talk endlessly?
Judge Chen was stunned when he heard this, looked at Li Chen in the defender's seat and asked, "What is your reason for interrupting the other party?" ”
"There are three reasons, the first is that the other party's speech is not accurate."
Li Chen opened his mouth to explain: "The focus of this trial is about Wang Jiaxin's crime, which is intentional homicide and not intentional smearing.
In another case, what Wang Jiaxin was afraid of was a result obtained through the feedback of the people around him, and there was a real situation, not a malicious smear.
What I want to say here is that the vast majority of peasants are simple, but we cannot guarantee that 100% of the peasants are simple, there are always such a small number of people who have ruined the image of our peasants and simple, and it just so happens that this small number of people have met their friends, and they mistakenly think that the vast majority of people are like this.
And the farmers in Wang Jiaxin's mouth are difficult, referring to the small number of people, they are difficult, not all of them.
And this small number of people, not only farmers, but all walks of life will exist.
Up to our law enforcement, down to our lowest level, there will be.
And to meet such a person, and thus negate the entire industry, then from a personal point of view, I think there is no problem. ”
Speaking of this, Li Chen looked around with a serious expression: "You can take the most common school incident as an example.
Zhang San was bullied at school, the teachers at the school ignored him, Zhang San had no way to find a way, which led to a boredom of learning, he thought that every school and every teacher was like this, this is his personal opinion, just representing his personal thoughts, I think there is no problem.
And changing his opinion is very simple, that is, to find a good school again, so that he can see that the teacher is not like this.
Here, Wang Jiaxin thinks that it is difficult, this is his motive for killing, we can only think that his ideas are a little excessive, but we cannot deny his idea of his existence.
Wang Jiaxin said that farmers are difficult to break the law, first, he did not publicize his ideas everywhere, and second, he did not have a specific performance, but only his own opinion, the source of his ideas is the school, that is to say, he is not the only one who thinks that farmers are difficult, but the people around him think so.
This is a very terrible thing, the students in the school all carry this kind of thinking, and it is difficult to guarantee that they will be the next Wang Jiaxin.
So I raised the question about the school in my argument, and there was nothing wrong with that. ”
"The second point is that the lawyer's speech is to take advantage of social antagonism to achieve his own goals.
In the other party's speech, he more than once raised the words that the peasants were difficult, in fact, this is the opposite of a society, and it is a truth that he hates the rich with the poor.
What is his purpose?
First, he wanted Wang Jiaxin to be executed.
I don't have too much defense for Wang Jiaxin's behavior, because no matter what the reason and reason, he is intentionally killing people, which is a fact that cannot be changed, and there is no need to say anything more.
Article 234 of the Criminal Law: [Crime of Intentional Injury] Whoever intentionally harms the body of another person shall be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release.
Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph, causing serious injury, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years; Whoever causes death or seriously injures a person by especially cruel means, causing serious disability, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years, life imprisonment, or death.
And Wang Jiaxin is an intentional homicide after causing minor injuries in a traffic accident, and the circumstances are heinous, because the influence he brings to society is huge, and it is basically a death sentence.
The other party did not convict Wang Jiaxin according to the description of the criminal law, but continued to take advantage of the peasants' hardship and misery to win the sympathy of the society.
A lawyer who only knows how to use the focus of contradictions to create contradictions in order to achieve his own goals must be immoral. ”
Hearing Li Chen say this, the lawyer on the other side couldn't help but interject: "Isn't there anything wrong with what I said, shouldn't we say that our victim's child has lost his mother's love at such a young age?" ”
"Presiding Judge, I would like to remind you that the other party interrupting my speech without reason is a serious contempt of court and the presiding judge's behavior, and I suggest that this kind of lawyer who has no morals and does not understand any discipline be expelled from the courtroom!"
Hearing the opposing lawyer's opening to interrupt his speech, Li Chen ignored his question, but looked at the collegial panel members in charge of the trial.
Hearing this, Judge Chen said with a serious face: "Plaintiff lawyer, this is the second time that the presiding judge has reminded you to pay attention to court discipline, and if there is a next time, the presiding judge will invite you out of the courtroom." ”
"Go ahead and speak."
After speaking, Judge Chen looked at Li Chen, and had no idea of continuing to stop him from speaking.
"Thank you, Presiding Judge."
Hearing this, Li Chen continued to speak: "I will now answer the question raised by the opposing lawyer just now.
The issue of the other party's words is related to compensation.
The child has lost his parents, and as the perpetrator of the attack, he should be compensated.
You attach a civil offense, don't you just want to lose money, you can make demands according to the law, such as funeral expenses, mental damage expenses and child support, etc., which can be proposed as a civil subject, and it does not mean that you are afraid that Wang Jiaxin will be sentenced to probation if you ask for money, because the compensation you said is not a letter of understanding, but the compensation you should get, and he and the judgment are two different contents.
And Wang Jiaxin's behavior, he violated the criminal law, and he will also be punished by the law, not by a lawyer.
And can your words and deeds be regarded as another threat to the presiding judge?
Are you worried that if you want money, Wang Jiaxin will be sentenced to probation, won't it affect the normal verdict of the court?
As for the fact that you have repeatedly emphasized the difficult problems of the peasants, the real purpose of your argument is not to speak for the refugees, but only to achieve your personal goals, which is also the third point I want to make, that is, the lawyer of the other side has broken the law.
On the basis of article 278 of the Criminal Law, those who incite the masses to violently resist the implementation of state laws or administrative regulations are to be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention, controlled release, or deprivation of political rights.
In the process of expressing his opinions, the other party did not have a clear position, he was not speaking for the peasants, but just wanted to win his own lawsuit, influence the normal trial procedure, and let Wang Jiaxin be sentenced to death.
Second, in the course of his conversation, he kept his eyes on the people who came to hear the trial, just to arouse their emotions and increase the antagonism of society through his remarks.
And this trial, which was broadcast live on the Internet, had a huge impact, and his behavior was serious.
In summary, the opposing party's lawyer is not qualified to continue to sit in the position of the plaintiff's agent ad litem. ”
After speaking, Li Chen lowered his head again to sort out the reply, and the opposing lawyer completely exploded after listening to his speech.
Good guy, you're going to send me in first because I said a few more words?
Get used to it, you can code words
(End of chapter)