208. On the true definition of theft

"Is it useful to call the police?"

"It's useless, it doesn't matter if you report a small matter, but it's difficult to report a big thing."

"It's obviously the other party's problem, isn't it because there is no way to move it?"

"Ignoring his own crimes, why did you come to the door and beat someone? (Funny)"

"Didn't he just steal a little hammer from you? (Funny)"

The atmosphere in the live broadcast room is very bad, and the main source is the inappropriate encounter in reality.

Small problem alarm does not meet the criteria for filing a case, big problem...

Big question...

First, second, and third, and in the end, there was no accurate answer.

"Lawyer Li, can you please contact me!"

Netizens began to brush up gifts, hoping to get the opportunity to connect with the microphone.

Li Chen also noticed this netizen and connected with him.

"Hello Lawyer Li."

The male netizen was more polite, and Li Chen asked with some concern: "Do you have anything urgent?" ”

"I have something to say.

I started watching your live broadcast very early, probably from the case of spraying pesticides you talked about, do you remember? ”

Li Chen nodded when he heard this, and said, "Are you talking about Zhang San's case of spraying pesticides to prevent thieves?" ”

"Yes, yes, that's where I watched."

The male netizen said with some excitement when he heard this: "At that time, after listening to your content, the whole person was not good.

Look at it, Zhang San's approach, spraying pesticides on the fruit, on the other hand, isn't it also a helpless way?

From the fact analysis, Zhang San's fruit has been stolen, and he has no way to solve this problem, because it is useless for you to call the police for something like this, and people will not file a case for you to investigate because others have stolen your fruit.

He said that the amount of pesticides he sprayed was greater than that of normal pesticides, but his purpose was not to harm people?

The fruit trees he planted set up a sign to tell others not to steal it, they had to come and steal it, why should Zhang San pay for it?

In other words, if those people hadn't come in and stole food, they wouldn't have died, would they?

Why ignore their own crimes, they are thieves! ”

The male netizen was a little emotional: "I'm sorry, lawyer Li, I'm a little too aggressive."

What I really want to say is that it is obviously their fault party, the chain reaction caused by their misconduct, and they deserve it, but now, because they have done misconduct, others have no way to be forced to deal with it, but they have become the wrong party, is this fair?

The meaning of the existence of the law itself is to protect natural persons, not thieves or thieves, isn't it?

You are like the online burglary, the thief was injured by the head of the household, and he demanded compensation from the head of the house.

Two days ago, the loquat incident, the male sanitation worker took the crime tool to steal the loquat, was beaten up, and was put on the Internet, but the group of netizens actually exported the crusade against the head of the loquat household, what is the matter with people working so hard to give him food?

I really don't understand, does his hard work have anything to do with others?

Because your job is hard, can you ignore his own crimes and thus morally kidnap?

Why not consider other points?

For example, why is the head of the household so angry, and is it the first time that the male sanitation worker is so skilled in his tools of crime? ”

"I'm sorry, Mr. Li, I'm still a little emotional because I'm the owner of that house.

I really don't understand, it's obvious that someone else has stolen my things again and again, I called the police and didn't file a case, but just caught the person who stole the things, so I didn't control my emotions and hit him, I also admit that it was my fault, to the point that I don't approve of my experience and situation.

Obviously someone else stole my things, but just because he was a sanitation worker, I became the party at fault, and others could attack me brainlessly.

I'm the one who was assaulted, someone else stole my things, and I really ignored his own crimes, right?

Does his sanitation worker's hard work have anything to do with me, is he unpaid or what?

Just because he is a sanitation worker, can he infringe on the interests of others and trample on the dignity of the law at will? ”

The male netizen was still a little angry: "I hit the sanitation worker, that's my fault, there will be the police to deal with my problem, what does it have to do with them?"

Casual human flesh and others, always standing on the moral high ground, why? ”

After hearing this, Li Chen was silent for a while before he spoke: "Your question is a very complicated question, and it contains more than one side.

The first is the criteria for filing a case of theft.

Where public or private property is stolen and the amount is relatively large, the organs of the Armed Forces Association shall file a case for investigation. Where the value of public or private property is 1,000 to 3,000 RMB or more, it shall be "found to be a relatively large amount", and the specific determination is to vary according to the local economic situation.

Regarding theft, the most controversial thing is whether his value can meet the standard of filing a case, which many people say cannot be figured out.

You say that the price does not meet the standard of filing a case, and there is no way to file a case, and you say that the point of thinking is wrong from the beginning.

There is a word about theft, which is also a way of saying that the amount is not enough to make up the amount.

Here's an example.

Zhang San is a very shrewd thief, he knows the criminal law very well, knows a clear definition of theft, and the value of each crime will not exceed the standard for filing a case.

What are the criteria for filing a case?

The criminal law stipulates that the standard for theft is more than 1,000 yuan before a case can be filed and sentenced, and Zhang San steals 200 yuan every time he goes in.

At first, he was still scared, afraid that his affairs would be exposed, but after a week, no one pursued his problem, and he began to steal a second time.

The second time, he went to the house again, stole 200 yuan and left.

The second was fine, and there was a third and fourth time, and the head of the household finally couldn't help but call the police because of the more and more money stolen.

As for Zhang San, in the end, he was punished by the law because of the number of crimes and the large amount of cumulative theft. ”

After speaking, Li Chen was stunned for a while before continuing to answer: "Many people don't understand, saying why I would tell such a case."

In fact, I just want to tell you about the definition of criminal law and the correct understanding of theft.

The vast majority of people, because the amount of money they have been stolen is not much, think that the law enforcement unit will endure it if it does not file a case, and this kind of thinking itself is wrong.

There are many types of theft, and the corresponding legal measures for outdoor and burglary are also different, both in terms of amount and nature, burglary is much larger than outdoor theft. ”

"The criminal law's criteria for filing a case of theft are not only limited to the value generated by the theft itself, but also the number of cases that can be filed."

"Like I said before, is stealing money only a theft?"

(End of chapter)