"It's up to you."

Li Chen saw that he was so determined, and he didn't continue to entangle with him too much: "As long as you can have enough evidence to prove that he knows, it will not constitute the crime you said." ”

If theft doesn't work, there are other problems involved.

Intermediaries...

The charges are still so much, and they are unwilling to return the money, they can always arrange a crime.

For example, illegal possession, organized...

It's even more interesting.

There must be more than one person who can do such a business...

Obviously, this netizen has not realized the seriousness of the problem, and only feels that he is still reasonable.

If you are open and transparent about the fees, and you are willing to give money, then there is no problem.

But the biggest problem is that your charge, he does not comply with the law, and insisting on not returning the money is a crime...

If people agree in advance, there is a need, and it is human nature to regret it afterwards.

Reasonable charging standards, after saying it, it is generally unreasonable...

In many cases, more reasonable things are lacking in virtue in the eyes of the public.

You don't have the ability to take out a loan yourself, and others charge a high fee for your loan, and since you want to borrow money, you can't talk about it.

Hang up the microphone and start the microphone with new netizens.

The question asked is the question of the letter.

This netizen was taken to the mountain by others to run points, which was forced, and he was cut off from the outside world on the mountain and locked up for three days and three nights.

Regarding his inquiry, Li Chen also told the truth.

Three points of doubt:

First, whether the netizen who is the party knows what Shangjia is doing and provides evidence that he does not know.

Second, whether the parties have involuntary evidence.

Third, why didn't you call the police immediately after descending the mountain, but called the police after several days.

For Li Chen's question, the male netizen also said his answer, so much so that it looked like an excuse...

He said that he was deceived, why didn't he call the police immediately after going down the mountain, his answer was that someone else called the police and did not accept it, and the person was still missing.

For this statement, Li Chen felt incredible.

Others were deceived and ran away from points, and the police were not accepted, even if the party was not accepted, the party was gone?

Good guy, is this still the Dragon Kingdom?

The person who called the police is gone, and he can still believe this kind of thing if it is in MB.

The next netizen who is even more bizarre, what he did made Li Chen wonder if he had a bad brain.

This netizen is a talent, and he committed the same crime again while on bail.

was released on bail pending trial because he was suspected of taking a help letter, and this guy couldn't help but give his bank card to the upline to run points, and when he talked about it, he said that he didn't understand the law.

The reason for asking...

He wanted to ask if he could reduce his punishment by making meritorious service.

He wants to report the player who ran the score with him.

It has to be said that the idea is good, but it is difficult to implement.

If you want to make meritorious service, you must assist law enforcement to catch his upline, which is called a co-defendant.

If you report someone else for running a score, they have nothing to do with your case, and it won't work at all.

The actual owners of the bank cards are not like their upline, they are the lowest layer and the best people to catch.

Real-name system, unless you go abroad...

At ten o'clock in the evening, a large number of runners came to ask questions, which made Li Chen a little speechless.

What are you doing, I'm not interested in running scores, I've been arrested and given sentencing recommendations, what else are you asking?

Under normal circumstances, the trial court will follow the sentencing recommendation of the District Attorney's Office, especially after pleading guilty.

There are only two situations that are inconsistent with the District Attorney's Office's sentencing recommendation:

First, the sentence is too severe:

In the course of the trial, the trial court found that the sentencing recommendation of the district prosecutor's office was too heavy, and the trial court will punish appropriately and choose a similar time for punishment.

Second, the sentence is too light:

During the trial of the case, the adjudicator felt that the crime of the person involved in the case was serious, and the sentencing recommendation given by the procurator was too light and should be punished heavily.

Whether it's heavy or light, he will have a line, that is, the prosecutor can accept it, otherwise they will protest...

Broadcast at the speed of light, Li Chen felt his head buzzing.

The most important thing is that his system is desperately reminding him that this situation is not a crime of aiding and abetting...

The Criminal Law has clear provisions on the constitutive elements of the crime of aiding and abetting.

The person is aware of his own behavior, he knows what he is doing, and what his upline is doing.

It can be learned from the mouths of these netizens that they were all deceived...

Since he was deceived and there is evidence to prove that he did not know, even if it causes serious consequences, it should not be regarded as a crime or crime.

But the problem is, they have already pleaded guilty and accepted punishment...

If you tell someone that you are not guilty, but you can sign a plea with the law enforcement unit, it means that you know and admit your crime.

In this case, except for the mage who can argue with the district prosecutor's office to defend his innocence, the lawyer will appear on the stage, and people can knock out all the defense opinions with a single sentence.

The defendant has pleaded guilty and accepted punishment...

He has promised his crimes, and you still defend yourself with a hammer?

So the right way to deal with it:

If you think you are innocent, then do not sign a plea notice, so that the lawyer can have room to play.

Isn't it just an admission to the crime of admitting oneself when you are worried that you will be sentenced to a real sentence, on the other hand?

You really haven't done it, and you're still afraid of real punishment?

If you should toss, you have to toss, and don't be afraid of actual punishment and be forced to admit your crimes.

Is it really good to be given a suspended sentence?

In a way, it's more comfortable than actual punishment, and that's when you're guilty.

You are not guilty, you were deceived, and you were sentenced to a suspended sentence and left a case record, which directly affected three generations of immediate family members, aren't you aggrieved?

After taking a bath, Li Chen lay on the bed and fell into deep thought.

For the first time, he had a question mark about the way the live webcast was drained.

Whether online law popularization can attract traffic, whether people will come to their own law firms to establish a client relationship, and whether their client needs meet their own standards.

At the moment, there are no tangible benefits to this kind of livestreaming.

There are tens of thousands of people in each live broadcast, of which 80% of netizens just come to watch and listen to stories, and 18% of them are asking.

Is he guilty or not, and can the punishment be mitigated?

There are very few people who really need it.

Just ask, which client would say his real needs in front of tens of thousands of people?

"We have to find a different way to drain the traffic."

After thinking about it for a long time, Li Chen also made up his mind.

How to show your professionalism and make others trust you to build a trust is a problem that needs to be solved.

Popularization of law is popularization of law, which should be pure and cannot carry other ideas.

Online microphone connection, for the problems raised by netizens can not be accurately solved, it is likely to have a negative impact...

When people ask you questions, the core answer you give me is to find a criminal lawyer to solve it, so what do you do?

It's a contradiction...

Li Chen shook his head a little helplessly.

The Bar Association has a rule that if he answers questions for free, it is a violation of the rules...

(End of chapter)