This case Li Chen had also swiped on the Internet in the world before he had not traveled before.

It was also a hot case on the Internet, and netizens were also divided into two camps:

The main thing that the driver is guilty of is that the customer asks three times why he didn't follow the navigation, which is the first point.

Second, when the female customer did not respond to her three inquiries, it also increased her fear.

In other words, if the owner of the car can communicate with the other party in time, the girl will not have extreme ideas, let alone make extreme moves.

Netizens who think that the driver is not guilty, they think that everything is the female customer's own thoughts.

The driver is an old driver, people know which road is the closest, can the approaching road be called yaw?

In the final analysis, it is the problem of the female customers themselves.

Later, the judicial officers also believed that the other party was guilty after repeated simulations.

Since customers are in a car with an operational nature, they have to provide certain safety obligations and guarantees.

The driver's matter, to put it bluntly, is a contradiction between two people.

The driver was in a bad mood because of the customer's procrastination, and he didn't care whether the passenger was wearing a seat belt.

You are an operating driver, not a private car, why don't you remind her of the other party's behavior?

The Road Safety Law clearly stipulates that it is also illegal for the co-driver not to wear a seat belt, which does not mean that there is no problem just if the driver wears a seat belt.

The second point is that you are a truck driver, and you belong to the service industry, how can you bring fire to work?

Li Chen hadn't spoken yet, and the live broadcast room exploded:

"Isn't it, this can also be sentenced??"

"One thing to say, I feel that the judgment is right, I am a big man who will quietly open his mobile phone and take a few glances when he encounters someone who does not follow the navigation."

"Analyze the problem rationally, both sides have problems, but I personally think that it cannot be sentenced."

"Isn't that woman thinking too much, and there are fewer similar problems now?"

"Brother, you are really unlucky, as soon as this incident happens, you will say goodbye to the goods pulling industry forever, right?"

There is nothing wrong with this, even if the platform lets him do it, no passenger will dare to take his car...

"There are still a lot of controversial points in your case, if you really can't accept it, you can also file a complaint."

After thinking about it for a while, Li Chen told him his answer, and the male netizen said with some worry when he heard this: "If I protest, will the sentence against me be aggravated?" ”

"Of course not, when you were sentenced in the first instance, the District Prosecutor's Office did not protest the verdict, so at most the original verdict will be upheld in the second instance, unless they can find that you have a new charge in the case."

"I see, thank you, Lawyer Li."

"You're welcome."

Li Chen responded with a smile.

In his world, the death of a customer has been included in the subject of the forensic examination and is considered innocent.

But the law test is the law test, and he and reality are two different things.

If everyone could act according to the law, there wouldn't be so many outrageous things and verdicts.

"Let's analyze this real-life case."

Li Chen began to analyze the case to control the rhythm of the live broadcast room:

"I read everyone's comments, there are a lot of different opinions, let's analyze this case from the perspective of the driver.

From the driver's point of view, the problem with the female customer is overtime.

You asked me to come over to pull the goods, but the things were not ready, and I waited for more than 30 minutes in vain.

Time is money, you can't make much money on this order, in order to save time, I propose that you spend more money, and I will move with you, so that it can be faster.

And you think that if I come to pull the goods, I should tie you up and move it, which does not meet the rules of the platform, and I have no obligation.

The next thing is to wait for the timeout.

The platform has a time limit, and if the waiting time is too long, it is a timeout, and you have to pay a fee.

The forty-minute waiting period, the customer only took more than 30 minutes to get it, that is, the previous 30 minutes were in vain, so what about unloading?

And on the way, the driver wants to save time and is ready to take a shortcut.

At this time, the female customer asked again, why don't you follow the navigation?

The driver who thought of being prostituted for nothing was very angry and didn't pay attention to the other party.

The female customer was also afraid of his actions and wanted to jump out of the car.

From our normal point of view, does the truck driver know that she is going to jump out of the car?

He must not know, right, if he knew, he would not have taken this order.

Since the customer's car jump incident is a short-term and sudden event, it is difficult for the driver to make the right choice.

I read that someone in the comment section said brakes.

Can a medium-speed car with cargo in the back brake suddenly?

Once the brakes are slammed, the female customer will definitely be thrown out at the first time, this is inertia, you must know that half of her body has leaned out of the window.

So I suggest that those tourists who say brakes should get a driver's license first. ”

"From the driver's point of view, he also took a series of measures after the incident, so he should not be investigated for criminal responsibility according to the crime."

Hearing Li Chen's results, netizens also talked about their opinions:

"I'll just say that the driver should be innocent, you still don't believe it."

"It's really funny, a group of people are still pointing at the driver from the customer's point of view!"

"Is the brother who asked the question still there?"

"What are you anxious about, Lawyer Li hasn't finished talking yet, has he?"

"Let's think about this from the perspective of a female customer."

Li Chen continued to analyze the case: "As a user who needs to move, maybe for some reason, she lives very frugally and is unwilling to spend more money to let people move with her.

The quarrel is because the two sides have different philosophies.

One thinks that if you come to move for me, you have the obligation to help me move things, and the other party thinks that there are platform rules, and if you can, you won't do it.

This is the first factor, and we will talk about the second one, which is also the main factor in the occurrence of the case.

On the way to move, the platform has planned the route of travel, this division does not have a prescribed route to drive, the first time, the female customer just asked with doubts, asking the driver not to follow the navigation?

This is also the common psychology of most people, over-trust in navigation.

We came to a strange environment, what else can we rely on without navigation?

Here, I would also like to remind you that the cars that pull goods are different from private cars, they are fixed prices.

A route, within five kilometers, is more than 30 yuan, whether to take a shortcut or how to go, the decision is up to the driver himself.

The first time the female passenger asked did not reach the corresponding answer, she asked the second time, and even the third time, but the other party did not answer her.

If we assume that we are a girl, will we be afraid when we encounter a situation? ”

(End of chapter)