"Are you questioning the presiding judge?"

Li Chen's successive questioning made the presiding judge of the trial a little annoyed.

In such a case, the main reason why he chose to go to the defendant's family before trial was that this was a hot topic of public opinion, and it was not easy to make a normal judgment.

According to the previous plot, such a thing is not complicated:

The victim reported that although it was a few days apart, it did not mean that she had not been raped.

The defendant confessed his actions in the voice recorder.

Normal logic:

If the victim was really willing, how could she change her story and claim that she had been raped?

And the behavior of the woman's parents is actually not very difficult to understand.

The two were introduced on a blind date, and the emotional foundation is not very stable.

The female victim hesitated for a few days, just considering that this was her fiancé, whether to tell her mother about it.

Her parents, after learning about it, chose to find the defendant with a voice recorder and ask him whether he had raped their daughter.

Most importantly, the man admitted his actions.

Rape!

If you really haven't done it, how can you admit it??

The defendant is not a child and does not have a complete logic of thinking.

He personally feels that the reason why the other party can generously admit it is because he feels that the other party is his girlfriend and is engaged, so there should be no problem.

To put it bluntly, this is the evil result of a lack of legal awareness!

Just like those netizens on the Internet who don't know the truth, they are also misled by the public opinion of the defendant's family, and only see the shameless side of the woman.

After the case was reported by the media, the essence of the matter changed, and the original rape case became justified extortion.

No one thinks from the woman's point of view.

How can it be reported for rape after being engaged?

It is also a funny word that some people say to ask Mr. to die.

Is it to ask my husband to die? Are you sure it wasn't him who wanted to die?

It is precisely because of public opinion that the presiding judge made it difficult.

It is precisely because of some scruples that I will do something that feels abnormal.

The source of the scruples is that the evidence of the accusation is not clear enough.

He wants to be a win-win situation and give both parties a satisfactory result.

If the trial is not open, no one else can see it, and this matter will naturally be trivialized.

He believes that with the passage of time, those netizens will soon forget about this seemingly absurd rape case...

I thought that the other party's family would agree to my request and ask the woman to get a letter of understanding...

But he never expected that the other party not only did not take the understanding, but also asked him to conduct an online trial.

Is this case a case that can be tried online?

He didn't expect that the opposing party's lawyer would be so tough, interrupting the prosecutor's complaint in the trial court, and questioning himself...

"There are a lot of things that people don't understand about the current trial.

As the defendant's defense lawyer, and the defense of innocence, since I found that there was an unfair situation against my client during the trial, then I should raise it in court. ”

Hearing the other party's inquiry, Li Chen also replied without showing weakness.

The prosecutor only looked at the case, and his position was not understandable.

But you, as a judge, should be neutral until the case is formally tried.

You are the lever of the scales, how can there be a reason to tilt from the beginning?

Assuming that the prosecution's prosecution has sufficient evidence, Daniel Zhang himself raped his wife, and I can understand that you can do this.

But what is the evidence now?

A voice recorder?

Oh......

And the video of the girl being brought into the marriage room half-pushed and half-pushed?

Li Chen suddenly remembered that among the evidence of rape by Daniel Zhang accused by the other party, there was also a surveillance video from the corridor outside the marriage room.

But the video was not enough to prove that Daniel Zhang raped the other party, so it was automatically filtered out by Li Chen.

In his defense opinion, it is also mentioned at this time:

The comparison of the woman's situation before and after the incident is based on the video in the elevator.

The woman was intimate with Daniel Zhang before she was "raped", and there was no abnormality after being "raped", which completely did not meet the definition of rape.

Can half-pushing be defined as rape?

Li Chen thinks no.

Rape is defined as a case against a woman's will.

First of all, the word violation, which cannot be understood, is to be clearly stated.

One clearly expresses unwillingness and the other party forcibly engages in sex in defiance of reciprocity, which can be called rape.

You didn't give a clear signal, and the man thought you were going to flirt...

"On the issue of procedure, the presiding judge does not see any problems."

The presiding judge of the trial also began to reply to Li Chen's questions:

"The first point you mentioned is that the presiding judge has just given a clear answer to the question of applying for the recusal of the presiding judge.

The second point is that this case was raised by the woman, and the presiding judge also conducted a closed trial in order to protect the woman's personal privacy, which is also for your own good. ”

After Li Chen heard this, he couldn't help but twitch the corners of his mouth slightly...

Good for us?

Boy.

So according to you, we have to thank you?

"Presiding Judge, I'm interrupting."

After he finished the second point, Li Chen raised his hand again: "What you said is good for us, I really can't understand this sentence."

Before the case went to trial, I think my client had given a clear answer.

They want to hear this case openly online, and there are three points.

First, they didn't believe that their sons had raped each other.

Second, they made a lot of unfavorable remarks on the Internet in the early stage, and only by conducting a public trial can everyone see right and wrong clearly, can they correctly guide those netizens.

I think my client has also made it clear that he is willing to bear the charge of the rapist's family.

The third point is also to take into account the pressure on the trial court to hear the case fairly.

They do not understand the law, and they make remarks favorable to themselves on the Internet before the trial, which brings huge public opinion pressure to the court and other law enforcement units, and they are also very guilty.

With this mentality, they applied for a public online trial of this case, just to repay themselves or the other party's innocence.

Personally, I believe that an open online trial is beneficial to the court, the respected presiding judge, the public prosecutor of the public prosecution and the local prosecutor's office, or the personnel of the armed forces association of the reporting organ.

The prosecutor accused Daniel Zhang of rape and opened an online trial for netizens to see the fact of Daniel Zhang's rape.

Only when they see it, they will not think crankily, and public opinion will naturally be self-defeating.

On the contrary, the non-public trial will only make netizens more suspicious of the authenticity of the case, which is also detrimental to the normal order of society. ”

The presiding judge of the trial couldn't help but twitch the corners of his mouth when he heard this.

Boy!

Do we have to thank you for that, then?

He really wanted Li Chen to sit in his place and let him knock on this hammer.

This is really out of place, I don't know how difficult it is for me...

I'm damn it, I'm almost lazy again

(End of chapter)