"I really can't figure out why I had this happening, I just wanted to get some money to save my father's life, why was it so difficult!"

Huang Dafa, who collapsed, knelt on the ground, and began to blame himself frantically in his heart.

Because judging from the current situation, he feels that he can't save his father.

The whole hall was quiet, and Huang Dafa's abnormality quickly attracted the attention of the robbers.

The robbers at the beginning were disdainful.

They just came to rob, and they didn't kill the hostages, and there was no bloody scene.

As for it??

You, a man in his thirties, fell to his knees and cried bitterly?

And Huang Dafa also made up his mind.

The money that I managed to withdraw with great difficulty would never be snatched away by these damn robbers.

Huang Dafa held tens of thousands of yuan in his arms and vowed to live and die with this money.

The robbers didn't know about him at first, and at first tried to rob him of his money.

After several threats, I also knew the reason for him.

They didn't embarrass Huang Dafa, but chose to let him go, after all, saving people is important.

After hearing this, Huang Dafa stood up, turned around and ran out.

"You're saying that the robbers didn't give you the money, and that you took the money out of the bank yourself??"

Huang Dafa nodded when he heard this: "Yes..."

Li Chen fell silent after hearing this.

At the beginning, he thought that the other party had taken the robber's money...

According to his original train of thought.

Huang Dafa accepted the robbers' accounts, so he was arrested by the Armed Forces Association, mistook him for an accomplice of the robbers, and convicted him of robbery.

In this version, Wong Tai Fat is most likely guilty of covering up and concealing the proceeds of crime.

This is also the main reason why Li Chen asked Huang Dafa's parents if the bank asked them for money.

This is because, from a statutory point of view, the main factor that constitutes a cover-up is the offence that is constituted after the bank has contacted the customer in an attempt to recover it.

Of course...

It can also be constituted if the bank does not contact, because Huang Dafa's money is "dirty money"...

But now?

The robbers robbed the bank, and Huang Dafa took the money he took out from the bank, which was not a gift from the robbers...

Can this constitute a crime?

What crime is this?

"I want you to tell me the truth."

Li Chen looked at Huang Dafa with a serious face and said, "After all, you can't hide these things, and it doesn't make much sense to hide them from me." ”

"I'm telling the truth."

Huang Dafa's expression was serious after hearing this, and he did not escape Li Chen's scrutinizing gaze.

"It's visitation time."

At that moment, the male guard pushed open the door of the interview room and interrupted the conversation between the two.

When the two of them heard this, they stood up.

"If it's as you say, then you're innocent."

Li Chen has thoroughly understood the ins and outs of the whole matter, and the next thing is to check the file to see the "criminal evidence" of the law enforcement agencies.

How did Huang Dafa "degenerate" into a robber, and what is their basis?

When the time came to the afternoon, Li Chen set off to the trial court to apply for the case file.

In the reading room, Li Chen read everyone's confession transcripts very carefully.

After reading other people's records, Li Chen understood why Huang Dafa became an accomplice of the "robber".

In the confession of the bank staff, Huang Dafa's abnormal behavior of going to the bank several times a day to "withdraw money" is abnormal in their eyes.

And more importantly, the silver robbery not only did not rob him of his money, but let him go.

Huang Dafa is very smart, and in this way he excludes his "criminal suspicion"...

Looking at Huang Dafa's confession of guilt and punishment, Li Chen thought of a lot of bad phenomena.

As the "first" suspect involved in the case, his treatment can also be imagined...

After leaving the court, Li Chen returned to the hotel and wrote an application for the second instance on the same day.

Huang Dafa's case cannot be dragged on.

He was not wrong in this case, and he should not have been imprisoned in this "unwarranted"...

Li Chen's defense is divided into three parts:

The first part is the history of the case.

Huang Dafa left the bank with the deposit he had withdrawn from the bank, and there was not enough evidence to accuse Huang Dafa of being an accomplice to the robbers.

Is the robber an accomplice to the robbers who let go of a man who was in a hurry to get money to save his father?

How absurd is this suspicion??

Could it be that the robbers sympathized with his own plight and let him go??

The second point is the behavior of banks.

In this case, Huang Dafa's abnormal behavior of repeatedly going to the bank to withdraw money was caused by the bank's laziness and irresponsibility.

The various procedures required to withdraw money, why not explain the situation to the other party when the other party takes the passbook for the first time, why do you toss Huang Dafa again and again?

Moreover, the bank has a green channel, the purpose of which is to help those customers who urgently need "life-saving money" to handle their business more conveniently.

Do you doubt the authenticity of Huang Dafa's withdrawal of money to save his father, but it's not simple?

Wouldn't it be clear if you sent two staff members directly to the hospital to take a look??

In the final analysis, it is Huang Dafa's abnormal behavior of withdrawing money caused by the laziness of the bank.

The third part is the question of the relevant departments.

In the case, is the source of Huang Dafa's confession true, and is there any illegal interrogation?

Why did the Armed Forces Association not provide the law enforcement video equipment for his interrogation, did the District Prosecutor's Office inquire about the situation, and where is the video of their interrogation?

Did the trial judge in charge of the case take note of such a problem?

Why would Huang Dafa be sentenced as an accomplice of the robbers when other robbers were caught and said they didn't know Huang Dafa?

Li Chen's application for the second instance was submitted to the first-instance trial court at nine o'clock the next morning, and was submitted to his superior court, the Nanhe Provincial High Trial Court, on the same day (it is really a fictitious place name, please do not think about it and associate it!). ）

Nanhe Provincial High Court Marking Room.

Lawyer Liu Chengyuan, who took on the case, had a grim expression when he read Li Chen's appeal.

Consult the dossier, starting with Huang Dafa's confession and ending with the confessions of the last robbers.

This thing is outrageous.

Several of the main security personnel involved in the case did not match Huang Dafa's confessions at all.

Huang Dafa's confession claimed that he knew the robbers, but the arrested robbers said in their confessions that they didn't know Huang Dafa?

So...

Are they accomplices or not??

The answer is obvious, that is, Huang Dafa's confession and confession are problematic.

Other words...

It cannot be ruled out that some people used special methods to obtain Huang Dafa's confession of pleading guilty and accepting punishment...

This is also completely consistent with the third point of the application...

Then he began to look at the bank employee's descriptions and the evidence of the conviction...

At the end, he also roughly understood the ins and outs of the overall incident.

It's clear ...

Huang Dafa should be innocent!

(End of chapter)