Chapter 130: Speaking Directly, I Suspect You of Perjury!

Knock knock!

On the judgment seat, Wang Jianjun listened to Su Bai's statement.

Look down at the material evidence of the trial.

Immediately afterwards, he looked at the accused seat and spoke:

"Does the respondent's attorney ad litem have anything to say about the questions raised by the litigant....?"

Directly put the pressure on Yan upward.

After Yan Shangshang took a deep breath, he understood that he couldn't continue to talk about this topic or let the other party go deeper.

So just change the topic and drag the topic elsewhere.

"Presiding Judge."

"I don't agree with the litigants....."

"State your point of view."

Wang Jianjun directly asked Yan to make a statement.

After Yan sorted out the information on his side, he immediately spoke:

"According to the statements of the litigants' lawyers."

"The lawyer on the litigant side is completely diverting the focus of Lin Haoxue's sentence."

"First:"

According to the original evidence..... it has been pointed out that all the suspects are on Lin Haoxue.

It was not stated by the prosecution, but because Lin Haoxue found the victim's body, he was accused of being a criminal suspect. ”

"But after a long time of screening and screening many criminal suspects, it was determined that Lin Haoxue was the biggest criminal suspect at that time, thus confirming that he was a criminal suspect."

Yan Shang's explanation of this.

directly denied Su Bai's accusation.

What Su Bai meant was that because Lin Haoxue found the female corpse, the law enforcement side determined that he was a suspect, charged him, and handed him over to the prosecution.

This matter, regardless of whether the situation was like this at the beginning or not.

But this is certainly unadmitted.

Otherwise, it is easy to give the impression of violating the rules and making random accusations.

It will definitely be a more troublesome matter by then.

So it must be refuted.

After explaining this point, Yan Shangxiang answered other targeted questions raised by Su Bai.

Go on:

"In response to the fact that the prosecution party raised that we did not have strong criminal evidence of Lin Haoxue, but handed it over to the prosecution, we also do not agree."

"First:"

"Under the circumstances at that time, all the evidence and suspicions have shown that this crime was committed by Lin Manhao."

"And there is Lin Manhao's confession."

"The facts of Lin Haoxue's crime, this point has been confirmed by our side after repeated investigations and looking for evidence.

It is our responsibility to transfer it to the prosecution.

As for confirming the evidence, then it is the responsibility of the prosecution, and in the case of judgment, it is the responsibility of the court and has nothing to do with us. ”

"The litigant accuses us of negligence, which we believe is unreasonable."

"Moreover, according to the relevant provisions of the law, only after the judgment of the court can it be determined that the facts of the crime exist or do not exist."

"Now the court has not made a judgment, and the litigant said that I am guilty of negligence against Lin Haoxue, is this a direct challenge to the definition of the law?"

"How do you think that Lin Haoxue is no longer a criminal? The court has not yet passed the verdict. ”

"As for the issue that the litigation side said that we did not have strong evidence at the beginning, the presiding judge, we believe that the litigation party completely used one-sided information to induce the direction of the trial."

"What the prosecution said without strong evidence is complete nonsense."

"At that time, it was determined that Lin Manhao committed a crime because the victim's fingernails contained Lin Manhao's DNA."

"Isn't that strong evidence.?!"

In order not to take the blame for his own side, Yan Shangxiang directly threw the problem to other parties.

and also questioned Su Bai two questions.

Su Bai's gaze fell on Yan Shangxiang.

Interesting....

No wonder I can sit across from each other today.... Just by virtue of these few rhetorical questions.

Maybe there will be ordinary lawyers who can't resist it.

If you follow the other person's train of thought.

Truly.

If such a judgment can be made, then the three parties of the public security, procuratorate, and law have certain responsibilities.

After all, all three parties are related.

Of course.

Su Bai didn't know if Yan Shangxiang said this on purpose.

Most likely it should be.... Let him not be questioned about just one side?

See more of the other parties?

Su Bai didn't know if there was any other meaning in his words.

It's just that ..... remark is not very friendly to the members of the collegial panel in the trial seat.

Why do you want to get rid of the responsibility relationship when you plead and plead, why do you want to get rid of the responsibility relationship?

Wang Jianjun: ???

I don't care if it means anything else.

Do you think you can influence my verdict like this?

I will judge according to the facts of the law!

If you lose the plea at trial, is there anything wrong with ruling that you lose?

Otherwise, how could the court let me, the vice president, decide this case?

After Wang Jianjun heard Yan Shangxiang's defense, he felt a little unhappy.

However, this did not affect the subjective judgment of the trial.

In a word, how to judge and how to judge!.

….…

But.... Faced with strict questioning.

Su Bai was silently happy in his heart.

This is the one you picked up on this topic yourself....

I wanted to stay later, but if you say so, then I have to follow your wishes.

Be!

The victim's woman's fingernails did have Lin Manhao's DNA, and if so, it is indeed strong evidence.

But you can charge a person with a crime with a single piece of evidence?!

Why?!

What does the definition of the law say?!

Can DNA verification alone determine a person's crime?

You don't know where this DNA came from?

After the trial progresses to this point, the plea and progress of the parties to the litigation are entirely based on the evidence and whether the evidence complies with the rules of process.

Knock knock!

"Leave the litigant to make a statement."

"Okay presiding judge."

Su Bai spoke: "May I ask the accused party, you said that you visited many people and locked up many suspects, is there any evidence to prove it?" ”

"And. We did not conduct a one-sided trial to induce the trial, and the strong evidence that the accused said was the DNA test report. ”

"In general, the DNA report is really strong evidence."

"But according to the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 50 stipulates the meaning of evidence as well as the types prescribed by law."

It states: "

"The materials that can be used to prove the facts of a case are all evidence, including, physical evidence, documentary evidence, witness testimony, victim statements, confessions and justifications of criminal suspects and defendants, appraisal opinions, records of inquests, inspections, identifications, investigative experiments, as well as audio-visual materials and electronic data."

"DNA testing is evidence, but according to Article 50 of the Criminal Procedure Law, there are clear provisions on the scope of application of evidence."

"Evidence must be verified to be true before it can be used as the basis for a verdict, and the results of the appraisal are not the final conclusion, and it still needs to be reviewed and judged by the relevant departments through the judicial organs in combination with the whole case and other evidence, and only after it is verified to be true can it be used as the basis for a verdict."

"However, in this case, during the review stage, the facts were not directly determined in combination with other evidence, and the factual basis of Lin Haoxue's crime was determined directly through the DNA test report, which is obviously not in line with the legal basis."

"At the same time."

"According to the statement of our client, Lin Haoxue, he had already stated and explained at that time the source of the blood stains on his body."

"The statement of the suspect is a key source of evidence in the evidence."

"When there is a conflict in the evidence, in accordance with the provisions of the law, it should be verified as true, that is, the source of the blood stains on Lin Haoxue's body needs to be verified to determine that the DNA identification report is correct."

"DNA evidence alone does not mean strong evidence."

"Similarly, if only one DNA evidence is taken out and the suspect's statement is not verified, the procedure is violated, so how can the DNA report be determined to be accurate?"

"In other words, we question the legitimacy of the DNA report!"

.

….

Now, it's time to question the authenticity of the evidence

Su Bai made a statement from the types of evidence defined in law to the interpretation and application of the Supreme People's Procuratorate's guidance.

Combined with the case.

The last sentence formed a burst of killing.

Without considering the whole picture of the case, how can a criminal suspect be identified solely on the basis of a DNA report..?

In either case, DNA can only be said to be the main evidence, not the only evidence.

Since the criminal suspect has put forward his own explanation, it is necessary to conduct verification, and only after verification can the next trial and judgment be carried out.

It's okay that the suspect can't come up with other evidence and explanations.

There are explanations and refutations.

Suspects are already questioning the origin of your DNA.

If you still talk about DNA, then I'm going to question the authenticity of your DNA report!

This point, Su Bai originally planned to mention later.

But he didn't expect Yan Shangshang to bring it up directly, so he was not polite, and went straight to this.

As a matter of fact.

From the dossier and the evidence above.

Su Bai has always had doubts about this DNA test.

Your DNA testing has been done, and the facts of Lin Haoxue's crime have been confirmed.

Do you still care about spending a little time to verify the source of the bloodstains that Lin Manhao said?

Definitely not!

To know.

Not verifying the relevant important testimony provided by the criminal suspect is already a major violation in terms of process.

If the lawyer raises it in court, then the court will basically rule that the evidence for the accusation is insufficient, and the prosecution will lose the case.

The main evidence is there.

You're still working so hard that you have to break the verdict.?

Among them, who believes that there is no problem?

It's a three-way mutual supervision!

Such a big process loophole, don't know?

It is impossible not to know ....

It is impossible not to know .... Another question arises.

Tut-tut....

What is this TM not an unjust, false and wrongful case?!

.

….…

After Su Bai questioned, Yan Shang broke out in a cold sweat behind his back.

This question.... A difficult question indeed.

.

….…

Meanwhile.

Outside the court trial, in Luo Daxiang's live broadcast room, many enthusiastic sailors are leaving comments.

"Good guy, I call it good guy, isn't the best thing coming?"

"Hahaha!"

"This question is simply overwhelming, directly questioning the source of evidence, if this is not handled well, I think the career of the accused lawyer will end here."

"Judging from Mr. Su's question, I think there is really a certain problem with this, otherwise, Mr. Su would not have asked it directly."

"However, I think this wave is that the prosecution's lawyer has bypassed himself, and if he doesn't bring up any DNA, Lawyer Su may not question this."

"But if you bring it up now, the other party can't answer well, and it's really the end of the lawyer's career."

"Indeed.... Originally, when I first heard the question raised by the prosecution's lawyer, I was still wondering if Barrister Su had overturned this time, but now it seems that I have shallow knowledge, it turns out that Barrister Su is waiting for this one! ”

"Hahaha!"

"I thought so at first, but after thinking about it, how could Lawyer Su overturn because of this!"

"Lawyer Su:, the lawyer opposite is a big gift!"

"Hahaha......."

"Mr. Luo, what do you think of this trial? Is there something wrong with it? ”

"Yes, yes, Mr. Luo, what do you think?"

“.….…”

Facing the fans' inquiries, Luo Daxiang said with a smile: "At present, this is the side of the lawsuit that has a certain advantage, but the specific needs to be further confirmed through the trial." ”

What Luo Daxiang said was a little vague, but in his heart he had already determined that there was something wrong with this case.

But he's on the air....

The trial has not yet ended, and it certainly cannot be directly said that this case is a wrongful case.

Meanwhile.

Jiangdu, in a small area.

After hearing Su Bai's question, Hu Yulong was stunned twice.

watched the live broadcast of the trial directly.

No.... Is this a poignant question?

How did Yan Shang do it!

The lawsuit is like this!

At first, it was quite good when questioned, but later it was mainly turned back by the other party.

What's going on?

Hu Yulong rubbed his eyebrows irritably, staring closely at the live broadcast of the trial.

There can be no problem in this case!

Otherwise....

Hu Yulong couldn't help but shudder when he thought of the consequences.....

But he can't do anything now, he can only hope for Yan upward.

I hope I can refute it.

Hu Yulong looked nervous and didn't say anything more.

Meantime.

Kong Jiantu, who was in the prosecutor's seat, couldn't help but secretly rejoice in his heart in the face of Su Bai's offensive statement.

It's okay ....

Fortunately, he was not involved in this matter.

Otherwise, after this trial, he will lose his identity as a prosecutor.

Not only do you have to lose it, but it is also very likely to cause other unexpected things....

Hiss....

The top criminal lawyer in China is indeed a cow!

Kong Jiantu meditated in his heart, and also hinted that he must be cautious in his words and deeds in the future.

I can say less, but I can't say it, and I don't say it.

Call......

….…

On the court court.

Yan Shangxiang had already adjusted his emotions and looked up slightly at the trial table.

Li Xuezhen looked at Yan upward excitedly with a small face.

When he noticed that his eyes fell on him, Yan Xiang subconsciously looked at Li Xuezhen.

???

What is this for?

.

….….

Trial table.

In the presiding judge's seat, Wang Jianjun listened to Su Bai's statement.

Frowning slightly, he looked at the other two judges.

Zhou Yun and Zhu Chaoyang nodded slightly, and Wang Jianjun rang the gavel and spoke:

"Now let's summarize the points of contention between the litigant and the accused."

"The prosecution believes that the prosecution's transfer to the prosecution without substantial evidence does not comply with the process, has a certain degree of negligence, and finds that its evidence is somewhat erroneous."

"The key point of the prosecution's belief that there is no mistake is that the DNA test is the main evidence, and the first-instance judgment is flawed through the DNA test."

"Is there anything the prosecution has anything to say?"

Kong Jiantu: It's too late for me to hide, and you say? Don't say.

Kong Jiantu knew in his heart that there was nothing to do with him in this trial.

If you talk too much, he'll have something to do.

So can you shut up or shut up.

"Presiding Judge, we have nothing to say."

Knock knock!

"Hmm!"

On the presiding judge's seat, Wang Jianjun rang the gavel.

"The point of contention between the two parties is whether the DNA test can constitute factual evidence to determine Lin Haoxue's guilt, and do the litigants and the accused have any objections to this?"

Su Bai: "We have no objection. ”

Yan Shang: "We have no objection. ”

"Well, if both sides have no objection to this, then they will make a plea on this point."

"Is there anything the parties have to raise?"

Su Bai spoke: "I would like to question the authenticity of the DNA report submitted by the accused. ”

"We are asking the other party to verify the completeness and accuracy of the DNA identification report to verify that the DNA process is not in violation.... Whether it is perjury! ”

Knock knock!

"Application approved!"

"Now the accused party is asked to provide the accuracy of the real DNA report and the complete process."

"Okay."

Yan nodded upwards and spoke, and then handed the prepared materials to the staff beside him.

After the presiding judge Wang Jianjun read it, he immediately handed it over to Su Bai.

Su Bai just skimmed it roughly, and then asked another question: "I want to ask the defendant's agent, how can you confirm that this DNA report is not forged?" ”

"What do you mean? The authenticity of this DNA report has been verified by the relevant authorities, and there will be no problems, if you think there is any problem, you can re-testify. ”

In the face of strict explanations.

Su Bai's eyes were firmly fixed on Yan Shang's face.

You know how to pretend that you don't understand, right?

Deliberately pretending not to understand, right....

Is this what I'm asking?

What I'm asking is, how do you know if your DNA report is a process forgery!

Illustrate the white point.

Is this DNA report a frame-up? Don't pretend you don't understand!

ps: Ask for a monthly pass~

Thanks for the tip.,I'm sorry.,I was thinking a little more today.,Suddenly something....

(End of chapter)