On the court court.

Wang Lei glanced down at the litigation materials, and then his gaze fell on Su Bai's body.

"Is there anything to be added to the prosecution and the charges....?"

Conclusive.

In addition, the complaint has been filed, and there is nothing else to add.

Li Xiaorong had nothing to continue to state, and shook his head:

"Presiding judge, the prosecution has nothing to add."

Su Bai looked at Wang Lei and smiled: "Presiding judge, we have something to add." ”

"Please add."

Faced with the presiding judge's answer, Su Bai spoke:

"May I ask the defendant Fang Tang, where did he make false accusations against you in the process of accusing you of criminal acts?"

"By false accusation, you mean that there is no chain of evidence. In the case of the loss of physical evidence, is it possible to file a lawsuit for negligence against you? ”

"Ask the defendant to answer my question."

Fang Tang: "Yes, the prosecution filed a criminal lawsuit against me for negligence without a chain of evidence and lost physical evidence, which I think is very unreasonable!" ”

"So where is the basis for what you can state that is unreasonable? Based on the statement just made, it has been clearly stated that the chain of evidence is complete, do you have any objection to this? ”

Fang Tang: "....."

Silence continues.

Seeing this, Su Bai smiled and continued his statement.

"First of all—"

As the most important physical evidence in this case, the murder weapon "wooden stick" used by Xu Feng and others is missing. ”

"According to the prosecution's investigation."

"There are only two people on duty that day, you and Dong Bing."

"You two are guards, and you said you don't know where the evidence is..?"

"The situation at that time was that Xu Feng and others were in a state of detention, according to the condition that they did not hide or obtain physical evidence."

"You said that Xu Feng and others falsely accused you, do you have any evidence?"

"And the most critical point, in Xu Feng's dictation of your behavior, after you threw the wooden stick to Xu Feng and the others, you left the detention scene with Dong Bing, what was your idea at that time?"

"Is it to prove your alibi?"

"Is there a suspicion that subjectively let Xu Feng beat Lin Dong?"

"In the process that happened later, why did you collude with Xu Feng and others and fabricate evidence?"

"Based on your point of view, do you have the subjective will to let Lin Dong "learn a lesson", but you didn't expect him to be killed by Xu Feng and others... Because you are afraid of implicating yourself, you take the initiative to collude? ”

Su Bai used Fang Tang's own point of view, and then refuted the content of Fang Tang's statement.

According to Fang Tang's point of view, it can be regarded as an intentional act.

There is a world of difference between manslaughter and intentional death, one negligence and one intentionality.

And as a relevant caretaker, if Fang Tang is found to be intentional.

Then the result will definitely be a heavy sentence .... There's no escape.

Facing Su Bai's pressing step by step, Fang Tang's face changed slightly: "What I'm talking about is evidence." ”

"There's no evidence that I did those things."

"These rhetorical questions of yours are all based on the fact that I have done these things."

"But now how can you prove that I did these things?"

"Is there a possibility that Xu Feng and they framed me? If so, it proves that I am right! ”

"What the judiciary does is a presumption of innocence, not a presumption of guilt, you can't open your mouth and say that I did it on purpose, I did it on purpose."

"We need to come up with practical evidence.... Otherwise I would have refused to confess my guilt all the time. ”

It's obvious.

Fang Tang knew that there was a huge difference between negligence and intentionality, especially when it came to his identity.

Deliberately.... This must be set aside.

And Wang Lei on the trial table nodded slightly when facing the plea between Su Bai and Fang Tang.

So far....

There was basically no problem in convicting Fang Tang in this trial.

It's just that Fang Tang has been talking about him all the time.

If you don't admit it, you don't admit it, but now the direct evidence has pointed out Fang Tang.

It's not that he doesn't admit it, and if I'm guilty, it means that I'm not guilty.

Moreover, according to the current trial situation, what Fang Tang stated does not occupy the legal principle at all.

It's just that....

There is a crucial point in the above plea.

For the deliberateness of Su Bai's proposal.

Looking at Su Bai's statement tone, it didn't seem to be a joke.

The gavel sounded.

Wang Lei looked at Su Bai: "Is there any substantive evidence and legal basis for the prosecution's statement about intentionality?" ”

Facing Wang Lei's inquiry, Su Bai took a deep breath:

"We believe that according to Xu Feng's statement, as well as the situation at the time and the later scenes, Fang Tang's subjectivity needs to be discussed."

"Presiding Judge, I would like to ask the defense a question."

"The application is approved, you can ask questions."

"Okay."

Su Bai nodded and glanced at the litigation materials.

Here comes the most critical issue of this case!

Can you judge the subjectivity of Tang and Dong Bing.

It depends on this question, how Fang Tang and Dong Bing answered and how to deal with it.

Thinking of this, Su Bai slowly spoke:

"I can't understand..."

"Why did the real cause of Lin Dong's death not be announced at the first time of Lin Dong's death, but attributed the cause of Lin Dong's death to a heart attack?"

"Do you think that Lin Dong's parents are not able to apply for the ability of a forensic doctor to conduct an evaluation?"

"According to legal procedures, Lin Dong's parents have the right to have a forensic doctor conduct an autopsy, but why did they have to do everything they could to obstruct it at the beginning?"

"If there is no intervention from the judicial department, then Lin Dong has never been able to do the relevant judicial death identification?"

"Or is it to cover up their own responsibility, and even want to let Xu Feng and the other three deliberately cause death?"

"I just want to ask the defendant Fang Tang and Dong Bing this question!"

"Why did you refuse to conduct an autopsy at the beginning, did you want to cover up your own responsibility, or did you want to help Xu Feng and the other three escape legal responsibility?"

"Ask the defendant to answer!"

Lin Dong died, and no announcement was made at the first time, and the relatives of the parties were also prevented from conducting forensic evaluations.

Obviously there is a huge problem.

What is the problem?

A lot of people are curious and want to know the answer to this question too!

Su Bai asked this question, which was the most critical in the court trial, and it was also a condition for judging intentionality.

The judgment of negligence causing death is definitely a judgment.

But the question that Su Bai asked just now must be clarified.

Why?

Because it involves intentionality.

Since it was not intentional, then according to the measures taken, why did not notify the real cause of death in the first place, but covered it up with a heart attack?

In accordance with laws and regulations.

The relevant departments shall not be liable for the suspected death of their own diseases.

But!

Obviously, it was not a death due to a heart attack, but a death caused by a serious injury caused by an external force.

Why is there a notice that it is the result of death due to a heart attack?

Covering up responsibility or covering up crime?

Or is it a cover-up of a crime in order to cover up responsibility?

After Su Bai threw these questions to Fang Tang and Dong Bing.

Fang Tang's face changed slightly, and Dong Bing's face suddenly became extremely ugly.

I didn't know how to answer for a moment.....

….

Outside the courtroom, facing Su Bai's question, everyone was brought back to the center of the discussion.

Because this topic is very discussable!

Why?

Because it's about everyone's equal benefit from the law.

The barrage of live broadcasts of the trial was as high as thousands per minute.

"yes,! That's a good question! Suddenly recalled, at the beginning of this lawsuit, it was lawyer Su who published his analysis of the case and asked the relevant departments to intervene in the autopsy. ”

"If it weren't for Lawyer Su posting a short video. Lin Dong's family may not be able to do an autopsy! So at that point, the matter will be over? ”

"Co-authoring Lin Dong's case has become a wrong case? caused Xu Feng and other three murderers to get away with it? ”

"How many years do you want Xu Feng and a few other murderers to get away with it?!"

"! If you follow this statement, what Lawyer Su said is really right! At that time, there was no media intervention, and it was really possible that this would have happened! ”

"You know, it was due to the pressure of public opinion that there were follow-up things happening, if this case is changed by another person, maybe the attention is not so big, not so big, is this case over?"

"Ordinary lawyers face this situation, even if they know, they don't have the slightest ability."

“CTM！ I'm not talking about Lawyer Su, I'm just a little emotional, I think what Lawyer Su said is too right, and the question is too critical.

If it wasn't intentional, then why didn't he take the initiative to announce the cause of Lin Dong's death at the beginning, but chose to conceal it.

If you want to conceal it, then is Xu Feng and the other three equivalent to escaping the crime? ”

"In this case, is it equivalent to Fang Tang and Dong Bing being suspected of intentionality, or is there any other situation in the future?"

"That's right! I also understand it this way, and I think this is the outrageous point of this case! ”

.

….

Outside the courtroom, many people felt that this case seemed a bit outrageous, especially after Su Bai's inquiry.

Faced with Su Bai's inquiry, Wang Lei, as the presiding judge, was also slightly stunned and glanced at the litigation materials.

According to Su Bai's point of view.

If there is no willfulness, then there is no need to hide the facts.

This is based on the outcome of the matter to prove the subjectivity.

Fang Tang: You said that you don't have intentional subjectivity, then, in terms of the outcome of the matter, why didn't you make the matter public as soon as possible?

even used perjury to help Xu Feng and others escape the charge in order to cover up their own negligence and subjective intention.

And most importantly, the last and most crucial point!

In the criminal proceedings, the actions of Fang Tang and others involved criminal causality, and they could be regarded as the principal offenders!

After Su Bai stated this, it was no longer the negligent crime of Fang Tang and Dong Bing.

It's a deliberate crime achieved by the deliberate concealment of two people!

Knock knock!

Wang Lei looked at Fang Tang and Dong Bing: "Does the defendant have anything to state?" ”

Statement?

Fang Tang's mind was now a mess, and the questions Su Bai asked were too sharp.

Can't answer at all.

To admit it is to show that you have a subjective will, but not to admit it?

Where can you shirk if you don't admit it?

I can't shirk it at all!

Simply, he remained silent and did not continue to speak.

Dong Bing's brows furrowed terribly, and he didn't know how to answer, so he panicked, so he simply learned from Fang Tang to keep silent....

Seeing this, Su Bai smiled.

To remain silent is to say that you don't say the wrong thing.

Do you really think that you can stay silent and not be judged?

It can only be said that if you remain silent in the trial, the presiding judge will have a worse impression and be more inclined to be guilty.

After all.... According to common sense, who wouldn't open their mouths to say it?

Generally, what you don't say is unreasonable.

Su Bai raised his head slightly and looked at the presiding judge's seat, waiting for Wang Lei's decision.

PS: The supplement is completed, ask for a monthly pass~

(End of chapter)