For this case.

Su Bai had already estimated the worst plan in his heart.

Even with the worst estimates, it is impossible to convict Xiao Haibo.

Unless the presiding judge makes a hard sentence, it is impossible to lose.

So what if the presiding judge makes a hard sentence?

It's easy!

Turn left and drive in 46 minutes.

Su Bai's gaze stared directly at the prosecutor's seat, colliding with Shi Xiujie's gaze.

Top criminal lawyer in China, undefeated myth....?

The corners of Shi Xiujie's mouth were slightly raised, and he was originally a fat square face, which looked a little unrighteous, and this smile brought out a little bit of a villain's sense of pride.

Su Bai smiled, the villain has a will? This trial will blow your head up!

.

….

Meanwhile.

In the presiding judge's seat, in the face of Su Bai's direct stubbornness, Ma Qiao looked down at the litigation materials expressionlessly.

"The prosecution doesn't have any questions to ask any further?"

"Some presiding judges."

Hearing the presiding judge's question, Shi Xiujie immediately blurted out.

Immediately after sorting out the litigation materials, he was about to continue speaking, but was interrupted by Su Bai:

"I would like to ask the prosecutor to think clearly before making inquiries, and I recommend that the prosecutor state and determine the specific matters of our client's criminal verdict.

If it is any other question, we have the right not to answer it, and in this way, it is a complete waste of time for both of us. ”

"We suggest that the prosecutor determine the questions to ask before proceeding."

Knock knock!

Ma Qiao rang the gavel: "The lawyer entrusted by the defense shall not interrupt the order of the trial, and will be warned once." ”

"The prosecutor continues to make a statement, but to make the main points clear."

Faced with the presiding judge's reminder, Su Bai didn't have the slightest surprise, just....

The presiding judge even reminded the prosecutor?

Gee....

Generally speaking, shouldn't the court side be biased in favor of the prosecution?

This is especially the case of this kind of territorial protection.

Ma Qiao's reminder to the prosecutor made Su Bai feel a little surprised.

Shi Xiujie also muttered in his heart, but it didn't make too much noise, as for the specific judgment, it must come to this point in the end, and the presiding judge reminded him that it was also to speed up the progress of the trial.

"Okay presiding judge."

Shi Xiujie nodded and continued to speak:

The determination of Xiao Haibo's perjury is as follows: "

"On the basis of relevant evidence and statements provided by the parties."

"First: In the case of Xiao Haibo's representation of Xia Guangming, Xia Guangming was reminded and explicitly told to remain silent as much as possible during the trial.

And more importantly... reminded Xia Guangming, no matter what Xiao Haibo said in the trial, he privately waited until the court or others asked him, and instructed Xia Guangming to show that Xia Guangming was willing to do so. ”

"Second: Regarding the relationship between Xia Guangming and the manager of Wanli Co., Ltd., in Xia Guangming's statement, he and the manager of Wanli Co., Ltd. are friends, and in the initial inquiry, Xia Guangming stated that he and the manager of Wanli Co., Ltd. are friends, but they were corrected by Xiao Haibo, and the relationship between the two is in business dealings."

"In this process, there is a suspicion of deliberate guidance and inducement."

"Third: During the whole process of entrusting Xia Guangming's case, Xiao Haibo repeatedly influenced Xia Guangming's subjective intentions, and participated in guiding and seducing situations."

"Specifically, we will guide Xia Guangming to judge the relationship between the manager of Wanli Co., Ltd., guide Xia Guangming to identify the entire case and teach Xia Guangming how to express it."

"Presiding Judge, the above is our statement and determination."

After Shi Xiujie finished speaking, he glanced at the defendant's seat, and smiled at the corner of his mouth.

Su Bai noticed, but didn't care, and looked up at the presiding judge slightly.

In the presiding judge's seat, Ma Qiao looked at the defendant's seat after listening to the prosecutor's statement.

"Is there anything else that the defendant or the agent ad litem needs to state?"

Do you have?

Definitely!

Regarding the first and second, Xiao Haibo has just made a complete statement.

Is it time for the other party not to hear?

Of course, the prosecutor raised the previous question, and the relevant additions.

But this supplement is in a practical sense and does not do anything.

It is equivalent to the first point of view, which is that there is an inducing behavior.

added, let Xia Guangming say that when he was questioned by others in private, he said that he was his main administrator.

This is certainly subject to scrutiny in criminal proceedings.

However, in civil litigation, it represents carte bracket agency, and Xiao Haibo has fully explained it just now.

There's no need to go on with that, is there?

The same is true for the remaining second and third points.

This is also the reason why Su Bai asked the prosecutor to determine the conditions.

Because the other party is too capable of!

gave him the feeling that all kinds of crimes must be deducted from Xiao Haibo, and if he can't be deducted, he will start to deduct them from the side.

Hiss....

Su Bai exhaled and continued to speak:

"Presiding Judge, I ask the witnesses to appear in court to make statements."

In the face of the current trial environment, Su Bai didn't talk about anything else, because it was not necessary.

Now, even if you talk about the plea, it doesn't help.

It's better to... Directly invite witnesses to come out, and determine whether there is false testimony based on the witnesses' statements in person.

After all, the prosecutor is not a party, and he may have subjective thoughts about certain things.

Moreover, witnesses are still required to appear in court when testifying later.

After Su Bai applied for a witness to appear in court, he immediately obtained Ma Qiao's consent.

Witnesses appear in court.

In the presiding judge's seat, Ma Qiao opened his mouth to question the witness Xia Guangming:

"Witness Xia Guangming, did you hear what the prosecutor said just now?"

"I hear you."

Xia Guangming sat in the witness seat just now, and he heard this trial very clearly.

"Did the prosecutor just say what you were going through?"

"Yes."

"The prosecutor just described the situation I experienced, and originally I was thinking about this lawsuit at the beginning, so I took a civil lawsuit according to the loan lawsuit."

"Lawyer Xiao, who is now the defendant, told me that it would be easier to sue Wanli Co., Ltd. for illegal fundraising, and then told me a lot of other things and explained various precautions to me."

"So did he induce and coax you in the process?"

"Some presiding judges."

"Please give us specific examples."

"Specific examples. The prosecutor has just stated very clearly, and I can't think of any more specific cases for the time being...."

"Okay."

After questioning the witness Xia Guangming about some relevant matters, the presiding judge Ma Qiao turned his attention to the defense again.

"Excuse me about the defendant party.... Do you have any objections to the accusations of the witness Xia Guangming? ”

"Yes!"

"I don't obey the charges against me!"

Xiao Haibo looked at the presiding judge and spoke.

I thought to myself, this is fucking too dark!

He had already explained and stated it just now, and now the presiding judge asked him to continue to state and explain again?

Does it make sense?

It doesn't make any sense at all!

Is it possible to imagine a statement, state it a thousand times, and then look for loopholes in each part of the statement?

"I have just stated it very clearly, whether it is the first point or the second point, I have analyzed it in great detail."

"First of all!"

"I asked the witnesses to confess whatever I said, and that's really something wrong with my statement."

"Because I am a special agent, I have the corresponding responsibility in civil proceedings."

"The reason I say this is because I am afraid that the witnesses will not be able to understand what I mean at first, and after I have stated it, the witnesses will not be clear when the court and others in turn question the witnesses.

In this way, it is easy to cause a wrong judgment in a civil lawsuit and affect the final judgment.

So I've been emphasizing that the witnesses do what I say, but in the process, I haven't violated any of the relevant procedural laws. ”

"And I have explained the relevant matters and reasons to the party Xia Guangming."

"He showed that he knew, he understood, and that's why I stated it in the first trial."

"Again."

"What I have stated is all based on facts, there is no false content, and there is no perjury, based on the above, I don't know what I have violated the criminal law."

"That's my answer."

In the face of Xiao Haibo's statement, Ma Qiao was expressionless, and before he could speak, Shi Xiujie hurriedly began to ask Xia Guangming.

"Does the witness have anything else to say?"

Xia Guangming shook his head: "I haven't thought of it for the time being, I forgot it." ”

Su Bai: .....

You're all here to play a double reed, right?

Su Bai raised his hand to signal, and after getting Ma Qiao's consent, he opened his mouth to state:

"Presiding judge, I think the general situation of this trial has been decided."

"There is no need to elaborate further."

"Based on the description of our client and the description of the prosecutor, the facts have become clear."

"It probably means that in the accusations of witnesses and the confessions of witnesses, it can be clearly seen that the witness is relying on his own subjectivity to prove that our client has induced him."

"But it's not..."

"In fact, when our party is helping the witness to entrust, the witness does not think about certain aspects or thinks inappropriately."

"For example, it can be clearly seen whether the manager and the witness of Wanli Co., Ltd. know each other and whether it is a relationship between friends."

"The witness believed that the manager of Wanli Limited and he were friends, and that there was a loan relationship between the two people."

"But in fact, our party believes that the other party's illegal fundraising has a basis, and the other party's determination of itself is not a loan, but a purchase."

"There are no IOUs on both sides, but there is evidence of purchase."

"From this it is obvious that the relationship between two people is not a loan relationship."

"This denies the subjective judgment of the witness at that time."

"Is it true that our client's erroneous subjective judgment of relying on evidence to correct the witnesses at that time was inducement and bad guidance?"

"Whether from the perspective of law or subjective cognition, there is evidence to prove that it is a purchase and there is an illegal fund-raising, which is an ironclad fact, not a subjective imaginary loan relationship by witnesses."

"With the testimony of the witnesses, it is a loan to say that it is a loan?"

"If that's the case, what's the evidence?"

"No more evidence, the court can convict us on the spot!"

"If the witness has to exist and say that the relationship between the two people is a loan, then at that time, when our party Xiao Haibo informed Xia Guangming of this and listed the relevant supporting evidence, why didn't Xia Guangming deny and refute it?"

"To ask our client to file a civil lawsuit for Xia Guangming?"

"Based on the above, it can be clearly seen or verified that our party did not have any inducement behavior, but based on the facts, to remind Xia Guangming."

It's just that this kind of reminder was mistaken by Xia Guangming as an inducement, and besides, from another point of view:"

"Perjury affects the correct judgment of the judiciary, but our client helped Xia Guangming to try this case."

"His suggestions and tips to Xia Guangming do not affect the correct judgment of the judiciary, because the case is based on it, and the conclusivity and legitimacy of the evidence can be guaranteed."

"Based on the above examples..."

"We believe that our client should be acquitted in this trial."

Su Bai's statement was very simple.

Plainly.

Roughly speaking, regarding this trial, Xia Guangming is completely nonsense, his accusations are completely based on his own subjective wishes, and Xiao Haibo is based on evidence to correct Xia Guangming's subjectivity.

Based on the facts, can it be called perjury to correct Xia Guangming's concept?

Can this be called inducing to lead to a mistake in a judicial decision?

Definitely not!

If it weren't for the geographical protection, the case would have been withdrawn when the case was being opened for investigation or when the prosecution department was investigating.

If you have to file a case, then ask the law enforcement department to continue to supplement the evidence.

Just relying on Xia Guangming's confession to correct it, isn't this completely nonsense....

And then there .... According to the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Law, illegal evidence must be excluded in accordance with the law.

The prosecution has completely failed to fulfill its responsibilities in this regard.

I still insist on filing a public prosecution....

You okay?

If you insist on filing a public prosecution, will the court still give a hard verdict?

The statements were so clear, Su Bai didn't believe that the court would give a hard verdict.

Su Bai looked up at the presiding judge's seat slightly, waiting for Ma Qiao to make the relevant judgment.

PS: I ask readers to vote for some monthly passes~

(End of chapter)