Chapter 359 No Evidence? Apply directly for a verdict!

In Wan Xiangdong's statement, what is required is direct evidence.

According to his meaning, that is.

If Huang Xuemei does not give the specific details of this case.

Then the case cannot prove that Huang Xuemei is a criminal.

But in fact, the prosecutor used side evidence.

That is, the source and destination of the chemical drugs, as well as various facts, to accuse them.

Su Bai raised his hand to signal that he wanted to supplement his accusation, after obtaining the consent of the presiding judge.

Su Bai looked at the defendant's attorney's seat and the defendant's client.

"According to the statement of the lawyer entrusted by the defense, the confessions of Huang Xuemei and Zhu Yun's roommates in this case cannot be used as a condition for determining intentional subjectivity."

"The highly toxic chemicals that Huang Xuemei stole from the laboratory cannot be used as the main evidence for the accusation."

"Then in this whole act, I would like to ask the defendant Huang Xuemei."

"Why are you stealing chemical drugs from the lab?"

Huang Xuemei was silent for a few seconds, her eyes were calm, and she didn't have the slightest panic.

"I was stealing the chemical drugs in the lab because I wanted to do experiments."

"Experiments? What experiments to do? Is there a finished product that you can show? ”

"No, I accidentally lost the chemicals on the way to campus after taking them out of the lab."

"I don't know how I can't find it."

Regarding Huang Xuemei's answer, Su Bai continued to speak: "I lost it in your statement. ”

"But the surveillance on campus showed that you put chemicals into your backpack, and through monitoring and time calculation, you brought the chemicals directly into the dormitory."

"And.... In Zhu Yun's cup and toiletries, the composition of the corresponding chemical was detected. ”

"How do you explain that?"

Faced with Su Bai's question, Huang Xuemei shook her head:

"I don't know, I don't know what's going on, but the first time I got back to my dorm room, I saw that the chemicals in my bag were missing."

"To be honest, it is true that all the suspicions for poisoning are on me, but I didn't do it."

"I can't explain that."

"Do you not know how to explain it, or is this thing just done by you, and you don't want to admit it?"

Faced with Su Bai's inquiry, Huang Xuemei directly retorted:

"You can't wrong me with this!"

"I didn't want to admit it, I just wanted to say that I didn't do it."

"Besides."

"Is there a coincidence in this? There must have been a coincidence. ”

"Just because I took the chemicals from the lab doesn't mean I'm poisoning them."

"Maybe someone else is jealous of Zhu Yun and puts these things in her cup and toiletries."

"You can't just put this charge on me, can you?"

"If there was evidence, I could have pleaded guilty, but there is no evidence now!"

"What you're saying is speculation, but there's no actual evidence that I poisoned it."

"Although the relationship between me and Zhu Yun is not good, I also admit that I am a little jealous of her."

"But jealousy is jealousy, and I can't poison her for this reason, right?"

"It doesn't make any sense at all...."

"And the above evidence does not prove that I poisoned the person at all."

"Did anyone see me poisoning Zhu Yun's toiletries?"

"Not really!"

"So I think Zhu Yun's entrusted lawyer, the question you asked is not necessary for me."

"I haven't done these things, and I'm not going to admit that I did."

"Presiding judge, I uphold the defendant's legal rights and interests, and ask Zhu Yun's lawyer to stop questioning me."

I have to say that Huang Xuemei's reaction was very fast, and the opposition measures were also very fierce.

Judging from the statement just now, Huang Xuemei's statement has a certain amount of truth.

In criminal law, the prosecution and the prosecutor cannot allow the criminal suspect to prove his innocence.

Huang Xuemei's statement just now is also based on the fact that she cannot prove her innocence to refute it.

To put it bluntly - it still grasps the key point that there is no direct evidence to refute.

It can be said ....

Huang Xuemei's statement can completely defend herself.

Or rather....

Huang Xuemei had already read the relevant provisions of the domestic criminal law before poisoning, and was ready to exonerate herself from the crime of poisoning.

After all....

As a student of Peking Capital University, I am very fast in learning certain legal knowledge.

Although it is said that it is not possible to achieve mastery, it is still possible to understand the interpretation of a certain crime.

In fact.

When Huang Xuemei made the decision to poison at the beginning, she had already prepared a way to deal with it.

Otherwise.... It is also impossible for the prosecution to fail to investigate direct evidence.

Nor is it possible for her to consistently show her innocence during interrogations by law enforcement and prosecutors.

Even if all the suspicions point to her, she also shows that one point is innocence.

Why?

Because she also knows very well in her heart that if she doesn't admit her guilt, there is a possibility of exoneration.

If you plead guilty, it is likely to be a reprieve from death.

After Huang Xuemei finished speaking, she glanced at Su Bai.

The two looked at each other.

Su Bai could see that there was an inexplicable and indescribable psychology in Huang Xuemei's eyes.

It seems that this trial has been determined and she cannot be convicted.

At present, all the clues and evidence point to Huang Xuemei.

But how can it be determined without direct evidence?

The side evidence is that Huang Xuemei stole chemicals from the laboratory and brought them into the dormitory.

The whereabouts of the chemicals are not poisoning by Huang Xuemei.

There are no intuitive objective facts to show this.

So is there any other way?

There are too!

"Presiding judge, I don't agree with Huang Xuemei's application for rejection."

"I did not infringe on the defendant's legal rights, so the rejection of the defendant's application has no factual basis."

On the judgment seat, Sun Zhengping glanced up at Su Bai and then at Huang Xuemei.

In fact.... Sun Zhengping is also very clear in his heart.

Judging from the current defense, it is difficult to accuse Huang Xuemei of a de facto crime through direct evidence.

In particular, the defendant and the lawyer entrusted by the defendant refused to admit guilt.

In addition, direct evidence has been used as a reason for evasion to dismiss the prosecution's accusations.

But....

Huang Xuemei's application for Su Bai not to question her again has no legal basis.

A direct refusal is possible.

The hammer sounded, and Sun Zhengping spoke: "The defendant applies to refuse the statement and questioning of the lawyer entrusted by the prosecution. ”

"The lawyer appointed by the prosecution did not violate the law in any way during the questioning."

"So the defendant's application was denied."

"Is there anything else the prosecution has entrusted a lawyer that wants to make a statement?"

Faced with the presiding judge's question, Su Bai spoke:

"Yes, Presiding Judge."

"I also want to ask the defendant, you don't think you poisoned yourself, but in the face of all the evidence now, it points to you."

"You refuse to confess, do you?"

Regarding the presiding judge's refusal, Huang Xuemei didn't have much experience, and said flatly:

"It's not that I refuse to admit my guilt, it's that I didn't poison Zhu Yun at all."

"Okay."

Su Bai nodded and looked up at the seat on the trial table: "Presiding judge." ”

"According to the current situation of this case, Huang Xuemei refuses to admit that it was Zhu Yun who was injured by poisoning."

"But according to the confession of his roommate, and the evidence that we have now."

"Our analysis of the current situation is as follows:"

"According to the confession of her roommate, Huang Xuemei once said that she wanted to kill Zhu Yun."

"Whether it's a joke or not, but it already shows Huang Xuemei's hostility towards Zhu Yun."

"There's one more thing in this case that the prosecution hasn't stated."

"That is, Huang Xuemei and Zhu Yun submitted their positions to the same company."

"Zhu Yun was admitted, but Huang Xuemei was not, from this point of view."

"Will Huang Xuemei have a deeper grudge against Zhu Yun?"

"Definitely!"

"Because this is a normal person's idea, there will definitely be a certain amount of complaining about a person you hate getting your own position."

"This is normal legal reasoning."

"Another point is that not long after Zhu Yun was admitted, Huang Xuemei went to the laboratory and stole chemical drugs."

"According to Huang Xuemei, she is doing experiments for herself."

"But Huang Xuemei didn't have a specific statement about what experiment to do and how to do it."

"As a member of the laboratory, Huang Xuemei doesn't know how harmful the experiment of highly toxic chemicals is?"

"If you don't pay attention to highly toxic chemicals during experimental operations, they will pose a huge threat to your health."

"As a member of an institution of higher learning and a person in a laboratory, Huang Xuemei should be well aware of this."

"Is it necessary to leave the protection of the laboratory and do experiments?"

"There's no need for that."

"What's more, if you want to conduct an experiment privately, you can apply to the school."

"So from this point of view, the possibility of Huang Xuemei lying is huge."

"Another point is that Huang Xuemei said that she lost the highly toxic chemicals."

"The loss of highly toxic chemicals has a lot of impact, and the school is likely to hold individuals accountable."

"Huang Xuemei first stole the highly toxic chemicals in the laboratory, and then stated that she had lost them..."

"She knows the effects of highly toxic chemicals and the dangers of personal harm, so why didn't she look for them in the first place?"

"Or why don't you report it like a school?"

"Judging from the above, there are various logical problems in Huang Xuemei's statement."

"It cannot be confirmed from legal reasoning or objective facts."

"Nor can it be objectively substantiated."

"Based on the above."

"Whether it is from the objective facts or the subjective legal situation, it can be shown that Huang Xuemei stole the highly toxic chemicals in the laboratory not for experimental purposes."

"It's just an excuse."

"For this point, I apply for a judgment to reject Huang Xuemei's statement."

At the trial, although it was said that Huang Xuemei could not prove that she did not commit a crime.

However, her confession was not necessarily accepted by the court.

According to Huang Xuemei's confession just now, she said that she lost the chemicals she brought out of the laboratory.

Is it logical?

It doesn't follow the logic!

In the proof of this directness that relies on the time from the laboratory to the dormitory and monitoring.

It can be directly determined that the chemicals in Huang Xuemei's bag were not lost, but were taken to the dormitory by Huang Xuemei.

As for Huang Xuemei.... She could still insist that the chemicals were lost.

But she had no proof.

So in the judgment of this point, the presiding judge can completely judge that Huang Xuemei brought chemicals to the dormitory.

Got through this step....

Then the case is a big step forward.

At least further aggravated Huang Xuemei's suspicions.

As for Huang Xuemei, she has been repeating that there is no direct evidence to prove that she was poisoned.

But actually.... She wasn't poisoned, so why did she bring highly toxic chemicals into the dormitory?

Where do highly toxic chemicals go?

Can these Huang Xuemei give a reasonable explanation?

Can't give it!

Why?

Because the person who poisoned Zhu Yun was Huang Xuemei!

The existing chain of side evidence has all pointed to Huang Xuemei!

Escape....?

Almost impossible!

…

PS: Ask for a monthly pass~

Mobile version:

『Click here to report error』『Add to bookmark』