Chapter 363 verdict result, the facts of the crime are clear, and there can be no objection!

After the prosecution has submitted new evidence, the court has notified the parties of the time for the trial to be reopened.

Soon, the trial was held again.

This time, on the trial bench, Sun Zhengping repeatedly confirmed and sorted out new evidence and facts.

New evidence and facts have made it possible to make a preliminary determination.

However, the specific situation still depends on the performance of the parties at the trial.

Other than that....

In this trial, Huang Xuemei refused to admit guilt, which brought huge difficulties to the investigation and judgment of this case.

The case has been decided and will not be decided on the basis of voluntary surrender.

If Huang Xuemei is judged to be poisoned.

Then in this case, the punishment for Huang Xuemei should be very serious.

At this point, Sun Zhengping and the members of the collegial panel had discussed various situations in advance.

…

Meanwhile.

After the trial, people who watched the live broadcast of the trial online were also discussing whether the prosecution would present new evidence this time.

Whether the resubmitted evidence can be used to punish Huang Xuemei.

"I've read the evaluations of a lot of bigwigs in the legal circle, if there is no new evidence for certification this time."

"Then Huang Xuemei is very likely to get away with it!"

"This case is difficult! Could it be that Huang Xuemei's confession was fully demonstrated? ”

"I don't know! This case is indeed full of twists and turns, and now the reopening of the trial can only hope that the prosecution will have direct evidence to prove that Huang Xuemei has committed a crime. ”

"The murderer can't be allowed to escape!"

"Yes, yes, there is absolutely no tolerance for the criminal murderer to escape!"

“.….”

As soon as the trial began, before it officially began, a large number of messages appeared in the comment area.

It can only be said that the attention of this case is very large.

On the court court.

As the presiding judge, Sun Zhengping directly asked the prosecution to start submitting new evidence.

Because in the previous discussion of this case, there was actually a certain certainty.

That is, if you want to convict Huang Xuemei, you must come up with direct evidence to prove it, or it is extremely necessary to prove it.

The hammer sounded, and Sun Zhengping spoke: "This court session will continue to try the case of Huang Xuemei's poisoning." ”

"Now I ask the prosecution to submit a new factual basis."

"Good Presiding Judge,"

Chen Le nodded slightly.

At first, the prosecution did not find favorable evidence because of the tight time and the feeling that the breakthrough point might be on Huang Xuemei.

But now there is evidence.

As the prosecutor and prosecutor of this case, Chen Le has a clearer and clearer verdict on Huang Xuemei's conviction.

Faced with the presiding judge's request to submit new factual evidence, Chen Le spoke:

"Based on the additional evidence provided by the prosecution after the adjournment of the trial."

"Now we have new evidence, which is evidence of residues of chemicals stolen by Huang Xuemei from the laboratory."

"Based on the prosecution's findings."

"After Huang Xuemei stole chemicals from the laboratory, she took them to the dormitory, and after poisoning, Huang Xuemei hid the remaining chemicals in the corner of the campus."

"As for the relevant evidence, we have already submitted it."

“.….”

"It has been confirmed that the chemicals hidden in the corners of the campus by Huang Xuemei are different from the amount of chemicals stolen in the laboratory."

"According to the test, it can be concluded that the amount of chemicals involved in Zhu Yun's poisoning is not much different from the amount of chemicals stolen by Huang Xuemei from the laboratory divided by the amount of chemicals hidden in the corner of the campus."

"There is this evidence to further confirm that the chemicals that Huang Xuemei stole from the laboratory were used to poison Zhu Yun."

"Supplemented by other objective evidence and facts, it is shown that Huang Xuemei poisoned Zhu Yun."

"Based on the above, it can already be determined that Huang Xuemei is a poisoner."

After Chen Le's statement was completed, it could be seen that Wan Xiangdong's expression in the defendant's lawyer's seat had obviously changed.

Bench on the judging table.

Sun Zhengping nodded slightly, and then looked at the defendant's attorney's seat.

"The lawyer entrusted by the defendant, do you have any other thoughts on the new evidence submitted by the prosecution?"

After listening to the prosecution's statement, Wan Xiangdong knew that this piece of evidence had a very adverse impact on Huang Xuemei.

But!

Whether or not to make a decision depends on the defense.

Wan Xiangdong has nothing to say about this trial, he can only follow one article - no direct evidence!

Wan Xiangdong spoke: "Presiding Judge, I have other opinions. ”

"We do not agree with the prosecution's accusation based on this point."

"We still insist on the view that there is no eyewitness and direct evidence to prove that we poisoned, so we do not accept such accusations."

At this time, Chen Le spoke again: "The statement made by the lawyer entrusted by the defendant does not accept this point of view, but it does not come up with realistic circumstances to deny our statement. ”

"I would like to ask the lawyer entrusted by the defendant, what you said does not agree, on what basis do you not agree?"

Wan Xiangdong spoke: "We still maintain a point of view, that is, there is no direct evidence that can prove that Huang Xuemei is the poisoner. ”

"According to the prosecution's statement, what does the fact that Huang Xuemei hid chemicals in a corner of the campus?"

"This fact does not prove anything, but only that Huang Xuemei wants to hide chemicals in the corner of the campus."

"According to this, can Huang Xuemei be accused of poisoning?"

"Not at all!"

"That's why I still maintain an innocent view."

Wan Xiangdong's statement, how to say it, is untenable, completely untenable.

Just now, Wan Xiangdong just stated that Huang Xuemei hid chemicals in the corner of the campus.

However, it is not stated on the basis of objective factual conditions.

What are the actual objective conditions?

In fact, objective conditions refer to previous objective evidence, circumstantial evidence, and witness testimony.

At present, according to the above, the entire criminal process is very clearly displayed.

Why?

The first point is that Huang Xuemei's motive for the crime was that she stole highly toxic chemicals from the laboratory out of jealousy of Zhu Yun.

The second point is whether Huang Xuemei used highly toxic chemicals for poisoning.

The previous criminal process is missing this important link.

There is no evidence to prove that Huang Xuemei used highly toxic chemicals for poisoning.

Therefore, it cannot be found guilty.

But now?

Now that the remaining highly toxic chemicals have been found, Huang Xuemei's poisoning behavior has been proved from the objective main evidence under the rule out of other possibilities.

This important link that was missing before has also been filled in at this time.

From this point of view, the chain of evidence is complete, and as for the lack of direct evidence as stated by Wan Xiangdong, this is completely nonsense.

The chain of evidence is complete, and you still say that there is no direct evidence?

The direct evidence you say is just what you think is the direct evidence.

And not the fact that there is no direct evidence.

Regarding Wan Xiangdong's statement, Su Bai immediately retorted:

"Presiding judge, we do not agree with the statement of the lawyer entrusted by the defense."

"First of all, the lawyer entrusted by the defendant obviously avoided the relevant circumstances in this trial."

"Huang Xuemei hid chemicals on campus, and this incident alone really doesn't prove anything."

"But what about the reality?"

"In fact, the case is not confirmed from a single perspective."

"It's about confirming the whole fact."

"In the last trial, I have stated many times and asked many times why Huang Xuemei stole chemical drugs from the laboratory."

"None of them have been answered."

"At that time, the lawyer entrusted by the defense stated that although Huang Xuemei was hostile to Zhu Yun, there was no actual evidence to prove that Huang Xuemei was poisoned."

"Then let's look at the evidence that has been found."

"Huang Xuemei has obviously used chemical poisons, so where are chemical poisons used?"

"Judging from the physical evidence, it was used on Zhu Yun's body."

"This is objective factual evidence, although the lawyer entrusted by the defense wants to show that Huang Xuemei did not poison."

"But how can the defense refute this objective fact?"

"I would like to ask the lawyer entrusted by the defense, how did you prove Huang Xuemei's innocence?"

"If you want to prove Huang Xuemei's innocence, then you need to explain where the missing dose of the chemical went."

"Now there are objective facts to prove Huang Xuemei's poisoning."

"Can the lawyer, the lawyer entrusted by the defendant or Huang Xuemei herself, prove where the missing chemical agent went?"

"Or is there any proof of it?"

"If there are no facts, how can innocence be confirmed?"

Su Bai's statement is undoubtedly sharp for the defendant.

From the point of view of objective facts, the chain of evidence that now exists is sufficient.

It is completely possible to determine Huang Xuemei's poisoning behavior.

Huang Xuemei said that she did not poison herself, or explained her behavior.

Totally explainable.

But under the existing objective facts, your interpretation must also have objective facts.

Otherwise, your suspicions, your speculations will not be legally valid.

Is it possible that you only want to rely on your confession to overturn the objective facts presented by the prosecution?

It's simply impossible!

Previously, in the absence of objective facts, Huang Xuemei could refute, be silent, guess, or say that there were many possibilities to prevent the court from convicting her.

But now the situation is different.

After the prosecution has the evidence, Huang Xuemei cannot provide the corresponding evidence.

Then the court can judge Huang Xuemei based on the objective evidence submitted by the prosecution.

At this time, even if Huang Xuemei did not admit guilt and accept punishment.

Under the absolute objective facts, the relevant judgment must also be accepted.

Facing Su Bai's inquiry, Wan Xiangdong sat silently on the entrusted seat.

This question was something he hadn't thought of.

From Su Bai's point of view, they really couldn't come up with objective facts to deny their crimes.

But how to say it ....

Wan Xiangdong still chose to insist on using direct evidence to refute it.

"Presiding Judge."

"Although the current evidence can accuse Huang Xuemei of criminal behavior, there is still a certain possibility that it is a coincidence."

"So we still think we need to supplement this evidence."

"According to the available evidence, Huang Xuemei cannot be sentenced."

Possibility....

In previous court trials, Wan Xiangdong repeatedly raised this possibility.

But in fact, there are many places that the defendants Huang Xuemei and Wan Xiangdong can't explain.

For example, if you don't do intentional poisoning, if you don't poison it, why go and steal the drugs from the lab.

Why lie ....

And why hint at roommates ....

And, where do the missing chemicals go.

These are all things that Huang Xuemei and Wan Xiangdong can't explain, and relevant things have been determined through objective facts.

Even if Wan Xiangdong proposed this kind of coincidence, but in the case of various objective factors, this kind of coincidence is almost zero.

The court will not normally accept such a situation when deciding.

There is no doubt that Wan Xiangdong's explanation is very weak.

There is no point in continuing to argue any more.

The evidence is clear, the facts are clear, Su Bai said directly:

"Presiding judge, according to the existing evidence, the chain of evidence of Huang Xuemei's crime is complete."

"We apply to determine whether Huang Xuemei has the fact of poisoning."

Su Bai directly applied for a verdict, and did not continue to give Wan Xiangdong a chance to reply.

Because there is no point in continuing the defense.

The argument is nothing more than that point of view, and this point of view is very clear in the available evidence.

But....

When Su Bai applied for a judgment, Wan Xiangdong frowned slightly, and wanted to raise an objection.

But he was directly refuted by Sun Zhengping, who was on the judgment seat, and struck the magic hammer.

"Now the facts are clear, and the collegial panel has understood the views expressed by the defendant's lawyer."

"Does the defense entrust a lawyer to state that it wants to state that there are no eyewitnesses and Huang Xuemei's plea of guilt and acceptance of punishment, and she cannot be judged?"

Wan Xiangdong nodded: "Yes, Presiding Judge." ”

Sun Zhengping: "Since this is the case, then there is no need to continue to make other statements." ”

"Now it is up to the judgment whether Huang Xuemei was poisoned."

On the bench, Sun Zhengping simply sorted out some materials, and then spoke:

"Judging from circumstantial facts, objective evidence, and physical evidence."

"Huang Xuemei cannot make a strong refutation of the factual evidence presented by the prosecution, or submit relevant factual evidence."

"Regarding Huang Xuemei's poisoning of Zhu Yun, the chain of evidence is complete."

"Now it is determined that Huang Xuemei has been poisoned."

"No objection shall be raised without other objective facts!"

The hammer sounds, and the judgment is over.

The voice fell on the court trial floor, and the factual result of Huang Xuemei's poisoning was directly determined.

At the hearing seat, Huang Tao, as Huang Xuemei's father, felt a sigh in his heart after hearing Huang Xuemei's verdict.

He looked at the seat of the judgment table with a wrong expression.

No, didn't Wan Xiangdong say that the trial would continue, and there were no other problems?

He acquitted Huang Xuemei in the first instance, and the matter of going abroad has been arranged!

Now the presiding judge has convicted her daughter of a crime?!

This....

It's not just Huang Tao's fault.

When Huang Xuemei heard the verdict, her face suddenly turned pale.

…

PS: Ask for a monthly pass~

Mobile version:

『Click here to report error』『Add to bookmark』