Chapter 403 does not adjudicate, directly states the facts, and the verdict is made

Facing Su Bai's application for a direct judgment, Chu Changhe, who was sitting on the judgment table.

The existing situation was briefly summarized and organized.

Presently....

What both sides should have said has basically been expressed.

How should this case be decided, and how should the plaintiff's claim be determined.

Ultimately....

There is also a question of the division of responsibilities.

What he needs to determine is whether this responsibility needs to be assigned to Chenggong Law Firm and the two lawyers, Yu Cheng and Li Ming.

Of course, this point does not only need to be seen from the statement of the plaintiff Su Bai.

It also needs to be confirmed from a legal point of view.

Yu Cheng and Li Ming, in this matter, there is subjective malice.

And as lawyers, the two know the law and break the law, which is very obvious that there are deliberate rumors and slander.

Although the two refuted and explained this.

However, the rebuttals and explanations of the two are particularly weak in terms of objective factual evidence.

Thinking of this, Chu Changhe was about to ring the magic hammer.

Yu Cheng and Li Ming of the defense seemed a little anxious.

Is this a direct decision?

If they are judged directly, then won't they be finished?!

If it is really decided, then the plaintiff's claim is likely to be implemented.

The latter results speak for themselves ....

They will be decertified from their lawyer's license and the law firm will be closed for several months.

They can't afford it!

Come to think of it.

Li Ming immediately spoke:

"The presiding judge .... In our view, there is a specific issue of liability, such as whether there is a deliberate defamation of rumors. ”

"This needs to be discussed...."

Chu Changhe frowned slightly on the judgment seat:

"Now the evidence is on the table."

"Just now you also admitted that there was unfair competition."

"The evidence shows that the parties Yu Cheng and Li Ming, the two of you, carried out the initial act of spreading rumors."

"Is there a specific issue of liability, whether there is a deliberate rumor and slander, there is evidence for this, and what else needs to be discussed?"

Faced with the presiding judge's questioning, Li Ming wanted to continue to say something, but was interrupted by the presiding judge waving his hand.

"If the defense can produce any evidence, it can make a statement."

"But if the defense doesn't have any evidence, it just wants to show subjectively that it doesn't have such malicious tendencies."

"My suggestion is that the defense does not need to continue to make a statement, and the collegial panel will pass the existing objective evidence and make a corresponding judgment."

"Based on the above, I would like to ask if the defendant can produce any substantive evidence?"

Li Ming's words are stopped, substantive evidence, he really can't come up with!

Faced with the presiding judge's inquiry, Li Ming could only shake his head: "Presiding judge." ”

"We have no substantial evidence at this time."

"Okay!"

Chu Changhe nodded: "Since there is no substantial evidence. ”

"So does the defense have any objections to the above defense?"

When Li Ming heard this question, he could only continue to shake his head: "No." ”

"Hmm!"

After questioning Li Ming, Chu Changhe then asked the lawyers entrusted by the other three media outlets if they had any other objections to the trial.

After getting an answer with no objections.

Chu Changhe rang the gavel: "All parties have no objection to the above defense. ”

"The collegial panel rejected the judgment of the plaintiff's application."

"Reason for rejection: The verdict is announced along with the verdict."

"For the time being, we will not judge the issues related to it."

"Since there is no objection from all parties to the defense, the facts are clear, and the objective evidence is sufficient, the defense link is now concluded."

"Let's make a court statement."

"Ask the defense West Side metropolitan media to begin the court presentation."

Faced with the presiding judge's decision to reject the application, Su Bai had no objection.

Because it can be clearly seen from the current state of the trial.... The presiding judge's judgment tendency.

The rejection of the application decision does not mean that the decision is not disagreed.

And what?

Instead, it is intended to proceed directly to the verdict and shorten the trial time.

This idea of the presiding judge can also be seen through the direct presentation of the court case.

The court statement of the West Side Metropolitan Media is very simple, and the summary is-

Admit your mistakes with sincerity and throw the responsibility to Success Law Firm.

It also requested that the court be able to reduce the time for public apology to be published, taking into account the nature of the impact.

After the court presentation in the West End Metropolitan Media.

The lawyers entrusted by the Minsheng Media and Tianyu Media in the Western District also stated from these aspects, and tried to avoid the punishment results for them.

For these three outlets, it is not the other decisions that matter.

Rather, it is the time limit for a public apology.

If a media outlet has publicly apologized for so long, the impact is that the news published by the media and its credibility will be greatly reduced.

This can be fatal for a media outlet.

Therefore, the demands of the three media are basically the same.

After the three media finished the court, Chu Changhe, as the presiding judge, then asked the defense Chenggong Law Firm to make a court statement.

This time, the statement stage was made by Yu Cheng.

For this trial, Yu Cheng's original plan was to win this trial.

Then it also has a very positive effect on their successful law firm.

But what he didn't expect was that now they were going to lose the lawsuit.

It's not just about losing the case....

And they can hardly afford the consequences of losing the lawsuit!

The only way to salvage their image as the defence in the subjective aspect of the presiding judge is now through court statements.

Thereby.... Let the verdict after losing the case not be so serious.

After all.... The result of losing the case was that he and Li Ming's lawyer's licenses were directly cancelled.

There is also the possibility of suspending Berjaya Law Firm for a few months.

This is tantamount to directly ruining their career prospects and career paths.

Thinking of this, Yu Cheng opened his mouth, and this opening was to apologize to Su Bai:

"Presiding Judge, our courtroom statement is simple."

"We know that our actions have caused great adverse effects to the plaintiff, and I would like to apologize to the plaintiff in advance."

"We also know that our apology may not be able to make up for the losses suffered by Baijun Law Firm and the reputational damage caused to Mr. Su Bai."

"We feel deeply guilty about this."

"But..."

"In this final court presentation, I would also like to say a little bit about our successful law firm."

"And the psychological journey before the rumor."

"Our successful law firm is not a big law firm in Beidu, because there are so many top law firms in Beidu that are very capable."

"Our law firm wasn't doing very well before."

"I and the other partners have always wanted to change the status quo of the law firm, but we didn't have the opportunity."

"The reason why I went to spread rumors about Baijun Law Firm this time, or the reason why I went to touch Baijun Law Firm."

"The main thing I want is that Baijun Law Firm has a great reputation in China, and the founder lawyer Su Bai is even more famous on the Internet in short videos."

"I want to pass the case of Dong Guoguo, through the relationship between me and lawyer Su Bai as the lawyer entrusted by the defendant and the victim respectively."

"It's a hype that can be said to be carried out."

"But we didn't expect such a serious situation to occur, and it caused such a serious loss to Baijun Law Firm."

"One more point."

"We can make a public apology to recover the losses of Baijun Law Firm."

"Clarify to the media that these matters are all our actions and our mistakes."

"Li Ming and I, as partners of Chenggong Law Firm, are also defendants in this incident."

"We are also very aware of our problems."

"We would also like to ask the presiding judge to consider whether we were unintentional and whether there are other objective conditions."

"In this way, the verdict will be made."

"Presiding Judge, the above is the content of our court statement."

Yu Cheng's court statement was more based on empathy.

I want to let the presiding judge bring their perspective into the perspective of the judge to make a mitigated sentence.

But is this realistic?

It's not very realistic at all.

Because objective facts and objective conditions are already in front of us.

Again.

The presiding judge may not be able to empathize with their situation in the trial.

For Yu Cheng's statutory statement, when Su Bai obtained the consent of the presiding judge to make a court statement.

There was no immediate rebuttal.

Instead, a few questions were asked.

"Presiding Judge, our court statement is based on the defendant's point of view."

"Here, I would like to ask the defense a few questions."

"First of all...."

"Isn't the defendant's statement about your rumor-mongering mentality for the purpose of unfair competition?"

"Are rumor-mongering and unfair competition illegal?"

"Do you know it's illegal?"

"In the previous pleading, the defense has admitted that your actions were improper."

"It can be inferred from this that the two lawyers for the defense knew that what they did was illegal and continued to commit it."

"For the above, it is an objective fact."

"Again."

"I can also understand that in Beidu, the development of law firms needs to be slowly precipitated, and successful law firms want to seize any opportunity to develop."

"But why can't we develop through legitimate channels and legitimate rights and interests, but use illegal means to carry out development?"

Yu Cheng was silent and did not answer.

Seeing this, Su Bai continued to speak:

"From this point of view, the arguments of Chenggong Law Firm, and the two defense attorneys who are now sitting in the defendant's seat, simply do not hold water."

"Why?"

"Because objective facts already exist."

"Objective evidence is already able to show what they were thinking in the first place."

"There is no point in stating subjective thoughts."

"Choosing to spread rumors and unfair competition is in itself the thinking and knowledge of the two partners and lawyers of Chenggong Law Firm."

"Whether from a subjective point of view, from an objective point of view, or from a legal fact."

"We do not agree with the practices and conduct of the defendant Chenggong Law Firm."

"We also do not accept the apology of the defendant Chenggong Law Firm."

“.….”

That's it.

Su Bai looked up at the presiding judge's seat, waiting for the presiding judge to continue to punish.

Yu Cheng's statement, to put it bluntly, still wants the presiding judge to empathize with them and understand their practice of developing the law firm.

But what are the facts?

The truth is, they don't do it to create empathy for people.

Why?

Because they are against the law!

As a lawyer, don't they know that doing so can lead to legal problems?

Definitely know!

So why do they continue to do this?

The purpose of this is to believe that Baijun Law Firm may not sue.

Or maybe they think they can't get their hands on it.

This is their original psychology....

As for the rest, it is nothing more than a pretext and a justification to evade justice.

…

PS: Ask for a monthly pass~

Mobile version:

『Click here to report error』『Add to bookmark』