Today's second update!

June 1, Republic 2783 (1942). Han Kyung, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

“...... Facts have proved that Orissa's Hindustan army has committed extremely serious crimes in Bengal, which is anti-civilization, anti-#human! Such an act has completely violated the minimum moral bottom line of mankind, this is a crime against the entire civilized world, and it is intolerable!" Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhou Changyun righteously condemned the atrocities of the Indian armed forces.

In front of reporters from various media outlets, he first showed a large number of photos and videos, as well as interrogation transcripts and testimonies of victims. It proves that the Indian army has carried out crimes such as mass murder, large-scale forced beep, and forcibly robbing people's women as comfort women in Bangladesh.

"May I ask Mr. Spokesman, can we interview the victims?" asked a French female journalist.

"Of course you can, but you have to get their consent, and in order to protect the privacy of the victims, you can't use their real names to report ......"

"Mr. Spokesman, how is China going to deal with those Indian officers and soldiers who committed crimes?" asked an American reporter.

"We will organize a special court for the Human Revolutionary Union to hold a public trial of these Indian officers and soldiers who have committed crimes. The judges of the Special Court will be composed of professional judges from all countries participating in peacekeeping operations. The court will sentence all offenders in accordance with Chinese law and let them get the punishment they deserve!" replied Zhou Changyun.

The American journalist said: "This is not right, these people belong to the Autonomous State of Orissa, and the victims are not Chinese citizens, so even if they do commit crimes, China has no power to try them." China went to trial a group of Orissa, which is a violation of the sovereignty of the Autonomous State of Orissa......"

Zhou Changyun smiled and said, "Mr. reporter, what you said is not correct. Let me start with a question for you, if in the United States, would the actions of these Indian officers and soldiers be considered a good deed?"

"Of course not! Our United States is a just country! The actions of these Indians are a grave crime! But ......," the American journalist hurriedly said. He would not have committed such a problem of political correctness. Besides, the United States is a Puritan country, and the kind of behavior of the Asan is definitely against the mainstream values of the United States, but this matter has nothing to do with them, so naturally there will be no condemnation. But the nature of the act itself, they dare not deny either.

Zhou Changyun interrupted him and asked other reporters: "Well, we already know the opinion of this American journalist, and he considers the behavior of these Indian officers and soldiers to be a serious crime by the standards of American society. Do the other gentlemen and ladies have any objection to the nature of the matter as a wicked act?"

What else is there to say about this? As long as a normal country does not think that such things as forced beeping, massacres, forced comfort women, and so on are good things. Even the European and American powers did not do this kind of thing, but at least on the surface, they could not admit that this kind of thing was good. This is a kind of political correctness in a broad sense, many things can be done in private, but you can't take it out and talk about it, let alone be caught by others in pigtails. Because no government with a passing IQ would consider itself "evil."

Naturally, it is impossible for these journalists to go against mainstream values and approve of the actions of Indians on such an issue. Otherwise, let's not say whether it has any effect for the time being, if it is known by the country, if it is not killed by the government, it will be sprayed to death by the people, you dare to say that our country is evil, and it is strange if you are not killed. Even if they are not happy with China's approach now, they can only pinch their noses and say: These Ah San are just bad, they are bad.

The standard for judging whether it is a bad thing or not is similar to that of the drow elf society in DND, that is, "a crime that is not caught is not a crime". If you don't get caught, then you can do whatever you want to the victim, but if you are caught, then you will consider yourself unlucky.

Of course, there is also the question of power comparison. If the strength of the criminal is stronger than that of the injustice, at most he will be disgraced, and maybe he will be able to fight back. If the two sides are equal, then there will be a bargain. But what if the injustice is stronger, or the kind of strong man who can torture criminals with one hand? Moreover, if this strong man who is against the sky also happens to want to find a model to establish his authority and gain prestige, then it will not be easy for this criminal to die even if he wants to.

Orissa's Hindustani people are so unlucky, they just committed a bunch of broken things about the mainstream values of mankind, and they were caught by China, a strong man against the sky, and China just needs to catch a model to establish prestige and prestige. So they are tragic, they can't even find anyone to speak for them, and even the nominal suzerainty of Britain, does not dare to speak out on such an issue. Just kidding, after all, Bangladesh, which is plagued by the Asan, is also their Commonwealth country, since they are all "their own people", even if they pull the bias, they can't pull it too hard.

However, the American journalist was not convinced, and continued: "Mr. Spokesman, I still think that China's approach is unruly. Even if the Indians were to be tried, it should be up to the Orissa State, or the injured party's Bengal State. It should not be China who comes forward, because this is a violation of the sovereignty of the Autonomous State of Orissa!"

Zhou Changyun smiled: "First of all, this has nothing to do with nationality, we are upholding international justice and the most basic rights of human beings." We have always believed that upholding human rights is a universal truth in the world and that human rights should be higher than sovereignty. Is it possible that in the United States, such evil deeds will be indulged?...... Secondly, this is not China's judgment against him, but the entire People's Revolutionary Union country. ”

Then Zhou Changyun changed his serious expression and said: "As early as last year, my country has repeatedly called for attention to the chaotic situation in the Indian subcontinent in the League of Nations, and has submitted a memorandum to various major powers, asking the major powers, especially the United Kingdom, to take responsibility and stop the humanitarian disaster there. These are documented. Unfortunately, however, our call has not been answered. ”

His tone changed: "Of course, we also understand the lack of timely response from the European and American powers, after all, they are all at war." However, the continued turmoil in the subcontinent has not only caused a large number of humanitarian disasters, but is also bound to endanger the security of its neighboring countries, and therefore must be stopped! Since the major powers are unable to take care of the problems of the subcontinent, China, as a responsible major power, will certainly not let it go. ”

European and American reporters were so choked by him that they looked at each other and were speechless.

Later, the press conference became a personal performance by Mr. Zhou, who touted China's peacekeeping operation as a great humanitarian relief operation. In order to protect the lives and property of ordinary people, the elderly, the weak, women and children, to maintain world peace, and to protect the earth from destruction, the countries of the People's Revolutionary Union led by China have traveled thousands of miles and with a strong spirit of dedication to carry out this great action aimed at maintaining peace in the subcontinent.

In short, it is a purpose, China is a great drop, a glorious drop, a righteous drop! Any person or organization that opposes this action and erects obstacles to this action must be so evil that it will bubble up and be a bad egg!

In fact, Wen Deji will set up this archway, that is, to dress himself up and China as a kind and peace-loving country, in order to reduce his threat in the eyes of the world, and to erect China into a great and righteous image, such as the hope of mankind, the example of the earth, or something. Otherwise, it will have a bad impact on China's world strategy.

Single-handedly taking on the whole world sounds like a bulker, and with China's current strength, it can also single-handedly take on the whole world, but in practice, it is not an easy thing to do. Let's not talk about how much it costs to do this kind of thing and how many people die, but what if you push all the world powers?

Wen Desi would never do such a stupid thing as "unifying the world", and he is not the kind of brainless middle two. As long as a person with a normal IQ can imagine: if the whole world becomes China, then it means that the people of the whole world have to be fed.

At present, the happy life of the Chinese people is based on the exploitation of the whole world, and although this "exploitation" in China is very hidden and mild compared with Europe, the essence is still exploitation. Relying on scissors to buy foreign industrial and agricultural raw materials at low prices, and then using the processed industrial products to sell to them, there is no need to talk about the difference in the added value of raw materials and finished products. Then there are all kinds of high-tech products with a monopoly nature. The sale of these things in foreign countries is also a form of exploitation.

If it's all people from one country, you have to at least have a bowl of water, and without the distinction between countries, this kind of exploitation cannot be carried out. There is also welfare, the current Chinese social welfare system is very high, although it cannot be compared with the Nordic high-welfare countries in later generations, but it is first-class in the current world.

Now there are more than 900 million people in China, and there are more than 1.9 billion people in the world. In addition, if exploitation is no longer possible, it will inevitably lead to a decline in the living standards of the people. This decline is very obvious, not to mention much, it can guarantee the current three achievements Thank God.

This kind of thing will not be done by anyone with a normal IQ. In the later generations of the original plane, Mexico once voluntarily merged with the United States, and the United States rejected this "door-to-door fat", which is also out of this consideration. The United States doesn't even do anything to feed tens of millions more people, so is Wen always stupid enough to do things to feed hundreds of millions more?

For example, if you open a company, are you willing to share the profits with the workers? Or is a very rich family willing to let a group of people you don't know become family members and live the same life as yourself? Or does he use his own money to support the poor? Obviously, it is certain that 99.999% of people will not want to.

Therefore, "unifying the world" is something that does not do any good except to satisfy the vanity of the middle two, and Wen Deji will never do it. He's not the kind of non-mainstream.