I find that some writers have very problematic attitudes towards history. Of course, you write foreign history, and I don't care what Constantinople looks like, just toss around.

However, many ancient Chinese historical materials, especially ancient Chinese maps, cannot be found by professionals, which is also a shortcoming of the records at that time.

If you can't find it, then write it casually, don't describe it with a nose and a glance, and mislead the reader into thinking that the real historical city is also like this.

You can also make a map, and note in the easter egg chapter: This map was compiled by the author of the book.

It's not difficult to add a watermark, right?

But many authors are not like that.

I deliberately made up a map to match my plot, but I won't say that I made it up, even if not a single stroke in it is true, even the plane shape of the city is fake.

And I don't say that it's borrowed from somewhere else, anyway, I don't say anything, and the reader is misled into thinking that this is a historical map, and that's their stupidity. I'm just bullying you for not having the ability to discern, in order to create a "sense of reality" that I write historical essays.

Next, I will send out scanned versions of various ancient maps in the comment section of this chapter, so that everyone can see what a real historical map looks like. In the future, everyone will be able to tell at a glance what map is a historical map and what map is made up by the author.

Follow the comments section of this chapter.

What is the map of the ancient city in "Elegy for the Tang Dynasty"? I am hitting it in my hand, please wait a moment,

Once the content is updated, please refresh the page again to get the latest updates!