The plot has entered the deep water area.,I've thought about it for hours tonight without writing.,I'm going to brew about it.,There's no guarantee that it will be updated tomorrow.,Here's a little idea I've been thinking about for hours.。

It's good for some readers to blindly guess the follow-up plot, but this book only ensures that the logic can stand up to scrutiny, and the humanities and social sciences knowledge in the book can stand scrutiny, but some may be written in reverse!

Thunder doesn't explode, at least not in my book.

The protagonist is not a person who can be invincible and kill all sides by relying on some small tricks. For example, the two tax laws are awesome, and you can write hundreds of thousands of words of reform plots in a book, but I don't mean that I will take it out, and there will be no splash.

To put it simply, this thing was useless in the Tang Dynasty! I washed and slept directly.

There is no need to make a "winning" guess about these little tricks, this book only ensures that there is no problem with the logic of the operation, and it is normal to write it as a bomb. When you see a gun on the wall, it will inevitably happen that the protagonist will hit someone with this gun, this matter is not absolute, and this book does not follow this routine.

I have a lot of dry goods in my stomach, and I can write a lot of dry goods in this book, and I won't engage in those tricky plots and write a very childish thing high. If you look at it, the book must be over four million words.

Recently, I have written about the land issue in the Tang and Song dynasties, the development of the market economy, which is very profound and difficult to understand, and this line is the main line after the disillusionment of the Tang Dynasty in history. I spent a lot of time researching it.

Where are the advantages of the two tax laws, why can they be promoted, why did the three-province and six-ministry system substantially disintegrate, why the land contradictions in the era of feudal towns were eased, where are the advantages of the commodity economy over the small peasant economy, and how should the regime be freed from the feudal model after the decline of the Tang Dynasty.

The real answers to these questions are very complicated, and even diametrically opposed to what ordinary people think in their heads, and it is very naïve to take some very superficial stereotypes to routinely plot the plot.

Most people pursue social stability and prosperity, and whose society is this society, who is the stability to the greatest extent, who needs to abide by the rules of the game, and who is the person who makes the rules of the game.

These are the prerequisites of many questions, the precursors of those problems. The answers to the pre-existing questions are different, so the conclusions of the follow-up questions, as well as the path that the protagonist is going to take, are also completely different and diametrically opposed.

Again, there is no need to use the inherent vulgar plot to set up things that I spent a lot of time researching and thinking.

The best example of the answer to this pre-question is Kego.

If the prosperity of Datang is the prosperity of Ji Ge, and the stability is the stability of Ji Ge, which meets the needs of Ji Ge to the greatest extent, or if Ji Ge is making the rules of the game at will, will you be satisfied?

The answer is obvious.

Why are some historical texts written in such a way that the protagonist is like a schizophrenic, that those books can't answer or deliberately don't answer the question I just said:

Ask who is in the world today!

So by extension, it's easy to follow the idea of the plot:

What does the existence and disillusionment of the Tang Dynasty really mean?

Should an unbreakable alliance be thrown into the trash, or should it be lived in a dream, or should it become a footnote to the story?

The title of this book is "Elegy for the Tang Dynasty".