First of all, big brother, you've been commenting and I've been following the reply, except for the repeated ones, I've replied to your questions, and they've all explained, but you haven't read them, you're just commenting there, and finally come to the conclusion, I'm reducing my intelligence, I want to prove that the protagonist's unreasonable lawsuit is very awesome, and I stand in the driver's position regardless of whether it's reasonable or not, saying that I'm affected by a certain case and want to make up for the driver's unreasonable case......

Big brother, first of all, I will give you a judgment number, you go to see it first, (2018) Yue 0111 Xingchu No. 1343, to see if I am deliberately proving that the protagonist is playing an unreasonable case, and then you can join the group, and talk to me, and then, even if we are debating, we have to give people a chance to open their mouths, you say vigorously, you don't read a bunch of backs, and you don't reply, what is the meaning of that, the same case The judgments of different courts may be different, I just deliberately made up for it...... There's a verdict, you can take a look at it, okay, I've got a bunch of hands back, my hands are sour, big brother, don't you take a look, then send a single chapter to explain it, this will always be read.

Then, reply to your question again, where is your question focused, focused on saying that pulling drunks, drunk people who drink too much may stick out their heads and vomit, so after getting in the car, the driver should close the window, and it can be foreseen, right, and then, the prosecutor will reduce his intelligence, just say what to foresee, and then, without paying, you can forcibly pull people back This is a restriction of personal freedom.

I'll reply one by one, the first and the second, the drunk, this is your determination, in the case I wrote about a person who drank alcohol, was conscious after getting into the car, and there were companions, and then the windows should be closed, because they may stick out their heads and vomit, so they have to bear this criminal responsibility if they jump out of the car, do you think it is reasonable? Why do prosecutors have to start with foresight because they don't understand anything?

Because of the crime of causing serious injury by negligence, there must be a foreseeable circumstance or a foreseeable circumstance in the subjective aspect, and the causal relationship here is that jumping out of the car should be foreseen rather than sticking out the head and vomiting!

Can other circumstances be inserted in the middle of the causal relationship in a criminal case? Can you still insert the possibility of sticking out your head and vomiting? Did he stick out his head and vomit, no, he jumped directly, the law only talks about evidence, and there is no such behavior of sticking out his head and vomiting in the evidence, so he can join it by guessing out of thin air?

Take another 10,000 steps back, you can claim based on this, the driver, you have not fully guaranteed my safety, you have to bear the fault liability, then this is also civil liability, when will it be criminal?

And then there is the third one, you can forcibly pull people away without paying, I also replied to you, in the case of a fare dispute, in order to protect their own interests, it is not improper to carry passengers back to the place of origin, why, the reason is that first of all, this is in the city, not a suburb, it is a pure city, the kind of bright lights.

Secondly, there are two passengers, and in the previous behavior, the two did not give money, but also scolded the driver and slapped the body, in fact, the driver was afraid, and there is no problem with the specific analysis of the specific case, judging it in combination with the previous behavior, so in this case, if you don't give money, I said to pull you back to the same place, is there a problem? This is the meaning of the verdict, the passenger said that it was no problem to get off the bus, and if he felt that he was in danger in this situation, you could choose to call the police, or other methods, jumping out of the car was not an inevitable and only option, and he was stopped by his companion for the first time.

Rough answer, if you still feel dissatisfied, I also gave you the judgment number, you can see, what am I trying to force to write this kind of unreasonable text? I'm getting sprayed.